Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) is a common human neurobiological trait that is related to many areas of human life. This trait has recently received increased public interest. However, solid scientific research on SPS is lagging behind. Progress in this area is also hindered by a lack of comprehensive research tools suitable for a rapid assessment of SPS. Thus, the aim of this study was to offer a newly developed tool, the Sensory Processing Sensitivity Questionnaire (SPSQ), and to assess its psychometric properties and associations with emotional and relational variables measured during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found the tool to have good psychometric characteristics: high temporal stability (r = 0.95) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92; McDonald's ω = 0.92). The fit of the SPSQ bi-factor model was satisfactory: χ2 (88.0) = 506.141; p < 0.001; CFI = 0.993; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.070; SRMR = 0.039. Testing of configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance suggested that the SPSQ assesses SPS equivalently between males and females. The scale's validity was supported via a strong association with an existing SPS measure. Further, we observed higher total SPSQ scores among women, students and religious respondents, and we found that more sensitive respondents reported higher feelings of anxiety and more deterioration in relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, this study also identifies people with this trait as being potentially more vulnerable during periods of an increased presence of global stressors.

Department of Science Prague College of Psychosocial Studies Hekrova 805 149 00 Prague Czech Republic

Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacký University Olomouc 771 11 Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aron E., Aron A. Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Introversion and Emotionality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1997;73:345–368. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345. PubMed DOI

Aron E. The Highly Sensitive Person. Kensington Publishing Corp.; New York, NY, USA: 2013.

Boterberg S., Warreyn P. Making sense of it all: The impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2016;92:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.022. DOI

Aron E.N. Psychotherapy and the Highly Sensitive Person: Improving Outcomes for That Minority of People Who Are the Majority of Clients. Routledge; London, UK: 2011.

Benham G. The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2006;40:1433–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021. DOI

Liss M., Timmel L., Baxley K., Killingsworth P. Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2005;39:1429–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007. DOI

Acevedo B., Aron E., Pospos S., Jessen D. The functional highly sensitive brain: A review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018;373:20170161. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0161. PubMed DOI PMC

Hofmann S.G., Bitran S. Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. J. Anxiety Disord. 2007;21:944–954. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003. PubMed DOI PMC

Aron E.N., Aron A., Davies K.M. Adult shyness: The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2005;31:181–197. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271419. PubMed DOI

Ghanizadeh A. Sensory processing problems in children with ADHD, a systematic review. Psychiatry Investig. 2011;8:89–94. doi: 10.4306/pi.2011.8.2.89. PubMed DOI PMC

Evers A., Rasche J., Schabracq M.J. High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2008;15:189. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189. DOI

Acevedo B.P. The Highly Sensitive Brain. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. The basics of sensory processing sensitivity; pp. 1–15.

Lionetti F., Pastore M., Moscardino U., Nocentini A., Pluess K., Pluess M. Sensory Processing Sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. J. Res. Personal. 2019;81:138–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013. DOI

Andresen M., Goldmann P., Volodina A. Do overwhelmed expatriates intend to leave? The effects of sensory processing sensitivity, stress, and social capital on expatriates’ turnover intention. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2018;15:315–328. doi: 10.1111/emre.12120. DOI

Pluess M., Belsky J. Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychol. Bull. 2013;139:901. doi: 10.1037/a0030196. PubMed DOI

Rizzo-Sierra C.V., Leon-S M.E., Leon-Sarmiento F.E. Higher sensory processing sensitivity, introversion and ectomorphism: New biomarkers for human creativity in developing rural areas. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2012;3:159–162. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.98314. PubMed DOI PMC

Bridges D., Schendan H.E. Sensitive individuals are more creative. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019;142:186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.015. DOI

Aron E.N., Aron A., Jagiellowicz J. Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2012;16:262–282. doi: 10.1177/1088868311434213. PubMed DOI

Greven C.U., Lionetti F., Booth C., Aron E.N., Fox E., Schendan H.E., Pluess M., Bruining H., Acevedo B., Bijttebier P. Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019;98:287–305. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009. PubMed DOI

Smith H.L., Sriken J., Erford B.T. Clinical and research utility of the highly sensitive person scale. J. Ment. Health Couns. 2019;41:221–241. doi: 10.17744/mehc.41.3.03. DOI

Lionetti F., Aron A., Aron E.N., Burns G.L., Jagiellowicz J., Pluess M. Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Transl. Psychiatry. 2018;8:24. doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Ershova R.V., Yarmotz E.V., Koryagina T.M., Semeniak I.V., Shlyakhta D.A., Tarnow E. A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity. Electron. J. Gen. Med. 2018;15:em96. doi: 10.29333/ejgm/100634. DOI

Pluess M., Lionetti F., Aron E.N., Aron A. People differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An integrated theory and empirical evidence. PsyArXiv. 2020 doi: 10.31234/osf.io/w53yc. DOI

Brown C.E., Dunn W. Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile: User’s Manual. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX, USA: 2002.

