Reporting guideline for interventional trials of primary and incisional ventral hernia repair
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34286842
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znab157
PII: 6324825
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- břišní stěna chirurgie MeSH
- chirurgické síťky * MeSH
- incizní kýla chirurgie MeSH
- klinické zkoušky jako téma normy MeSH
- laparoskopie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- operace kýly metody MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma * MeSH
- ventrální hernie chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Primary and incisional ventral hernia trials collect unstandardized inconsistent data, limiting data interpretation and comparison. This study aimed to create two minimum data sets for primary and incisional ventral hernia interventional trials to standardize data collection and improve trial comparison. To support these data sets, standardized patient-reported outcome measures and trial methodology criteria were created. METHODS: To construct these data sets, nominal group technique methodology was employed, involving 15 internationally recognized abdominal wall surgeons and two patient representatives. Initially a maximum data set was created from previous systematic and panellist reviews. Thereafter, three stages of voting took place: stage 1, selection of the number of variables for data set inclusion; stage 2, selection of variables to be included; and stage 3, selection of variable definitions and detection methods. A steering committee interpreted and analysed the data. RESULTS: The maximum data set contained 245 variables. The three stages of voting commenced in October 2019 and had been completed by July 2020. The final primary ventral hernia data set included 32 variables, the incisional ventral hernia data set included 40 variables, the patient-reported outcome measures tool contained 25 questions, and 40 methodological criteria were chosen. The best known variable definitions were selected for accurate variable description. CT was selected as the optimal preoperative descriptor of hernia morphology. Standardized follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years was selected. CONCLUSION: These minimum data sets, patient-reported outcome measures, and methodological criteria have allowed creation of a manual for investigators aiming to undertake primary ventral hernia or incisional ventral hernia interventional trials. Adopting these data sets will improve trial methods and comparisons.
Abdominal Wall Unit General Surgery University College London Hospital London UK
Centre for Medical Imaging University College London London UK
Department of Colorectal Surgery University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK
Department of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery North Devon District Hospital Barnstaple UK
Department of Surgery Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands
Department of Surgery Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital Amsterdam the Netherlands
Department of Surgery Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Department of Surgery Skåne University Hospital Malmö Malmö Sweden
Intestinal Failure Unit Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Salford UK
Patient Representative Glasgow UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society