Temporal trends, tumor characteristics and stage-specific survival in penile non-squamous cell carcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34476653
PubMed Central
PMC8738356
DOI
10.1007/s10552-021-01493-3
PII: 10.1007/s10552-021-01493-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Adenocarcinoma, CSM, Cancer-specific mortality, Melanoma, Penile cancer, SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma, Variant histology,
- MeSH
- Adenocarcinoma * MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Penile Neoplasms * epidemiology MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell * epidemiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: To compare Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) vs. non-SCC penile cancer, since survival outcomes may differ between histological subtypes. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016), penile cancer patients of all stages were identified. Temporal trend analyses, cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier plots, multivariable Cox regression and Fine and Gray competing-risks regression analyses tested for CSM differences between non-SCC vs. SCC penile cancer patients. RESULTS: Of 4,120 eligible penile cancer patients, 123 (3%) harbored non-SCC vs. 4,027 (97%) SCC. Of all non-SCC patients, 51 (41%) harbored melanomas, 42 (34%) basal cell carcinomas, 10 (8%) adenocarcinomas, eight (6.5%) skin appendage malignancies, six (5%) epithelial cell neoplasms, two (1.5%) neuroendocrine tumors, two (1.5%) lymphomas, two (1.5%) sarcomas. Stage at presentation differed between non-SCC vs. SCC. In temporal trend analyses, non-SCC diagnoses neither decreased nor increased over time (p > 0.05). After stratification according to localized, locally advanced, and metastatic stage, no CSM differences were observed between non-SCC vs. SCC, with 5-year survival rates of 11 vs 11% (p = 0.9) for localized, 33 vs. 37% (p = 0.4) for locally advanced, and 1-year survival rates of 37 vs. 53% (p = 0.9) for metastatic penile cancer, respectively. After propensity score matching for patient and tumor characteristics and additional multivariable adjustment, no CSM differences between non-SCC vs. SCC were observed. CONCLUSION: Non-SCC penile cancer is rare. Although exceptions exist, on average, non-SCC penile cancer has comparable CSM as SCC penile cancer patients, after stratification for localized, locally invasive, and metastatic disease.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
See more in PubMed
Hakenberg OW et al (2018) EAU guidelines on penile cancer
Christodoulidou M, et al. Epidemiology of penile cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2015;39(3):126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2015.03.010. PubMed DOI
de Martel C, et al. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(4):664–670. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30716. PubMed DOI PMC
Barnholtz-Sloan JS, et al. Incidence trends in primary malignant penile cancer. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(5):361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.08.029. PubMed DOI
Graafland NM, et al. Incidence trends and survival of penile squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(2):426–432. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25355. PubMed DOI
Hansen BT, et al. Trends in incidence, mortality and survival of penile squamous cell carcinoma in Norway 1956–2015. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(8):1586–1593. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31194. PubMed DOI PMC
Schoffer O, et al. Penile cancer - Incidence, mortality, and survival in Saxony, Germany. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(4):295.e1–295.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.003. PubMed DOI
Brady KL, Mercurio MG, Brown MD. Malignant tumors of the penis. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(4):527–547. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12029. PubMed DOI
Moch H, et al. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029. PubMed DOI
Burt LM, Shrieve DC, Tward JD. Stage presentation, care patterns, and treatment outcomes for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.013. PubMed DOI
Mistretta FA, Palumbo C, Knipper S, Mazzone E, Pecoraro A, Tian Z, Musi G, Perrotte P, Montanari E, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, de Cobelli O, Karakiewicz PI (2020) Conditional survival of patients with stage I-III squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: temporal changes in cancer-specific mortality. World J Urol 38(3):725–732. 10.1007/s00345-019-02869-6 PubMed
Thuret R, et al. (2013) Competing-risks analysis in patients with T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. BJU Int 111(4 Pt B): E174–9. PubMed
Thuret R, et al. Conditional survival predictions after surgery for patients with penile carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117(16):3723–3730. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25974. PubMed DOI
Thuret R, et al. A population-based analysis of the effect of marital status on overall and cancer-specific mortality in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(1):71–79. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0091-y. PubMed DOI
