Carcass Yields and Physical-Chemical Meat Quality Characteristics of Namibian Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus) as Influenced by Sex and Muscle

. 2021 Oct 01 ; 10 (10) : . [epub] 20211001

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34681396

Grantová podpora
THRIP/64/19/04/2017 Department of Trade and Industry- South Africa
84633 Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa

This study determined the carcass yields of red hartebeest from Namibia and compared the physical-chemical meat quality characteristics of six different muscles (biceps femoris, infraspinatus, longissimus thoracis et lumborum, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and supraspinatus) for both males and females. Red hartebeest males were heavier (133.92 kg) than females (114.20 kg) but the average dressing percentage did not differ between the two sexes. Muscles from females had a lower mean shear force value of 3.59 kg/1.27 cm ø, compared to males (4.23 kg/1.27 cm ø). The most tender muscle was the infraspinatus of the female treatment group, while the semimembranosus of the male treatment group was the least tender muscle. Drip loss, cooking loss and L* (lightness) values were not affected by sex. The largest hue angle was observed in the semitendinosus muscle of the female treatment group (28.94°), and it was thus the lightest red muscle. The highest chroma values (17.3) were observed in the semimembranosus muscle. Muscle protein content averaged 20.5% over all treatment combinations, and the mean intra-muscular fat content for both male and female muscles was low (2.4%). The shoulder muscles, infraspinatus and supraspinatus, of the females had the highest fat content (2.7%). The results indicate that red hartebeest meat should be market according to specific muscles and that sex of the animals need not be considered during marketing.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Joubert D. Bush Encroachment—Prevention Is Better than Cure. Newsletter of the Conservation Association of Namibia; Windhoek, Namibia: 2006. Workshop report.

Ledger H.P., Sachs R., Smith N.S. Wild-life and food production. World Rev. Anim. Prod. 1967;3:13–36.

Von la Chevallerie M. Meat quality of seven wild ungulate species. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 1972;2:101–103.

Hoffman L.C., Wiklund E. Game and venison—Meat for the modern consumer. Meat Sci. 2006;74:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.005. PubMed DOI

Hoffman L.C., Cawthorn D.-M. What is the role and contribution of meat from wildlife in providing high quality protein for consumption? Anim. Front. 2012;2:40–53. doi: 10.2527/af.2012-0061. DOI

Cawthorn D.-M., Hoffman L.C. The role of traditional and non-traditional meat animals in feeding a growing and evolving world. Anim. Front. 2014;4:6–12. doi: 10.2527/af.2014-0027. DOI

Cawthorn D.-M., Hoffman L.C. The bushmeat and food security nexus: A global account of the contributions, conundrums, and ethical collisions. Food Res. Int. 2015;76:906–925. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.025. DOI

Cawthorn D.-M., Hoffman L.C. Controversial cuisine: A global account of the demand, supply and acceptance of “unconventional” and “exotic” meats. Meat Sci. 2016;120:19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.017. PubMed DOI

Minin E.D., Clements H.S., Correia R.A., Cortes-Capano G., Fink C., Haukka A., Hausman A., Kulkarni R., Bradshaw C.J.A. Review: Consequences of recreational hunting for biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. One Earth. 2021;4:239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.014. DOI

Coad L., Fa J.E., Abernethy K., Van Vleit N., Santamaria C., Wilkie D., El Bizri H.R., Ingram D.J., Cawthorn D.-M., Nasi R. Towards a Sustainable, Participatory and Inclusive Wild Meat Sector. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR); Bogor, Indonesia: 2019. DOI

Tensen L. Review: Under what circumstances can wildlife farming benefit species conservation? Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2016;6:286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2016.03.007. DOI

Erasmus S.W., Hoffman L.C. What is meat in South Africa? Anim. Front. 2017;7:71–75. doi: 10.2527/af.2017.0449. DOI

Hoffman L.C. Meat quality attributes of night-cropped impala (Aepyceros melampus) S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2000;30:133–137. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v30i2.3862. DOI

Orenstein R. Wildlife Markets and COVID-19. Humane Society International; Washington, DC, USA: 2020.

Booth H., Clark M., Milner-Gulland E.J., Amponsah-Mensah K., Antunes A.P., Brittain S., Castilho L.C., Campos-Silva J.V., Constantino P.L., Li Y., et al. Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems. Curr. Biol. 2021:1788–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.079. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoffman L.C., Smit K., Muller M. Chemical characteristics of red hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus caama) meat. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;40:221–228. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v40i3.6. DOI

Zaburnis E.A., Cross R. A Field Guide to Antelope of South Africa. Natal Wildlife Society; Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: 1974.

Van der Waal C., Dekker B. Game ranching in the Northern Province of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2000;30:151–156.

Barnes J.I., De Jager J.L.V. Economic and financial incentives for wild-life use on private land in Namibia and the implications for policy. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 1996;26:37–46.

