• This record comes from PubMed

COVID-19 lockdowns increase public interest in urban nature

. 2021 Aug ; 19 (6) : 320-322. [epub] 20210802

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

See more in PubMed

Basile M, Russo LF, Russo VG, et al. 2021. Birds seen and not seen during the COVID‐19 pandemic: the impact of lockdown measures on citizen science bird observations. Biol Conserv 256: 109079. PubMed PMC

Bates AE, Primack RB, Moraga P, et al. 2020. COVID‐19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “global human confinement experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 248: 108665. PubMed PMC

Beatley T. 2000. Green urbanism: learning from European cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

BirdLife International . 2017. European birds of conservation concern: populations, trends and national responsibilities. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.

Bratman GN, Anderson CB, Berman MG, et al. 2019. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci Advances 5: eaax0903. PubMed PMC

Corlett RT, Primack RB, Devictor V, et al. 2020. Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 246: 108571. PubMed PMC

Correia RA, Jepson PR, Malhado ACM, et al. 2016. Familiarity breeds content: assessing bird species popularity with culturomics. PeerJ 4: e1728. PubMed PMC

Correia RA, Ladle R, and Roll U. 2021. Special section: advancing conservation culturomics – introduction. Conserv Biol 35: 395–97. PubMed

Gaynor KM, Brashares JS, Gregory GH, et al. 2020. Anticipating the impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on wildlife. Front Ecol Environ 18: 542–43. PubMed PMC

Gordo O, Brotons L, Herrando S, et al. 2020. Rapid behavioural response of urban birds to COVID‐19 lockdown. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 288: 20202513. PubMed PMC

Kleinschroth F and Kowarik I. 2020. COVID‐19 crisis demonstrates the urgent need for urban greenspaces. Front Ecol Environ 18: 318–19. PubMed PMC

Ladle RJ, Correia RA, Do Y, et al. 2016. Conservation culturomics. Front Ecol Environ 14: 269–75.

Ladle RJ, Jepson P, Correia RA, et al. 2019. A culturomics approach to quantifying the salience of species on the global internet. People Nat 1: 524–32.

Manenti R, Mori E, Di Canio V, et al. 2020. The good, the bad and the ugly of COVID‐19 lockdown effects on wildlife conservation: insights from the first European locked down country. Biol Conserv 249: 108728. PubMed PMC

Rutz C, Loretto M-C, Bates AE, et al. 2020. COVID‐19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nat Ecol Evol 4: 1156–59. PubMed

Salazar G, Mills M, and Veríssimo D. 2019. Qualitative impact evaluation of a social marketing campaign for conservation. Conserv Biol 33: 634–44. PubMed

Schaefer M, Goldman E, Bartuska AM, et al. 2015. Nature as capital: advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 7383–89. PubMed PMC

Schultz PW. 2011. Conservation means behavior. Conserv Biol 25: 1080–83. PubMed

Vardi R, Berger-Tal O, and Roll U. 2021. iNaturalist insights illuminate COVID‐19 effects on large mammals in urban centers. Biol Conserv 254: 108953. PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...