Bechara GR, et al. Penile primary melanoma: analysis of six patients treated at Brazilian national cancer institute in the last eight years. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(6):823–831. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.06.08. PubMed DOI
Jabiles AG, et al. Penile melanoma: a 20-year analysis of six patients at the National cancer institute of Peru, Lima. Ecancermedicalscience. 2017;11:731. PubMed PMC
Moses KA, et al. Non-squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: single-center, 15-year experience. World J Urol. 2014;32(5):1347–1353. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1216-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Sanchez A, et al. Primary genitourinary melanoma: epidemiology and disease-specific survival in a large population-based cohort. Urol Oncol. 2016;34(4):166.e7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.009. PubMed DOI
Sánchez-Ortiz R, et al. Melanoma of the penis, scrotum and male urethra: a 40-year single institution experience. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1958–1965. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000159207.91737.53. PubMed DOI
Bhambhvani H, Greenberg D, Parham M, et al. A population-level analysis of nonsquamous penile cancer: the importance of histology. Urol Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.025. PubMed DOI
Wenzel M, Deuker M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Becker A, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison between urothelial and non urothelial urethral cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;29(10):629692. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.629692. PubMed DOI PMC
Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Nocera L, Tian Z, Roos FC, Becker A, Kluth LA, Tilki D, Shariat SF, Saad F, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Upper urinary tract tumors: variant histology versus urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021;19(2):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.11.004. PubMed DOI
Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Nocera L, Mansour M, Tian Z, Roos FC, Becker A, Kluth LA, Tilki D, Shariat SF, Saad F, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Micropapillary versus urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: stage at presentation and efficacy of chemotherapy across all stages-A SEER-based study. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.010. PubMed DOI
Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Stolzenbach LF, Wenzel M, Tian Z, Larcher A, Capitanio U, Mirone V, Tilki D, Chun FKH, Kapoor A, Shariat SF, Saad F, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Tumor stage and substage predict cancer-specific mortality after nephrectomy for nonmetastatic renal cancer: histological subtype-specific validation. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.009. PubMed DOI
National Cancer Institute. Overview of the SEER program. [Cited 2021] Available from https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html
World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (2013) In: Fritz A et al (eds)
Sobin L, Wittekind C (2011) TNM classificaiton of malignant tumours, 7th edn
Wenzel M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Tilki D, Mandel P, Becker A, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Incidence rates and contemporary trends in primary urethral cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01416-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Ruvolo CC, Nocera L, Tian Z, Saad F, Briganti A, Tilki D, Graefen M, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Increasing rates of NCCN high and very high-risk prostate cancer versus number of prostate biopsy cores. Prostate. 2021;81(12):874–881. doi: 10.1002/pros.24184. PubMed DOI
Dotan ZA, et al. Adult genitourinary sarcoma: the 25-year Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2033–2038. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.021. PubMed DOI
Mondaini N, et al. Clinical characteristics and overall survival in genitourinary sarcomas treated with curative intent: a multicenter study. Eur Urol. 2005;47(4):468–473. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.013. PubMed DOI
Nazemi A, Daneshmand S. Adult genitourinary sarcoma: a population-based analysis of clinical characteristics and survival. Urol Oncol. 2020;38(5):334–343. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.004. PubMed DOI
Arya M, et al. Long-term trends in incidence, survival and mortality of primary penile cancer in England. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(12):2169–2176. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0293-y. PubMed DOI
Baldur-Felskov B, et al. Increased incidence of penile cancer and high-grade penile intraepithelial neoplasia in Denmark 1978–2008: a nationwide population-based study. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(2):273–280. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9876-7. PubMed DOI