Engel-Yeger B. Validating the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and examining its ability to screen sensory processing difficulties among Israeli people. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2012;75:321–329. doi: 10.4276/030802212X13418284515839. DOI

Tavassoli T., Hoekstra R.A., Baron-Cohen S. The Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ): Development and validation of a new sensory questionnaire for adults with and without autism. Mol. Autism. 2014;5:1–10. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-29. PubMed DOI PMC

Dixon E.A., Benham G., Sturgeon J.A., Mackey S., Johnson K.A., Younger J. Development of the Sensory Hypersensitivity Scale (SHS): A self-report tool for assessing sensitivity to sensory stimuli. J. Behav. Med. 2016;39:537–550. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9720-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Aykan S., Vatansever G., Doğanay-Erdoğan B., Kalaycıoğlu C. Development of sensory sensitivity scales (SeSS): Reliability and validity analyses. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2020;100:103612. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103612. PubMed DOI

Mehrabian A. A questionnaire measure of individual differences in stimulus screening and associated differences in arousability. Environ. Psychol. Nonverbal Behav. 1977;1:89–103. doi: 10.1007/BF01145458. DOI

Evans D.E., Rothbart M.K. Developing a model for adult temperament. J. Res. Personal. 2007;41:868–888. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.002. DOI

Duncan L.A., Schaller M., Park J.H. Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2009;47:541–546. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001. DOI

Pappas G., Kiriaze I., Giannakis P., Falagas M. Psychosocial consequences of infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009;15:743–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02947.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Taylor S., Landry C., Paluszek M., Fergus T.A., McKay D., Asmundson G.J. Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. J. Anxiety Disord. 2020;72:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232. PubMed DOI PMC

Trnka R., Lorencova R. Fear, anger, and media-induced trauma during the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Czech Republic. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy. 2020;12:546. doi: 10.1037/tra0000675. PubMed DOI

John O.P., Srivastava S. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Volume 2. University of California; Berkeley, CA, USA: 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives; pp. 102–138.

Forbush K.T., Wildes J.E., Pollack L.O., Dunbar D., Luo J., Patterson K., Petruzzi L., Pollpeter M., Miller H., Stone A. Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) Psychol. Assess. 2013;25:859. doi: 10.1037/a0032639. PubMed DOI

Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447. PubMed DOI

Lorenzo-Seva U., Timmerman M.E., Kiers H.A. The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2011;46:340–364. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.564527. PubMed DOI

Ruscio J., Roche B. Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychol. Assess. 2012;24:282. doi: 10.1037/a0025697. PubMed DOI

Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University; Evanston, IL, USA: 2019.

Team R.C. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2020.

Jackson D.L., Gillaspy J.A., Jr., Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychol. Methods. 2009;14:6. doi: 10.1037/a0014694. PubMed DOI

Schermelleh-Engel K., Moosbrugger H., Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online. 2003;8:23–74.

Hoe S.L. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. J. Quant. Methods. 2008;3:76.

Hooper D., Coughlan J.P., Mullen M.R. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods. 2008;6:53–60.

Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012;48:36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. DOI

Peters G.-J.Y. Userfriendlyscience. 2018. [(accessed on 1 September 2021)]. Available online: https://rdrr.io/cran/userfriendlyscience/man/userfriendlyscience-package.html.

Lionetti F. Chapter 2—Assessment of sensory processing sensitivity across the lifespan. In: Acevedo B.P., editor. The Highly Sensitive Brain. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2020. pp. 17–49. DOI

Liss M., Mailloux J., Erchull M.J. The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2008;45:255–259. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.009. DOI

Chater N. Facing up to the uncertainties of COVID-19. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020;4:439. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0865-2. PubMed DOI

Zidkova R., Malinakova K., van Dijk J.P., Tavel P. The Coronavirus Pandemic and the Occurrence of Psychosomatic Symptoms: Are They Related? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073570. PubMed DOI PMC

Highly sensitive persons feel more emotionally lonely than the general population