Health system efficiency in OECD countries: dynamic network DEA approach
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RO/2020/05
internal grant agency of fame tomas bata university in zlin
PubMed
34642864
PubMed Central
PMC8513208
DOI
10.1186/s13561-021-00337-9
PII: 10.1186/s13561-021-00337-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- DNDEA, Data envelopment analysis, Efficiency, OECD, Public health,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: In recent years, measuring and evaluating the efficiency of health systems has been explored in the context of seeking resources to ensure the sustainability of 'countries' health and social systems and addressing various crises in the health sector. The study aims to quantify and compare the efficiency of OECD health systems in 2000, 2008, and 2016. The contribution to research in the field of efficiency in the healthcare system can be seen in the application of Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DNDEA), which help us to analyse not only the overall efficiency of the healthcare system but analyse the overall efficiency as the result of the efficiencies of individual interconnected areas (public and medical care area). By applying the DNDEA model, we can realise the analysis not only within one year, but we can find out if the measures and improvements taken in the healthcare sector have a positive impact on its efficiency in a later period (eight-year interval). METHODS: The analysis focuses on assessing the efficiency of the health systems of OECD countries over three periods: 2000, 2008, and 2016. Data for this study were derived from the existing OECD database, which provides aggregated data on OECD countries on a comparable basis. In this way, it was possible to compare different countries whose national health statistics may have their characteristics. The input-oriented Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis model was used for data processing. The efficiency of OECD health systems has been analysed and evaluated comprehensively and also separately in two divisions: public health sub-division and medical care sub-division. The analysis combines the application of conventional and unconventional methods of measuring efficiency in the health sector. RESULTS: The results for the public health sub-division, medical care sub-division and overall health system for OECD countries under the assumption of constant returns to scale indicate that the average overall efficiency was 0.8801 in 2000, 0.8807 in 2008 and 0.8472 in 2016. The results of the input-oriented model with the assumption of constant returns to scale point to the overall average efficiency of health systems at the level of 0.8693 during the period. According to the Malmquist Index results, the OECD countries improved the efficiency over the years, with performance improvements of 19% in the public health division and 8% in the medical care division. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study are beneficial for health policymakers to assess and compare health systems in countries and to develop strategic national and regional health plans. Similarly, the result will support the development of international benchmarks in this area. The issue of health efficiency is an intriguing one that could be usefully explored in further research. A greater focus on combining non-parametric and parametric models could produce interesting findings for further research. The consistency in the publication and updating of the data on health statistics would help us establish a greater degree of accuracy.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Gavurova B, Kocisova K, Sopko J. An analysis of health spending: trends in selected countries. Int J Appl Bus Econ Res. 2017;15(9):1–12.
Cylus J, Papanicolas I, Smith P.C. Using data envelopment analysis to address the challenges of comparing health system efficiency. Global Policy. 2017;8:60–8. 10.1111/1758-5899.12212.
Maynard A, Bloor K. Health care reform: informing difficult choices. Int J Health Plan Manag. 1995;b10(4):247–64. PubMed
Collins C, Green A, Hunter D. Health sector reform and the interpretation of policy context. Health policy. 1999;47(1):69–83. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00003-2. PubMed DOI
Ozcan YA. Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation. 2nd Edition. US: Springer; 2014.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization. Available from https://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 9 Feb 2020.
World Health Organization . Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. 2018. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272596. Accessed 9 Feb 2020.
Cylus J, Papanicolas I, Smith P.C. eds. Health system efficiency: how to make measurement matter for policy and management. Health policy series. 46 European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium. ISBN 9789289050418. PubMed
Hollingsworth B, Smith P. Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis. Appl Econ Lett. 2003;10(11):733–735. doi: 10.1080/1350485032000133381. DOI
Stefko R, Gavurova B, Kocisova K. Healthcare efficiency assessment using DEA analysis in the Slovak Republic. Heal Econ Rev. 2018;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0191-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Singaroyan R, Seed CA, Egdell RM. Is a target culture in health care always compatible with efficient use of resources? A cost-effectiveness analysis of an intervention to achieve thrombolysis targets. J Public Health, 2006;28(1):31–4. 10.1093/pubmed/fdi072. PubMed
Mobley LR, Magnussen J. The impact of managed care penetration and hospital quality on efficiency in hospital staffing. J Health Care Finance. 2002;28(4):24–42. PubMed
Helling DK, Nelson KM, Ramirez JE, Tammy LH. Kaiser Permanente Colorado region pharmacy department: innovative leader in pharmacy practice. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2006;46(1):67–76. doi: 10.1331/154434506775268580. PubMed DOI
Retzlaff-Roberts D, Chang CF, Rubin RM. Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries. Health policy. 2004;69(1):55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.002. PubMed DOI
Bhat VN. Institutional arrangements and efficiency of health care delivery systems. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(3):215–222. doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0294-1. PubMed DOI
Adang EM, Borm GF. Is there an association between economic performance and public satisfaction in health care? Eur J Health Econ. 2007;8(3):279–285. doi: 10.1007/s10198-007-0045-6. PubMed DOI
Li HC, Mirmirani S, Ilacqua JA. Health care efficiency in transition economies: an application of data envelopment analysis. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 2008;7(2), Health Care Efficiency In Transition Economies: An Application Of Data Envelopment Analysis, 7, 2. 10.19030/iber.v7i2.3221.
