Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
Grantová podpora
602299
European Community's 7th Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013
PubMed
34849744
PubMed Central
PMC9071070
DOI
10.1093/europace/euab260
PII: 6446242
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Appropriate shock, Benefit, Electrocardiogram, Heart failure, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Mortality, Primary prevention, Q wave, QT interval,
- MeSH
- defibrilátory implantabilní * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhlá srdeční smrt epidemiologie etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- primární prevence metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- srdeční arytmie diagnóza etiologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky kontrolované MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
AIM: The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary prophylactic ICD population to assess the predictive value of ECG in terms of ICD benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms from 1477 ICD patients and 700 control patients (EU-CERT-ICD; non-randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064192), who met ICD implantation criteria but did not receive the device, were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In ICD patients, the co-primary outcome of first appropriate shock was used. Mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.1 years to death and 2.3 ± 1.2 years to the first appropriate shock. Pathological Q waves were associated with decreased mortality in ICD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.84; P < 0.01] and patients with pathological Q waves had significantly more benefit from ICD (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.93; P = 0.03). QTc interval increase taken as a continuous variable was associated with both mortality and appropriate shock incidence, but commonly used cut-off values, were not statistically significantly associated with either of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pathological Q waves were a strong ECG predictor of ICD benefit in primary prophylactic ICD patients. Excess mortality among Q wave patients seems to be due to arrhythmic death which can be prevented by ICD.
Biocenter Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Division of Cardiology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Division of Cardiology University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center Göttingen Germany
DZHK partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Medical Physiology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands
National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS. et al.; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877–83. PubMed
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R. et al.; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:225–37. PubMed
Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NAM, Anderson KP. et al.; Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) Investigators. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J MedMed 2004;350:2151–8. PubMed
Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M. et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. Europace 2006;8:746–837. PubMed
Raatikainen MJP, Arnar DO, Merkely B, Nielsen JC, Hindricks G, Heidbuchel H. et al. A decade of information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2017;19:ii1–90. PubMed
Shen L, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, Claggett BL, Barlera S, Cleland JGF. et al. Declining risk of sudden death in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2017;377:41–51. PubMed
Bergau L, Willems R, Sprenkeler DJ, Fischer TH, Flevari P, Hasenfuß G. et al. Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality—a prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy. Int J Cardiol 2018;272:102–7. PubMed
Dagres N, Hindricks G.. Devices for management of sudden cardiac death: successes, challenges and perspectives. Int J Cardiol 2017;237:34–7. PubMed
Køber L, Thune JJ, Nielsen JC, Haarbo J, Videbæk L, Korup E. et al.; DANISH Investigators. Defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. N Engl J MedMed 2016;375:1221–30. PubMed
Pelli A, Kenttä TV, Junttila MJ, Bergau L, Zabel M, Malik M. et al. Electrocardiogram as a predictor of survival without appropriate shocks in primary prophylactic ICD patients: a retrospective multi-center study. Int J Cardiol 2020;309:78–83. PubMed
Zabel M, Willems R, Lubinski A, Bauer A, Brugada J, Conen D. et al.; EU-CERT-ICD Study Investigators. Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study. Eur Heart J [Internet] 2020;41:3437–47. PubMed PMC
Holkeri A, Eranti A, Kenttä TV, Noponen K, Haukilahti MAE, Seppänen T. et al. Experiences in digitizing and digitally measuring a paper-based ECG archive. J Electrocardiol 2018;51:74–81. PubMed
Haukilahti MAE, Eranti A, Kenttä T, Huikuri HV.. QRS fragmentation patterns representing myocardial scar need to be separated from benign normal variants: hypotheses and proposal for morphology based classification. Front Physiol 2016;7:1–10. PubMed PMC
MacFarlane PW, Antzelevitch C, Haissaguerre M, Huikuri HV, Potse M, Rosso R. et al. The early repolarization pattern: a consensus paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:470–7. PubMed
Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Kerola T, Rissanen HA. et al. Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:704–10. PubMed
Anttonen O, Junttila MJ, Rissanen H, Reunanen A, Viitasalo M, Huikuri HV.. Prevalence and prognostic significance of short QT interval in a middle-aged Finnish population. Circulation 2007;116:714–20. PubMed
Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Gorgels A. et al.; Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:976–81. PubMed
Godsk P, Jensen JS, Abildstrøm SZ, Appleyard M, Pedersen S, Mogelvang R.. Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic Q-waves in a low-risk population. Europace 2012;14:1012–7. PubMed
Das MK, Suradi H, Maskoun W, Michael MA, Shen C, Peng J. et al. Fragmented wide QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a sign of myocardial scar and poor prognosis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008;1:258–68. PubMed
Bauer A, Klemm M, Rizas KD, Hamm W, von Stülpnagel L, Dommasch M. et al.; EU-CERT-ICD Investigators. Prediction of mortality benefit based on periodic repolarisation dynamics in patients undergoing prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator: a prospective, controlled, multicentre cohort study. Lancet 2019;394:1344–51. PubMed
Antoniou C-K, Dilaveris P, Manolakou P, Galanakos S, Magkas N, Gatzoulis K. et al. QT prolongation and malignant arrhythmia: how serious a problem? Eur Cardiol 2017;12:112–20. PubMed PMC
Stecker EC, Zargarian M, Dogra V, John BT, Kron J, McAnulty JH. et al. Native QRS duration predicts the occurrence of arrhythmic events in ICD recipients. Europace 2006;8:859–62. PubMed
Smit MD, Van Dessel PFHM, Rienstra M, Nieuwland W, Wiesfeld ACP, Tan ES. et al. Atrial fibrillation predicts appropriate shocks in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Europace 2006;8:566–72. PubMed
Brenyo A, Pietrasik G, Barsheshet A, Huang DT, Polonsky B, McNitt S. et al. QRS fragmentation and the risk of sudden cardiac death in MADIT II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:1343–8. PubMed
Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Panattoni G, Sergi D, Duro L. et al. Predictive value of fragmented QRS in primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2011;12:779–84. PubMed
Perino AC, Soofi M, Singh N, Aggarwal S, Froelicher V.. The long-term prognostic value of the Q wave criteria for prior myocardial infarction recommended in the universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2015;48:798–802. PubMed
Loring Z, Zareba W, McNitt S, Strauss DG, Wagner GS, Daubert JP.. ECG quantification of myocardial scar and risk stratification in MADIT-II. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2013;18:427–35. PubMed PMC
Strauss DG, Poole JE, Wagner GS, Selvester RH, Miller JM, Anderson J. et al. An ECG index of myocardial scar enhances prediction of defibrillator shocks: an analysis of the sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:38–45. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02064192