Thirty-day outcomes of direct carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in high-risk patients
Language English Country Japan Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
17721030
DOI
10.1253/circj.71.1468
PII: JST.JSTAGE/circj/71.1468
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Stroke etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left complications MeSH
- Myocardial Infarction complications MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cerebellum MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Coronary Artery Disease complications MeSH
- Kidney Diseases complications MeSH
- Lung Diseases complications MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Carotid Stenosis complications therapy MeSH
- Stents * adverse effects MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Implantation of a carotid artery stent after predilation is a standard approach in the endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenoses. Stenting without predilation may be an alternative approach in a certain subset of patients. The present prospective, single-center registry was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of direct carotid artery stenting (DCAS) in high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic patients with stenosis >50% and asymptomatic patients with stenosis >70% were eligible for enrolment. Criteria for high-risk patients included: need or history of open heart surgery, history of myocardial infarction, multivessel coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or =40%), severe pulmonary or renal disease, significant contralateral carotid disease, previous endarterectomy, and age > or =80 years. All procedures were performed using a filter protection device. Patients underwent complete clinical examination before and after DCAS and at 30-day follow-up. A total of 83 consecutive patients (45 males, 68+/-9 years, 33% symptomatic) underwent 100 procedures and 103 stents were deployed successfully. The technical success rate of stenting was 100%. Predilation of carotid stenosis was necessary in 1 (1%) procedure. Carotid-artery stenoses before and after DCAS were 80+/-9% and 7+/-9%, respectively. The median fluoroscopic time for DCAS was 7 min. The overall rate of in-hospital major adverse cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, myocardial infarction) was 5% (2 minor strokes, 3 transient attacks). There was 1 (1%) minor stroke within the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: DCAS is feasible and can be performed with an acceptable risk in high-risk patients.
References provided by Crossref.org
Near-infrared spectroscopy combined with intravascular ultrasound in carotid arteries
Carotid Artery Stenting-Historical Context, Trends, and Innovations
Carotid artery stenting - current status of the procedure
Comparison of mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting for moderate versus critical stenosis