Brown C. Notes on Wildlife Population Estimates. Namibia Nature Foundation; Windhoek, Namibia: 2007.

Furstenburg J. S. A. Game and Hunt. JLO Publishing; Pretoria, South Africa: 2008. The hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus)

Kok O.B. Miscellaneous Publication, No. 4. Nature Conservation; South Africa: 1975. The red hartebeest.

Von la Chevallerie M. Meat production from wild ungulates. Proc. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1970;9:73–78.

Mostert R., Hoffman L.C. Effect of sex on the meat quality characteristics and chemical composition of kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), an African antelope species. Food Chem. 2007;104:565–570. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.12.006. DOI

Lindsey P.A., Roulet P.A., Romanach S.S. Economic and conservation significance of trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2007;134:455–469. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.005. DOI

Saayman M., Van der Merwe P., Saayman A. The economic impact of trophy hunting in the south African wildlife industry. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018;16:e00510. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00510. PubMed DOI PMC

Bureš D., Bartoň L., Kudrnáčová E., Kotrba R., Hoffman L.C. The effect of barley and lysine supplementation on the longissimus lumborum meat quality of pasture-raised fallow deer (Dama dama) Foods. 2020;9:1255. doi: 10.3390/foods9091255. PubMed DOI PMC

Needham T., Engels R.A., Hoffman L.C. Sensory characteristics of male impala (Aepyceros melampus) meat, produced under varying production systems and nutrition. Foods. 2021;10:619. doi: 10.3390/foods10030619. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoffman L.C., Muller M., Schutte D.W., Calitz F.J., Crafford K. Consumer expectations, perceptions and purchasing of South African game meat. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2005;35:33–42.

Neethling N.E., Suman S.P., Sigge G.O., Hoffman L.C., Hunt M.C. Exogenous and endogenous factors influencing color of fresh meat from ungulates. Meat Muscle Biol. 2017;1:253–275. doi: 10.22175/mmb2017.06.0032. DOI

Onyango C.A., Izumimoto M., Kutima P.M. Comparison of some physical and chemical properties of selected game meats. Meat Sci. 1998;49:117–125. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00116-2. PubMed DOI

Neethling J., Hoffman L.C., Muller M. Factors influencing the flavour of game meat: A review. Meat Sci. 2016;113:139–153. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.11.022. PubMed DOI

Hoffman L.C., Van Schalkwyk D.L., Muller M., Needham T., Van Rensburg B.J., McMillin K.W. Carcass yields and physiochemical meat quality characteristics of Namibian gemsbok (Oryx gazella) as influenced by muscle, gender and age. Meat Sci. 2020;169:108208. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108208. PubMed DOI

Van Schalkwyk D.L., Hoffman L.C. Guidelines for the Harvesting of Game for Meat Export. AgriPublishers; Windhoek, Namibia: 2010. [(accessed on 20 August 2021)]. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/79639.

AOAC . Official Method of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2002.

Lee C.M., Trevino B., Chaiyawat M. A simple and rapid solvent extraction method for determining total lipids in fish tissue. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 1996;79:487–492. PubMed

Honikel K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998;49:447–457. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5. PubMed DOI

Shapiro S.S., Wilk M.B. An analyses of variance test for normality (complete samples) Biometrika. 1965;52:591–611. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591. DOI

Hoffman L.C., Laubscher L.L. A comparison between the effects of day versus night cropping on the quality parameters of red hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus) meat. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2010;41:50–60. doi: 10.3957/056.041.0110. DOI

Shange N., Gouws P.A., Hoffman L.C. Changes in pH, colour and the microbiology of black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) muscle with normal and high (DFD) muscle pH. Meat Sci. 2019;147:13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.08.021. PubMed DOI

Hoffman L.C., Van Schalkwyk D.L., Muller N.M., Rensburg B.J., McMillin K.W. Carcass yields and physico-chemical meat quality characteristics of Namibian springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) as influenced by muscle, sex and age. Meat Muscle Biol. 2019;3:1–12. doi: 10.22175/mmb2019.05.0016. DOI

Hoffman L.C., Van Schalkwyk S., Muller M. Quality characteristics of blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) meat. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2011;41:210–213. doi: 10.3957/056.041.0208. DOI

Needham T., Kotrba R., Hoffman L.C., Bureš D. Ante- and post-mortem strategies to improve the meat quality of high-value muscles harvested from farmed male common eland (Taurotragus oryx) Meat Sci. 2020;168:108183. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108183. PubMed DOI

Briskey E.J. Proceedings Meat Tenderness Symposium. Campbell Soup Company; Camden, NJ, USA: 1963. Influence of ante- and post-mortem handling practices on properties of muscle which are related to tenderness; pp. 195–223.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...