Background The effect of racial/ethnic group on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unknown. We tested this concept in non-metastatic UTUC patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and hypothesized that important differences may exist according to racial/ethnic groups. Material and Methods We relied on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016). We relied on Propensity-score matching (ratio 1:4). Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models (CRR) addressed cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results Of 9129 assessable patients, 7454 (81.7%) were Caucasian vs. 665 (7.3%) Hispanic vs. 584 (6.4%) Asian vs. 426 (4.7%) African-American. No statistically significant differences were recorded for tumor grade or T-stage, between all racial/ethnic groups. However, within patents who received lymph-node dissection (n = 2694, 29.5%), Asians exhibited the highest rate of more than 2 positive lymph nodes at RNU (19.0%, followed by 17.1% African-Americans, 15.0% Caucasians and 12.6% Hispanics, P < 0.001). After PS-matching and multivariable CRR, Asian race/ethnicity independently predicted higher CSM, relative to Caucasians (Hazard ratio: 1.29, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences according to CSM was recorded in the remaining races/ethnicities comparisons (all P ≥ 0.1) Conclusion Important CSM differences may exist according to race/ethnicity in non-metastatic UTUC patients treated with RNU. However, these differences only apply to Asian patients, who account for 6% of the overall non-metastatic UTUC cohort treated with RNU. In consequence, in clinical practice Asian patients should be given particular attention with the intent of reducing the CSM disadvantage that cannot be clearly explained by stage and/or grade disadvantage at diagnosis.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada; Department of Neurosciences Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology Urology Unit University of Naples Federico 2 Naples Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada; Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada; Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Neurosciences Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology Urology Unit University of Naples Federico 2 Naples Italy

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia; Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

References provided by Crossref.org

Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic versus open radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial cancer patients: Experiences of a tertiary care single center