The current digital content industry is heavily oriented towards building platforms that track users' behaviour and seek to convince them to stay longer and come back sooner onto the platform. Similarly, authors are incentivised to publish more and to become champions of dissemination. Arguably, these incentive systems are built around public reputation supported by a system of metrics, hard to be assessed. Generally, the digital content industry is permeable to non-human contributors (algorithms that are able to generate content and reactions), anonymity and identity fraud. It is pertinent to present a perspective paper about early signs of track and persuasion in scholarly communication. Building our views, we have run a pilot study to determine the opportunity for conducting research about the use of "track and persuade" technologies in scholarly communication. We collected observations on a sample of 148 relevant websites and we interviewed 15 that are experts related to the field. Through this work, we tried to identify 1) the essential questions that could inspire proper research, 2) good practices to be recommended for future research, and 3) whether citizen science is a suitable approach to further research in this field. The findings could contribute to determining a broader solution for building trust and infrastructure in scholarly communication. The principles of Open Science will be used as a framework to see if they offer insights into this work going forward.

Cambridge University Library University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom

CIIRC Department Czech Technical University Prague Prague Czechia

LCCOS Library Culture Collections Open Science University College London London United Kingdom

Scientific Knowledge Services Munich Germany

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abdullah H. (2020). “Proposition of a Framework for Consumer Information Privacy Protection,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD). 10.1109/icabcd49160.2020.9183822 DOI

ALLEA (2017a). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin: ALLEA. Revised edition https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf .

ALLEA (2017b). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin: ALLEA. Available at: https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/ (Accessed July 20, 2021).

Aries Systems (2020). Privacy Policy. Available at: https://www.ariessys.com/about/privacy-policy/ (Accessed July 12, 2021).

Ayris P., San Román A. L., Maes K., Labastida I. (2018a). Open Science and its Role in Universities: A Roadmap for Cultural Change. Leuven: LERU. Available at: https://www.leru.org/publications/open-science-and-its-role-in-universities-a-roadmap-for-cultural-change .

Ayris P., San Román A. L., Maes K., Labastida I. (2018b). Open Science and its Role in Universities: A Roadmap for Cultural Change. Leuven: LERU. Full Paper. Leru:Org: https://www.leru.org/files/LERU-AP24-Open-Science-full-paper.pdf .

Balaouras S. (2019). Protect Your Intellectual Property and Customer Data from Theft and Abuse. Cambridge: USA.

Barbu O. (2014). Advertising, Microtargeting and Social Media. Proced. - Soc. Behav. Sci. 163, 44–49. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.284 DOI

BBC News (2021). Google Boss Sundar Pichai Warns of Threats to Free and Open Internet - BBC News. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHMViKOOfg8 (Accessed July 20, 2021).

Beckers M. (2021). Modern Recommender Systems. Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/modern-recommender-systems-a0c727609aa8 (Accessed July 12, 2021).

Bielova N. (2017). “Web Tracking Technologies and Protection Mechanisms” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 10.1145/3133956.3136067 DOI

Bujlow T., Carela-Espanol V., Lee B.-R., Barlet-Ros P. (2017). A Survey on Web Tracking: Mechanisms, Implications, and Defenses. Proc. IEEE 105, 1476–1510. 10.1109/jproc.2016.2637878 DOI

Carey B. (2020). Need a Hypothesis? This A.I. Has One. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/24/science/artificial-intelligence-ai-psychology.html (Accessed July 15, 2021).

CSI-COP (2021). Citizen Scientists Investigating Cookies and App GDPR Compliance - about Us. Available at: https://csi-cop.eu/ (Accessed July 23, 2021).

Gibney E. (2018). The Scant Science behind Cambridge Analytica's Controversial Marketing Techniques. Nature. 10.1038/d41586-018-03880-4 DOI

Hamed A., Ayed H. K.-B. (2015). “Privacy Scoring and Users' Awareness for Web Tracking,” in 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). 10.1109/iacs.2015.7103210 DOI

Lawrence R., Mendez E. (2020). Progress on Open Science : Towards A Shared Research Knowledge System : Final Report of the Open Science Policy Platform. Brussels: Op.Europa.Eu. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d36f8071-99bd-11ea-aac4-01aa75ed71a1 .

Michael A. (2019). Ask the Chefs: AI and Scholarly Communications. Available at: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/04/25/ask-chefs-ai-scholarly-communications/ (Accessed July 12, 2021).

Mittal S. (2010). User Privacy and the Evolution of Third-Party Tracking Mechanisms on the World Wide Web. SSRN J. 10.2139/ssrn.2005252 DOI

Open Science EU (2020). Open Science Policy Platform: Final Report. Available at: https://openscience.eu/open-science-policy-platform-final-report/ (Accessed October 10, 2021).

Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 175–179. 10.1257/000282803321947001 DOI

The Royal Society and The Alan Turing Institute (2019). The AI Revolution in Scientific Research. London: The Royal Society. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/ai-and-society/AI-revolution-in-science.pdf .