• This record comes from PubMed

Choosing the Most Efficacious and Safe Oral Treatment for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

. 2022 Jul ; 8 (4) : 1072-1089. [epub] 20210922

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Network Meta-Analysis

Links

PubMed 34563481
DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.011
PII: S2405-4569(21)00226-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources

CONTEXT: The choice of the most efficacious drug for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder (IOAB) remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this network meta-analysis was to determine the most efficacious oral antimuscarinic or β-adrenoceptor agonist accounting for adverse events for the management of IOAB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive electronic search was done in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Ovid for studies in any language in February 2021 considering the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included all randomized controlled trials assessing oral antimuscarinics or β-adrenoceptor agonists for the treatment of IOAB. We determined the effect of specific bothersome symptoms separately. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fifty-four articles were included in our analysis. The most efficacious agents considering the evaluated outcomes were oxybutynin 15 mg/d in reducing incontinence episodes, imidafenacin 0.5 mg/d together with solifenacin 10 and 5 mg/d in reducing micturition episodes, fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg/d as well as solifenacin 10 mg/d in reducing urgency episodes, imidafenacin 0.5 mg/d and solifenacin 10 mg/d in reducing urgency urinary incontinence episodes, and solifenacin 10 mg/d, vibegron 50 mg/d, and fesoterodine 8 mg/d in improving the voided volume. Gastrointestinal problems, especially due to antimuscarinic agents, were the most prevalent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, there is only minimal difference between the efficacy of oral antimuscarinics and that of β-adrenoceptor agonists. Although finding the best medication for all is impossible, finding the best treatment for every individual patient can be done by considering the efficacy of a medicine for the most bothersome symptom(s) in balance with drug-specific adverse events. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study aimed to find the most efficient oral medication to treat overactive bladder, taking into consideration the adverse events. Based on our study, there is a minimal difference in the efficacy between the two major drug classes used to treat overactive bladder. Gastrointestinal problems were the most common adverse events in medical treatment of overactive bladder. Selection of the best treatment is possible through shared decision-making between the doctor and the patient based on the patient's most bothersome symptom. We provide a framework for physicians to facilitate shared decision-making with each individual patient.

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic; Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan; European Association of Urology research foundation Arnhem The Netherlands

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA

Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran; Student Research Committee Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

References provided by Crossref.org

Newest 20 citations...

See more in
Medvik | PubMed

The placebo and nocebo effects in functional urology

. 2022 Mar ; 19 (3) : 171-189. [epub] 20211223

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...