Zeng W, Shepard DS, Chilingerian J, Avila-Figueroa C. How much can we gain from improved efficiency? An examination of performance of national HIV/AIDS programs and its determinants in low-and middle-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-74. PubMed DOI PMC
Medeiros J, Schwierz C. Efficiency estimates of health care systems (No. 549). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission; 2015.
Kohl S, Schoenfelder J, Fügener A, Brunner JO. The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health care management science. 2018;23(1):1–43. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9443-9. PubMed DOI
Blendon RJ, Kim M, Benson JM. The public versus the World Health Organization on health system performance. Health Aff. 2001;20(3):10–20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.10. PubMed DOI
Blendon RJ, Leitman R, Morrison I, Donelan K. Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Aff. 1990;9(2):185–192. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185. PubMed DOI
Grubaugh SG, Santerre RE. Comparing the performance of health care systems: an alternative approach. South Econ J. 1994;60(4):1030–1042. doi: 10.2307/1060439. DOI
Contoyannis P, Jones AM. Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle. J Health Econ. 2004;23(5):965–995. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.02.001. PubMed DOI
Shaw JW, Horrace WC, Vogel RJ. The determinants of life expectancy: an analysis of the OECD health data. South Econ J. 2005;71(4):768–783. doi: 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2005.tb00675.x. DOI
Anderson GF, Hurst J, Hussey PS, Jee-Hughes M. Health spending and outcomes: trends in OECD countries, 1960–1998: do Americans get more from their health care system for the larger share of wealth they spend on health? Health Aff. 2000;19(3):150–157. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.150. PubMed DOI
Afonso A, Aubyn MS. Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. J Appl Econ. 2005;8(2):227–246. doi: 10.1080/15140326.2005.12040626. DOI
Luoma K. Räty T. 2006.
Spinks J, Hollingsworth B. Cross-country comparisons of technical efficiency of health production: a demonstration of pitfalls. Appl Econ. 2009;41(4):417–427. doi: 10.1080/00036840701604354. DOI
Woolf SH, Aron LY. The US health disadvantage relative to other high-income countries: findings from a National Research Council/Institute of Medicine report. Jama. 2013;309(8):771–772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.91. PubMed DOI
Ozcan YA, Khushalani J. Assessing efficiency of public health and medical care provision in OECD countries after a decade of reform. CEJOR. 2017;25(2):325–343. doi: 10.1007/s10100-016-0440-0. DOI
Kawaguchi H, Tone K, Tsutsui M. Estimation of the efficiency of Japanese hospitals using a dynamic and network data envelopment analysis model. Health care management science. 2014;17(2):101–112. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9248-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Rezapour A, Azar FE, Zadeh NY, Roumiani Y, Faradonbeh SB. Technical efficiency and resources allocation in university hospitals in Tehran, 2009–2012. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29:266. PubMed PMC
Ineveld M, Oostrum J, Vermeulen R, Steenhoek A, Klundert J. Productivity and quality of Dutch hospitals during system reform. Health care management science. 2015:1–12. PubMed PMC
Mujasi PN, Asbu EZ, Puing-Junoy J. How efficient are referral hospitals in Uganda? A data envelopment analysis and tobit regression approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1472-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Kontodimopoulos N, Nanos P, Niakas D. Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece. Health policy. 2006;76(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.006. PubMed DOI
Dimas G, Goula A, Soulis S. Productive performance and its components in Greek public hospitals. Oper Res. 2012;12(1):15–27. doi: 10.1007/s12351-010-0082-2. DOI
Lewis HF, Sexton TR. Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organisations with complex internal structure. Comput Oper Res. 2004;31(9):1365–1410. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00095-9. DOI
Tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;197(1):243–52. 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027.
Mitropoulos P. Production and quality performance of healthcare services in EU countries during the economic crisis. Oper Res. 2019:1–17.
Mahate A, Hamidi S, Akinci F. Measuring the effect of size on technical efficiency of the United Arab Emirates hospitals. Global J Health Sci. 2016;9(3):116. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v9n3p116. DOI
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8. DOI
Farell MJ. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1957;120(3):253–90, 10.2307/2343100.
