Long-term survival of carotid stenting patients with regard to single- or double-vessel carotid artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis

. 2021 ; 17 (4) : 849-855. [epub] 20200817

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34336012

INTRODUCTION: There is lack of long-term data outside of controlled clinical trials in carotid artery stenting (CAS). In this study, we compared the short-term outcome, long-term survival, and rate of re-interventions for restenosis in patients after CAS, related to the extent of carotid atherosclerosis classified as single-vessel (unilateral) or double-vessel (bilateral) carotid artery disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 599 patients with significant carotid artery stenosis, who underwent 763 CAS procedures, and used the propensity score to match 226 pairs (452 patients) in the single- or double-vessel carotid disease. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of in-hospital major adverse events (3.5% vs. 3.1% of patients in the double-vessel carotid group vs. the single-vessel carotid group; p = 1) The mean follow-up was 6.1 ±4.0 years, and a total of 181 (40%) deaths occurred during 2759 patient-years, which translates into 7.8 and 5.3 deaths per 100 patient-years in the double-vessel carotid group and the single-vessel carotid group, respectively (p < 0.01). The survival in the double-vessel carotid group vs. the single-vessel carotid group at 10 years was 46% (95% CI: 38-54%) vs. 55% (95% CI: 47-63%) (p < 0.01). Twenty-four (11%) patients and 6 (3%) patients underwent re-interventions for restenosis in the double-vessel and the single-vessel carotid disease group, respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAS and significant double-vessel carotid artery disease had similar peri-procedural risk, but had a worse long-term survival, and a higher rate of re-interventions for restenosis compared to the single-vessel carotid artery disease patients.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Burggraf GW, Parker JO. Prognosis in coronary artery disease: angiographic, hemodynamic and clinical factors. Circulation. 1975;31:146–56. PubMed

Veselka J, Zimolová P, Špaček M, et al. Comparison of carotid artery stenting in patients with single versus bilateral carotid artery disease and factors affecting mid-term outcome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:796–804. PubMed

Veselka J, Černá D, Zimolová P, et al. Thirty-day outcome of direct carotid stenting with cerebral protection in high-risk patients. Circ J. 2007;71:1468–72. PubMed

Štěchovský C, Hájek P, Horváth M, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy combined with intravascular ultrasound in carotid arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imag. 2016;32:181–8. PubMed

Štěchovský C, Hájek P, Horváth M, Veselka J. Effect of stenting on the near-infrared spectroscopy-derived lipid core burden index of carotid artery plaque. EuroIntervention. 2019;12:e289–96. PubMed

Artas H, Okcesiz I. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of carotid artery plaque surface irregularity. Arch Med Sci. 2019;16:58–65. PubMed PMC

Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, et al. Management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 Clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular surgery (ESVS) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:3–81. PubMed

Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816. PubMed

Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:126–70. PubMed

Harris PJ, Harrel FE, Lee KL, Behar VS, Rosati RA. Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1979;60:1259–69. PubMed

Tam DY, Bakaeen F, Feldman DN, et al. Modality selection for the revascularization of left main disease. Can J Cardiol. 2019;35:983–92. PubMed

Calais F, Ostman ME, Hedberg P, Rosenblad A, Leppert J, Frobert O. Incremental prognostic value of coronary and systemic atherosclerosis after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2018;261:6–11. PubMed

Cappeletti A, Astore D, Godino C, et al. Relationship between Syntax Score and prognostic localization of coronary artery lesions with conventional risk factors, plasma profile markers, and carotid atherosclerosis (CAPP Study 2) Int J Cardiol. 2018;257:306–11. PubMed

Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS, et al. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1021–31. PubMed PMC

Rosenfield K, Matsumura JS, Chatuverdi S, et al. Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1011–20. PubMed

Columbo JA, Martinez-Camblor P, MacKenzie TA, et al. A comparative analysis of long-term mortality after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:104–9. PubMed PMC

Mudra H, Staubach S, Hein-Rothweiler R, et al. Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in clinical practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003940. PubMed

Štěchovský C, Hájek P, Horváth M, Špaček M, Veselka J. Composition of carotid artery stenosis and restenosis: A series of patients assessed with intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;207:64–6. PubMed

Hellings WE, Moll FI, de Vries JP, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. Histological characterization of restenotic carotid plaque in relation to recurrence interval and clinical presentation: a cohort study. Stroke. 2008;39:1029–32. PubMed

Tekieli L, Musialek P, Kablak-Ziembicka A, et al. Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS) Adv Interv Cardiol. 2019;15:465–71. PubMed PMC

Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfart J, et al. Clinical impact and predictors of carotid in-stent restenosis. J Neurol. 2012;259:1896–902. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...