Comparison of carotid artery stenting in patients with single versus bilateral carotid artery disease and factors affecting midterm outcome
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
21530157
DOI
10.1016/j.avsg.2011.02.011
PII: S0890-5096(11)00129-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- angioplastika škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení mortalita MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda etiologie MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- infarkt myokardu etiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis komplikace mortalita terapie MeSH
- stenty * MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- tranzitorní ischemická ataka etiologie MeSH
- výběr pacientů MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the method of choice for carotid artery revascularization of patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy. In this study, we compared the midterm results of CAS in patients with unilateral versus bilateral carotid artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year outcome of 273 consecutive patients in whom 342 CAS procedures were performed. The incidence of periprocedural transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) differed significantly (8% vs. 1%; p = 0.01) among patients with and without bilateral internal carotid disease, and a tendency to a lower occurrence of early adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction) was subsequently shown (11% vs. 5%; p = 0.12). At 1-year follow-up, there was a high incidence of adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction, restenosis) in patients with bilateral carotid artery disease (40% vs. 14%; p < 0.01), which was mainly driven by a higher incidence of death, periprocedural TIA, and restenosis (p ≤ 0.02 for all). According to multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of midterm adverse events were left ventricular dysfunction, male gender, bilateral carotid artery disease, renal insufficiency, cerebral symptoms within the last 6 months before the intervention, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. CONCLUSIONS: At midterm follow-up, patients with bilateral carotid artery disease treated by CAS have significantly more adverse events than those with unilateral disease.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org