Causes of admission and outcomes of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) leverets at wildlife rescue centres in the Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35033062
PubMed Central
PMC8760806
DOI
10.1186/s12917-021-03136-w
PII: 10.1186/s12917-021-03136-w
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Mammal, Mortality, Orphan, Rehabilitation, Release,
- MeSH
- divoká zvířata MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů MeSH
- záchranná práce MeSH
- zajíci * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Wildlife rescue centres care for orphaned and injured young as an integral part of their work. However, inappropriate interventions in nature can have a negative effect on the survival of young hares, especially when the care of these young is not very successful. The aim of this study was to assess the number of brown hare leverets admitted to rescue centres in the Czech Republic in the period from 2010 to 2019, the causes of their admission to rescue centres and their outcomes. RESULTS: We evaluated the number of brown hare leverets admitted to rescue centres in the Czech Republic in the period from 2010 to 2019 and the outcomes associated with their leaving these rescue centres. We found that the number of brown hare leverets admitted increased during the monitored period (rSp = 0.6364, p < 0.05). The most frequent reasons for admission were the admission of orphaned young (49.15%), leverets brought needlessly (19.60%) and leverets that had been bitten by other animals (18.63%). More (p < 0.05) young admitted to rescue centres died (40.76%) than were reared successfully and released back into the wild (32.40%). Leverets that had been caught needlessly or orphaned and late-born leverets survived and could be released back into the wild (38.56, 34.51 and 52%, respectively), while fatalities were recorded in most leverets bitten by another animal (65.05%) or hit in a collision with a vehicle (97.06%). Most young hares (76.92%) that were exhausted or starved at the time of admission could not be saved. CONCLUSIONS: Since only a small proportion of hares in a litter survive until adulthood in the wild, young animals being found and taken needlessly to rescue centres may harm the hare population. Our results show that only around one in three healthy young hares admitted to rescue centres are reared successfully. It is, in our opinion, of fundamental importance to the protection of brown hare leverets to inform the public of this issue and prevent needless interventions into natural rearing in the wild.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
IUCN Red List. Lepus europaeus [online]. [vid. 1. 3. 2021]. 2020. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?query=zaj%C3%ADc%20poln%C3%AD&searchType=species
Keken Z, Kušta T, Langer P, Skaloš J. Landscape structural changes between 1950 and 2012 and their role in wildlife–vehicle collisions in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy. 2016;59:543–556. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.002. DOI
Sliwinski K, Ronnenberg K, Jung K, Strauß E, Siebert U. Habitat requirements of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas 1778) in an intensively used agriculture region (Lower Saxony, Germany) BMC Ecol. 2019;19:31. doi: 10.1186/s12898-019-0247-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Edwards PJ, et al. Review of the factors affecting the decline of the European brown hare, Lepus europaeus (Pallas, 1778) and the use of wildlife incident data to evaluate the significance of paraquat. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;79:95–103. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00153-X. DOI
Pépin D, Angibault JM. Selection of resting sites by the European hare as related to habitat characteristics during agricultural changes. Eur J Wildl Res. 2007;53:183–189. doi: 10.1007/s10344-007-0087-1. DOI
Chroust K, Vodnansky M, Pikula J. Parasite load of European brown hares in Austria and the Czech Republic. Vet Med. 2012;57:551–558. doi: 10.17221/6367-VETMED. DOI
Angelici FM, Riga F, Boitani L, Luiselli L. Fate of captive-reared brown hares Lepus europaeus released at a mountain site in Central Italy. Wildl Biol. 2000;6:173–178. doi: 10.2981/wlb.2000.013. DOI
Hutchings MR, Harris S. Does hunting pressure affect the flushing behaviour of brown hares (Lepus europaeus)? J Zool. 1995;237:663–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb05023.x. DOI
Voigt U, Siebert U. Survival rates on pre-weaning European hares (Lepus europaeus) in an intensively used agricultural area. Eur J Wildl Res. 2020;66:67. doi: 10.1007/s10344-020-01403-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Hansen K. Reproduction in European hare in a Danish farmland. Acta Theriol. 1992;37:27–40. doi: 10.4098/AT.arch.92-3. DOI
Karp D, Gehr B. Bad hare day: very low survival rate in brown hare leverets. Wildl Biol. 2002;2:wlb.00645.
Baudains TP, Lloys P. Habituation and habitat changes can moderate the impacts of human disturbance on shorebird breeding performance. Anim Conserv. 2007;10:400–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00126.x. DOI
Misiorowska M, Wasilewski M. Spatial organisation and mortality of released hares -preliminary results. Ann Zool Fenn. 2008;45:286–290. doi: 10.5735/086.045.0408. DOI
Marboutin E, et al. Population dynamics in European hare: breeding parameters and sustainable harvest rates. J Appl Ecol. 2003;40:580–591. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00813.x. DOI
Butterworth A, Turner KME, Jennings N. Minimising orphaning in the brown hare Lepus europaeus in England and Wales: should a close season be introduced. Wildl biol. 2017;1:2017.
Stocker L. Practical wildlife care. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Pub; 2005. p. 335.
Paci G, Ferretti M, Bagliacca M. Reducing visual stimulations in European hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas) captured for translocation. Ital J Anim Sci. 2012;11:e51. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2012.e51. DOI
Hackländer K, Arnold W, Ruf T. Postnatal development and thermoregulation in the precocial European hare (Lepus europaeus) J Comp Physiol B. 2002;172:183–190. doi: 10.1007/s00360-001-0243-y. PubMed DOI
Broekhuizen S, Maaskamp F. Behaviour of does and leverets of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) whilst nursing. J Zool Lond. 1980;191:487–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb01480.x. DOI
Valencak TG, et al. Peak energy turnover in lactating European hares: the role of fat reserves. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:231–237. doi: 10.1242/jeb.022640. PubMed DOI PMC
Stott P. Comparisons of digestive function between the European hare (Lepus europaeus) and the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): mastication, gut passage, and digestibility. Mamm Biol. 2008;73:276–286. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2007.07.002. DOI
Popescu FD, et al. Effects of season and reproductive state on lipid intake and fatty acid composition of gastrointestinal tract contents in the European hare. J Comp Physiol B. 2011;181:681–689. doi: 10.1007/s00360-011-0559-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Lukešová G, Voslarova E, Vecerek V, Vucinic M. Trends in intake and outcomes for European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) in the Czech rescue centers. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0248422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248422. PubMed DOI PMC
Molina-López RA, Mañosa S, Torres-Riera A, Pomarol M, Darwich L. Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain) PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181331. PubMed DOI PMC
Paci G, et al. Stress evaluation in hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas) captured for traslocation. Ital J Anim Sci. 2006;5:175–181. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2006.175. DOI
Woods M, Mcdonald RA, Harris S. Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain: predation of wildlife by domestic cats. Mammal Rev. 2003;33:174–188. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00017.x. DOI
Reynolds JC, Tapper SC. Predation by foxes Vulpes vulpes on brown hares Lepus europaeus in central southern England, and its potential impact on annual population growth. Wildl Biol. 1995;1:145–158. doi: 10.2981/wlb.1995.019. DOI
Crespo Martínez J, Izquierdo Rosique A, Surroca RM. Causes of admission and final dispositions of hedgehogs admitted to three wildlife rehabilitation centers in eastern Spain. Hystrix. 2014;25:107–110.