The advent of high-resolution imaging has made data on surface shape widespread. Methods for the analysis of shape based on landmarks are well established but high-resolution data require a functional approach. The starting point is a systematic and consistent description of each surface shape and a method for creating this is described. Three innovative forms of analysis are then introduced. The first uses surface integration to address issues of registration, principal component analysis and the measurement of asymmetry, all in functional form. Computational issues are handled through discrete approximations to integrals, based in this case on appropriate surface area weighted sums. The second innovation is to focus on sub-spaces where interesting behaviour such as group differences are exhibited, rather than on individual principal components. The third innovation concerns the comparison of individual shapes with a relevant control set, where the concept of a normal range is extended to the highly multivariate setting of surface shape. This has particularly strong applications to medical contexts where the assessment of individual patients is very important. All of these ideas are developed and illustrated in the important context of human facial shape, with a strong emphasis on the effective visual communication of effects of interest.

Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Mathematics and Statistics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Olin Business School Washington University in St Louis St Louis MO USA

School of Mathematics and Statistics The University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

See more in PubMed

Adler, D. & Murdoch, D. (2019) rgl: 3D Visualization Using OpenGL.

Armann, R. & Balthoff, I. (2012) Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities and when in doubt, he is a male. Vision Research, 63, 69–80. PubMed

Asimov, D. (1985) The grand tour: A tool for viewing multidimensional data. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 6(1), 128–143.

Bedrick, E.J. (2019) Data reduction prior to inference: Are there consequences of comparing groups using a t‐test based on principal component scores? Biometrics,, 76, 508–517. PubMed

Bock, M.T. & Bowman, A.W. (2006) On the measurement and analysis of asymmetry with applications to facial modelling. Applied Statistics, 55, 77–91.

Bookstein, F.L. (1989) Principal warps: Thin‐plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6), 567–585.

Bookstein, F.L. (1997) Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bowman, A.W. & Bock, M.T. (2006) Exploring variation in three‐dimensional shape data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 524–541.

Brignell, C. , Dryden, I. & Browne, W. (2015) Covariance weighted procrustes analysis. Riemannian computing in computer vision. Berlin: Springer, pp. 189–209.

Bruce, V. , Burton, A.M. , Hanna, E. , Healey, P. , Mason, O. , Coombes, A. . et al. (1993) Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception, 22(2), 131–152. PubMed

Claes, P. , Walters, M. , Shriver, M.D. , Puts, D. , Gibson, G. , Clement, J. et al. (2012) Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3d facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics. Journal of Anatomy, 221(2), 97–114. PubMed PMC

Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K. (2016) Statistical shape analysis, with applications in R, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.

Duchon, J. (1977) Constructive theory of functions of several variables. Berlin: Springer, pp. 85–100.

Frelat, M.A. , Katina, S. , Weber, G.W. & Bookstein, F.L. (2012) A novel geometric morphometric approach to the study of long bone shape variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 149(4), 628–638. PubMed

Gunz, P. , Mitteroecker, P. & Bookstein, F.L. (2005) Semilandmarks in three dimensions. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Berlin: Springer, pp. 73–98.

Hammond, P. , Hutton, T.J. , Allanson, J.E. , Campbell, L.E. , Hennekam, R. , Holden, S. et al. (2004) 3d analysis of facial morphology. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 126(4), 339–348. PubMed

Jackson, C.H. (2008) Displaying uncertainty with shading. The American Statistician, 62(4), 340–347.

Johnstone, I.M. (2001) On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal components analysis. Annals of Statistics, 29(2), 295–327.

Kent, J.T. & Mardia, K.V. (2001) Shape, procrustes tangent projections and bilateral symmetry. Biometrika, 88(2), 469–485.

Koenderink, J. (1990) Solid shape. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.

Koenderink, J. & van Doorn, A. (1992) Surface shape and curvature scales. Image and Vision Computing, 10(8), 557–564.

Mao, Z. , Ju, X. , Siebert, J.P. , Cockshott, W.P. & Ayoub, A. (2006) Constructing dense correspondences for the analysis of 3d facial morphology. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(6), 597–608.

Mardia, K.V. , Bookstein, F.L. & Moreton, I.J. (2000) Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika, 87(2), 285–300.

Mitteroecker, P. & Bookstein, F. (2008) The evolutionary role of modularity and integration in the hominoid cranium. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 62(4), 943–958. PubMed

Mitteroecker, P. , Gunz, P. , Bernhard, M. , Schaefer, K. & Bookstein, F.L. (2004) Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46(6), 679–698. PubMed

Paulsen, R.R. & Hilger, K.B. (2003) Shape modelling using markov random field restoration of point correspondences. Biennial International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, pp. 1–12. PubMed

Ramsay, J.O. & Silverman, B.W. (1997) Functional Data Analysis. New York: Springer.

R Core Team . (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reeger, J. , Fornberg, B. & Watts, M. (2016) Numerical quadrature over smooth, closed surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2194), 20160401. PubMed PMC

Rohlf, F.J. & Bookstein, F.L. (2003) Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Systematic Biology, 52(1), 66–69. PubMed

Thompson, D.W. (1917) On Growth and Form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Vittert, L. , Bowman, A.W. & Katina, S. (2019) Statistical models for manifold data with applications to the human face. Annals of Applied Statistics, 13(4), 2539–2563. PubMed PMC

Vittert, L. , Katina, S. , Ayoub, A. , Khambay, B. & Bowman, A. (2018) Assessing the outcome of orthognathic surgery by three‐dimensional soft tissue analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 47(12), 1587–1595. PubMed PMC

Waddington, J.L. , Katina, S.K. , O’Tuathaigh, C.M.P. & Bowman, A.W. (2017) Translational genetic modelling of 3d craniofacial dysmorphology: Elaborating the facial phenotype of neurodev elopmental disorders through the "prism" of schizophrenia. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 4(4), 322–330. PubMed PMC

Wilkinson, C. (2004) Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zeileis, A. , Hornik, K. & Murrell, P. (2009) Escaping rgbland: Selecting colors for statistical graphics. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(9), 3259–3270.