Contribution of conspecific negative density dependence to species diversity is increasing towards low environmental limitation in Japanese forests
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34548522
PubMed Central
PMC8455644
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-98025-5
PII: 10.1038/s41598-021-98025-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Species coexistence is a result of biotic interactions, environmental and historical conditions. The Janzen-Connell hypothesis assumes that conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) is one of the local processes maintaining high species diversity by decreasing population growth rates at high densities. However, the contribution of CNDD to species richness variation across environmental gradients remains unclear. In 32 large forest plots all over the Japanese archipelago covering > 40,000 individual trees of > 300 species and based on size distributions, we analysed the strength of CNDD of individual species and its contribution to species number and diversity across altitude, mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation and maximum snow depth gradients. The strength of CNDD was increasing towards low altitudes and high tree species number and diversity. The effect of CNDD on species number was changing across altitude, temperature and snow depth gradients and their combined effects contributed 11-18% of the overall explained variance. Our results suggest that CNDD can work as a mechanism structuring forest communities in the Japanese archipelago. Strong CNDD was observed to be connected with high species diversity under low environmental limitations where local biotic interactions are expected to be stronger than in niche-based community assemblies under high environmental filtering.
Department of Botany Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic
Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000;31:343–366.
Wright JS. Plant diversity in tropical forests: A review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia. 2002;130:1–14. PubMed
Janzen DH. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am. Nat. 1970;104:501–528.
Connell J. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and rain forest trees. Dyn. Popul. 1971;298:312.
Terborgh JW. Toward a trophic theory of species diversity. PNAS. 2015;112:11415–11422. PubMed PMC
Johnson DJ, Beaulieu WT, Bever JD, Clay K. Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity. Science. 2012;336:904–907. PubMed
LaManna JA, et al. Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale. Science. 2017;356:1389–1392. PubMed
Chisholm RA, Muller-Landau HC. A theoretical model linking interspecific variation in density dependence to species abundances. Theor. Ecol. 2011;4:241–253.
Mangan SA, et al. Negative plant–soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature. 2010;466:752–755. PubMed
Chisholm RA, Fung T. Comment on “Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”. Science. 2018;360:eaar4685. PubMed
Hülsmann L, Hartig F. Comment on “Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”. Science. 2018;360:eaar2435. PubMed
Detto M, Visser MD, Wright SJ, Pacala SW. Bias in the detection of negative density dependence in plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 2019;22:1923–1939. PubMed
LaManna JA, et al. Response to Comment on “Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”. Science. 2018;360:eaar3824. PubMed
LaManna JA, et al. Response to Comment on “Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”. Science. 2018;360:eaar5245. PubMed
LaManna JA, Mangan SA, Myers JA. Conspecific negative density dependence and why its study should not be abandoned. Ecosphere. 2021;12:e03322.
Gaston KJ. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature. 2000;405:220–227. PubMed
Mittelbach GG, et al. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: Speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett. 2007;10:315–331. PubMed
Janzen DH. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am. Nat. 1967;101:233–249.
Ricklefs RE, He F. Region effects influence local tree species diversity. PNAS. 2016;113:674–679. PubMed PMC
Comita LS, et al. Testing predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: A meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival. J. Ecol. 2014;102:845–856. PubMed PMC
Currie DJ. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. Am. Nat. 1991;137:27–49.
Grosso SD, et al. Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. Ecology. 2008;89:2117–2126. PubMed
Chase, J. M. Stochastic Community Assembly Causes Higher Biodiversity in More Productive Environments. Science27, (2010). PubMed
O’Brien EM. Climatic gradients in woody plant species richness: Towards an explanation based on an analysis of Southern Africa’s woody flora. J. Biogeography. 1993;20:181–198.
McCain, C. M. & Grytnes, J.-A. Elevational Gradients in Species Richness. In eLS (American Cancer Society, 2010).
Barry RG. Mountain Weather and Climate. Cambridge University Press; 2008.
LaManna JA, Walton ML, Turner BL, Myers JA. Negative density dependence is stronger in resource-rich environments and diversifies communities when stronger for common but not rare species. Ecol. Lett. 2016;19:657–667. PubMed
Zhu K, Woodall CW, Monteiro JVD, Clark JS. Prevalence and strength of density-dependent tree recruitment. Ecology. 2015;96:2319–2327. PubMed
Yao J, et al. Abiotic niche partitioning and negative density dependence across multiple life stages in a temperate forest in northeastern China. J. Ecol. 2020;108:1299–1310.
Leigh EG, et al. Why do some tropical forests have so many species of trees? Biotropica. 2004;36:447–473.
Terborgh J. Enemies maintain hyperdiverse tropical forests. Am. Nat. 2012;179:303–314. PubMed
Altman J, et al. Linking spatiotemporal disturbance history with tree regeneration and diversity in an old-growth forest in northern Japan. PPEES. 2016;21:1–13.