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci. 1984;30(9):1078–1092. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078. DOI
Debreu G. The coefficient of resource utilization. The Econometric Society. 1951;19(3):273–292. doi: 10.2307/1906814. DOI
Shepherd RW. Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press; 1970.
Afriat SN. Efficiency estimation of production functions. Int Econ Rev. 1972;13(3):568–598. doi: 10.2307/2525845. DOI
Hwang SN. Lee HS. Zhu J. Handbook of operations analytics using data envelopment analysis: Springer; 2016.
Cook WD, Zhu J. (Eds.). Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of modeling internal structure and network (Vol. 208). Springer; 2014.
Zhu J. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. 2003. 10.1007/978-1-4757-4246-6.
Zhu J. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets (Vol. 213). Springer; 2014.
Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis: a handbook of models and methods (Vol. 221). Springer; 2015.
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. 2007.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G. Network Dea II. In Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 307–327). Boston: Springer; 2014.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CK. The measurement of efficiency of production (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;143(1):32–41. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1. DOI
Mathers CD, Murray CJ, Salomon JA. Methods for measuring healthy life expectancy. Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. 2003:437–70.
Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Chatterji S, Sadana R, Ustun TB, Murray CJ. Quantifying individual levels of health: definitions, concepts and measurement issues. Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debate, Methods, and Empiricism. 2003:301–18.
Tunega M. Širší pohľad na efektívnosť slovenského zdravotníctva. INEKO, 2013. http://www.ihealth.sk/analyzy/1412_sirsi-pohlad-na-efektivnost-slovenskeho-zdravotnictva.
OECD . Austria: country health profile 2019, state of health in the EU, OECD publishing. Brussels: Paris/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019.
Inchley J, Currie D. Growing up unequal: gender and socio-economic differences in young people's health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey (No. 7). World Health Organization; 2016.
Keskimaki I, Tynkkynen L K, Reissell E, Koivusalo M, Syrja V, Vuorenkoski L, Karanikolos M. Finland: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition. 2019;21(2):1–166. PubMed
OECD. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Finland 2005, OECD reviews of health systems. Paris: OECD publishing;2005.
OECD . Finland: country health profile 2019, state of health in the EU, OECD publishing. Brussels: Paris/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019.
OECD . Greece: country health profile 2019. State of Health in the EU: OECD Publishing, Paris; 2019.
Economou C, Kaitelidou D, Karanikolos M, Maresso A. Greece: health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2017;19(5):1–166. PubMed
Auraaen A, Fujisawa R, de Lagasnerie G, Paris V. How OECD health systems define the range of good and services to be financed collectively (No. 90). OECD Publishing; 2016.
Barasa E W, Molyneux S, English M, Cleary, S. Setting healthcare priorities at the macro and meso levels: a framework for evaluation. Int J health policy Manag. 2015;4(11):719. PubMed PMC
OECD . OECD reviews of public health: Chile: a healthier tomorrow. OECD Publishing, Paris: OECD Reviews of Public Health; 2019.
Chao D, Hashimoto H, Kondo N. Dynamic impact of social stratification and social influence on smoking prevalence by gender: an agent-based model. Soc Sci Med. 2015;147:280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.041. PubMed DOI
OECD . OECD reviews of public health: Japan: a healthier tomorrow. OECD Publishing, Paris: OECD Reviews of Public Health; 2019.
OECD. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Mexico 2016, OECD reviews of health systems. Paris: OECD publishing; 2016.
Moreno VAG, Patrinos HA. Indigenous peoples and poverty in Mexico (No. 64767, pp. 1–2). The World Bank; 2011.
Servan-Mori E, Torres-Pereda P, Orozco E, Sosa-Rubí SG. An explanatory analysis of economic and health inequality changes among Mexican indigenous people, 2000-2010. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-21. PubMed DOI PMC
Tatar M, Mollahaliloğlu S, Şahin B, Aydin S, Hernández-QUEVEDO AMC. Turkey: health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2011;13(6):1–186. PubMed
OECD . OECD reviews of health care quality: Turkey 2014: raising standards. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: OECD Publishing, Paris; 2014.
OECD . OECD health policy overview: health policy in Denmark. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
OECD . OECD health policy overview: health policy in Australia. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
Villalobos-Cid M, Chacón M, Zitko P, Instroza-Ponta M. A new strategy to evaluate technical efficiency in hospitals using homogeneous groups of Casemix. J Med Syst. 2016;40(4):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0458-9. PubMed DOI
Li Q, Maasoumi E, Racine JS. A non-parametric test for equality of distributions with mixed categorical and continuous data. J Econ. 2009;148(2):186–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.10.007. DOI
Efficiency evaluation of 28 health systems by MCDA and DEA
Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems