Causal and non-causal explanations in code biology
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34358618
DOI
10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104499
PII: S0303-2647(21)00146-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Biological sciences, Causal and non-causal explanation, Code biology, Mechanistic and design explanation, ‘Why’-questions,
- MeSH
- Biological Evolution MeSH
- Models, Biological * MeSH
- Biological Science Disciplines methods MeSH
- Biology methods MeSH
- Philosophy * MeSH
- Causality * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In the philosophy of science, we can consider debates about the nature of non-causal explanations in general (e.g. Reutlinger, Saatsi 2018; Lange 2017) and then especially those in the life sciences (e.g. Huneman, 2018; Kostić 2020). These debates are accompanied by the development of a new mechanism that is becoming the major response to the nature of scientific explanation in the life sciences (e.g. Craver, Darden 2013; Craver 2006); and also by the development of a design explanation (e.g. Eck, Mennes 2016) that represents a modern variant of a functional explanation. In this paper, we will methodically: 1. evaluate the plurality of explanatory strategies in contemporary science (chapter 2). 2. describe the mechanical philosophy and mechanistic explanation (Glennan 2016; Craver, Darden 2013, etc.) (chapter 3). 3. explicate the role of mechanisms in code biology (Barbieri 2015, 2002, etc.) and its relation to the new mechanism (chapter 4). 4. fulfill the main goal of the paper - to apply mechanistic explanations in code biology (Barbieri 2019, etc.) and to apply their suitability for this scientific domain (chapter 5).
References provided by Crossref.org