Kubota Y, Hirao T, Fujii S, Shiono T, Kusumoto B. Beta diversity of woody plants in the Japanese archipelago: The roles of geohistorical and ecological processes. J. Biogeogr. 2014;41:1267–1276.
Mori AS. Local and biogeographic determinants and stochasticity of tree population demography. J. Ecol. 2019;107:1276–1287.
Oohata S. Distribution of tree species along the temperature gradient in the Japan archipelago (ii).: Life form and species distribution. Jap. J. Ecol. 1990;40:71–84.
Kira T. A Climatological Interpretation of Japanese Vegetation Zones. Springer; 1977. pp. 21–30.
Mori AS. Environmental controls on the causes and functional consequences of tree species diversity. J. Ecol. 2018;106:113–125.
Suzuki SN, Ishihara MI, Hidaka A. Regional-scale directional changes in abundance of tree species along a temperature gradient in Japan. Glob. Chan. Biol. 2015;21:3436–3444. PubMed
Hara M. Analysis of seedling banks of a climax beech forest: Ecological importance of seedling sprouts. Vegetatio. 1987;71:67–74.
Homma K. Effects of snow pressure on growth form and life history of tree species in Japanese beech forest. J. Veg. Sci. 1997;8:781–788.
Gansert D. Treelines of the Japanese Alps—altitudinal distribution and species composition under contrasting winter climates. Flora. 2004;199:143–156.
Hukusima T, et al. New phytosociological classification of beech forests in Japan. Jpn. J. Ecol. 1995;45:79–98.
Matsui T, et al. Probability distributions, vulnerability and sensitivity in Fagus crenata forests following predicted climate changes in Japan. J. Veg. Sci. 2004;15:605–614.
Johnson DJ, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Comita LS. Abiotic niche partitioning and negative density dependence drive tree seedling survival in a tropical forest. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2017;284:20172210. PubMed PMC
Ishihara MI, et al. Forest stand structure, composition, and dynamics in 34 sites over Japan. Ecol. Res. 2011;26:1007–1008.
Law R, et al. Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: Insights from point process theory. J. Ecol. 2009;97:616–628.
Wright SJ, et al. Reproductive size thresholds in tropical trees: Variation among individuals, species and forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 2005;21:307–315.
Zhu Y, Comita LS, Hubbell SP, Ma K. Conspecific and phylogenetic density-dependent survival differs across life stages in a tropical forest. J. Ecol. 2015;103:957–966.
Ripley BD. Spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. In: Legendre P, Legendre L, editors. Develoments in Numerical Ecology. Springer; 1987. pp. 407–429.
Wiegand T, Moloney KA. Handbook of Spatial Point-Pattern Analysis in Ecology. CRC Press; 2013.
Loosmore NB, Ford ED. Statistical inference using the G or K point pattern spatial statistics. Ecology. 2006;87:1925–1931. PubMed
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2020).
Baddeley A, Turner R. spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns. J. Stat. Soft. 2005;12:1–42.
Wills C, Condit R, Foster RB, Hubbell SP. Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. PNAS. 1997;94:1252–1257. PubMed PMC
Givnish TJ. On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J. Ecol. 1999;87:193–210.
Fibich P, Vítová A, Lepš J. Interaction between habitat limitation and dispersal limitation is modulated by species life history and external conditions: A stochastic matrix model approach. Comm. Ecol. 2018;19:9–20.
Miyawaki A. A vegetation ecological view of the Japanese archipelago. Bull. Inst. Environ. Sci. Technol. Yokohama Natl. Univ. 1984;11:85–101.
Mori AS, et al. Community assembly processes shape an altitudinal gradient of forest biodiversity. Glo. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013;22:878–888.
Grime JP. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. Wiley; 2001.
Brown C, Law R, Illian JB, Burslem DFRP. Linking ecological processes with spatial and non-spatial patterns in plant communities. J. Ecol. 2011;99:1402–1414.
Bastias CC, et al. Species richness influences the spatial distribution of trees in European forests. Oikos. 2020;129:380–390.
Hülsmann L, Chisholm RA, Hartig F. Is variation in conspecific negative density dependence driving tree diversity patterns at large scales? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021;36:151–163. PubMed
Damgaard C, Weiner J. It’s about time: A critique of macroecological inferences concerning plant competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017;32:86–87. PubMed
Murata I, et al. Effects of sika deer (Cervus nippon) and dwarf bamboo (Sasamorpha borealis) on seedling emergence and survival in cool-temperate mixed forests in the Kyushu Mountains. J. For. Res. 2009;14:296–301.
Ackerly DD, et al. The geography of climate change: Implications for conservation biogeography. Divers. Distrib. 2010;16:476–487.