Perceived Changes in Sexual Interest and Distress About Discrepant Sexual Interest During the First Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Country Assessment in Cohabiting Partnered Individuals
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
35039982
PubMed Central
PMC8763301
DOI
10.1007/s10508-021-02279-z
PII: 10.1007/s10508-021-02279-z
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Approach/avoidance sexual motivation, COVID-19, Complex emergency, Sexual distress, Sexual interest discrepancy,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Communicable Disease Control MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pandemics * MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Due to COVID-19 pandemic, different restrictive measures in terms of physical distancing and lockdowns have been introduced in most European countries, affecting all facets of social life. Currently, little is known about how partnered individuals perceive changes in their sexual life during this complex emergency. This study explored retrospectively assessed changes in sexual interest for one's partner and levels of distress related to perceived sexual interest discrepancy during the first phase of the pandemic in a large-scale online sample of partnered individuals (n = 4813; Mage = 38.5 years, SD = 10.74) recruited between May and July 2020 in seven European Union countries and Turkey. We also examined the possible role of approach/avoidance motives for sex in reported changes in sexual interest and associated distress. Most participants (53%) reported no change in their sexual interest during the pandemic, followed by those who reported an increase (28.5%). The pattern was similar across the eight countries. Distress about discrepant sexual interest, which was only weakly related to changes in sexual interest, was significantly associated with relationship quality and emotional closeness with a partner, coping with and worrying about the pandemic, and specific motivation for sex. In contrast to avoidant and relationship-focused approach motivation, ego-focused approach motivation was related to stable sexual interest during the pandemic. The current study contributes to the understanding of the link between sexual interest and complex emergencies. Considering that the COVID-19 pandemic continues, the reported experiences and perceptions are prone to change.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Marseilles France
Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies Department of Social Work Malmö University Malmö Sweden
CEReSS Health Services and Quality of Life Research Aix Marseille University Marseilles France
Department of Psychology Medical School Hamburg Hamburg Germany
Department of Social Work Malmö University Malmö Sweden
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Porto Porto Portugal
ISPA University Institute of Psychology and Social Sciences Lisbon Portugal
National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Albala-Bertrand JM. Responses to complex humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters: An analytical comparison. Third World Quarterly. 2000;21(2):215–227. doi: 10.1080/01436590050004328. DOI
Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;63(4):596–612. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596. DOI
Aversa A, Jannini EA. COVID-19, or the triumph of monogamy? Minerva Endocrinologica. 2020;45:77–78. doi: 10.23736/S0391-1977.20.03207-1. PubMed DOI
Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Long JS. The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2003;32(3):217–230. doi: 10.1023/A:1023409516739. PubMed DOI
Baraldi AN, Enders CK. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology. 2010;48(1):5–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001. PubMed DOI
Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, Heymann DL, Ihekweazu C, Kobinger G, Lane HC, Memish Z, Oh M-D, Sall AA, Schuchat A, Ungchusak K, Wieler LH. COVID-19: Towards controlling of a pandemic. The Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1015–1018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Bendau A, Petzold MB, Pyrkosch L, MascarellMaricic L, Betzler F, Rogoll J, Große J, Ströhle A, Plag J. Associations between COVID-19 related media consumption and symptoms of anxiety, depression and COVID-19 related fear in the general population in Germany. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2020;1:3. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01171-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Brauner, J. M., Mindermann, S., Sharma, M., Johnston, D., Salvatier, J., Gavenčiak, T., Stephenson, A. B., Leech, G., Altman, G., Mikulik, V., Norman, A. J., Monrad, J. T., Besiroglu, T., Ge, H., Hartwick, M. A., Teh, Y. W., Chindelevitch, L., Gal, Y., & Kulveit, J. (2021). Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19. Science,371. 10.1126/science.abd9338 PubMed PMC
Brezsnyak M, Whisman MA. Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2004;30(3):199–217. doi: 10.1080/00926230490262393. PubMed DOI
Brotto LA, Jabs F, Brown N, Milani S, Zdaniuk B. Impact of COVID-19 related stress on sexual desire and behavior in a Canadian sample. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2021 doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1947932. PubMed DOI PMC
Buss DM. The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books; 1994.
Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1999;8(5):133–137. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00031. DOI
Carvalheira A, Traeen B, Štulhofer A. Correlates of men’s sexual interest: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(1):154–164. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12345. PubMed DOI
Carvalho J, Campos P, Carrito M, Moura C, Quinta-Gomes A, Tavares I, Nobre P. The relationship between COVID-19 confinement, psychological adjustment, and sexual functioning, in a sample of Portuguese men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2021;18(7):1191–1197. doi: 10.1016/J.JSXM.2021.04.007. PubMed DOI PMC
Dewitte M, Carvalho J, Corona G, Limoncin E, Pascoal P, Reisman Y, Štulhofer A. Sexual desire discrepancy: A position statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Sexual Medicine. 2020;8:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.02.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Döring N. How is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting our sexualities? An overview of the current media narratives and research hypotheses [Commentary] Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020;49:2765–2778. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01790-z. PubMed DOI PMC
ECDC. (2020). Resurgence of reported cases of COVID 19 in the EU/EEA, the UK and EU candidate and potential candidate countries: 2 July 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/rapid-risk-assessment-resurgence-reported-cases-covid-19. PubMed
Elliot AJ, Gable SL, Mapes RR. Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006;32(2):378–391. doi: 10.1177/0146167205282153. PubMed DOI
Fernandes N. Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3557504. DOI
Ferreira LC, Narciso I, Novo RF, Pereira CR. Predicting couple satisfaction: The role of differentiation of self, sexual desire and intimacy in heterosexual individuals. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2014;29(4):390–404. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2014.957498. DOI
Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007;21(4):572–583. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572. PubMed DOI
Gable SL. Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality. 2006;74(1):175–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x. PubMed DOI
Gable SL, Impett EA. Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012;6(1):95–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00405.x. DOI
Gable SL, Poore J. Which thoughts count? Algorithms for evaluating satisfaction in relationships. Psychological Science. 2008;19(10):1030–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02195.x. PubMed DOI
Gewirtz-Meydan A, Ayalon L. Why do older adults have sex? Approach and avoidance sexual motives among older women and men. Journal of Sex Research. 2019;56(7):870–881. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1543644. PubMed DOI
Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data: Analysis and design. Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-4018-5.
Hale T, Anania J, Angrist N, Boby T, Cameron-Blake E, Ellen L, Goldszmidt R, Hallas L, Kira B, Luciano M, Majumdar S, Nagesh R, Petherick A, Phillips T, Tatlow H, Webster S, Wood A, Zhang Y. Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;5:529–538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. PubMed DOI
Herbenick D, Mullinax M, Mark K. Sexual desire discrepancy as a feature, not a bug, of long-term relationships: Women’s self-reported strategies for modulating sexual desire. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(9):2196–2206. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12625. PubMed DOI
Hinchliff S, Gott M. Intimacy, commitment, and adaptation: Sexual relationships within long-term marriages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2004;21(5):595–609. doi: 10.1177/0265407504045889. DOI
Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, Ballard C, Christensen H, Cohen Silver R, Everall I, Ford T, John A, Kabir T, King K, Madan I, Michie S, Przybylski AK, Shafran R, Sweeney A, Bullmore E. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(6):547–560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Hunt K, Adamson J, Galdas P. Gender and help-seeking: Towards gender-comparative studies. In: Kuhlmann E, Annandale E, editors. The Palgrave handbook of gender and healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. pp. 207–211.
Ibarra FP, Mehrad M, Di Mauro M, Godoy MFP, Cruz EG, Nilforoushzadeh MA, Russo GI. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sexual behavior of the population. The vision of the East and the West. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2020;46(Suppl 1):104–112. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S116. PubMed DOI PMC
Impett EA, Gable SL, Peplau LA. Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89(3):327–344. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327. PubMed DOI
Impett EA, Peplau LA, Gable SL. Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships. 2005;12(4):465–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00126.x. DOI
Impett EA, Strachman A, Finkel EJ, Gable SL. Maintaining sexual desire in intimate relationships: The importance of approach goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;94(5):808–823. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.808. PubMed DOI
Jacob L, Smith L, Butler L, Barnett Y, Grabovac I, McDermott D, Armstrong N, Yakkundi A, Tully MA. COVID-19 social distancing and sexual activity in a sample of the British public. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020;17:1229–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Janssen E, Macapagal KR, Mustanski B. Individual differences in the effects of mood on sexuality: The revised Mood and Sexuality Questionnaire (MSQ-R) Journal of Sex Research. 2013;50(7):676–687. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.684251. PubMed DOI PMC
Kavanagh MM, Singh R. Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID 19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2020;45:997–1012. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641530. PubMed DOI
Khaw AJ, Burkholder B, Salama P, Dondero TJ. HIV risk and prevention in emergency-affected populations: A review. Disasters. 2000;24(3):181–197. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00141. PubMed DOI
Kim JJ, Muise A, Barranti M, Mark KP, Rosen NO, Harasymchuk C, Impett E. Are couples more satisfied when they match in sexual desire? New insights from response surface analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020;12(4):487–496. doi: 10.1177/1948550620926770. DOI
Kirana PS, Gudeloglu A, Sansone A, Fode M, Reisman Y, Corona G, Burri A. E-sexual health: A position statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020;17(7):1246–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.03.009. PubMed DOI
Lane S, MacDonald NE, Marti M, Dumolard L. Vaccine hesitancy around the globe: Analysis of three years of WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form data-2015–2017. Vaccine. 2018;36(26):3861–3867. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.063. PubMed DOI PMC
Lehmiller JJ, Garcia JR, Gesselman AN, Mark KP. Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences. 2021;43:295–304. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016. DOI
Li, G., Tang, D., Bin, S., Wang, C., Shen, Q., Xu, C., Geng, H., Wu, H., He, X., & Cao, Y. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on partner relationships, sexual and reproductive health: A cross-sectional online survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research,22. 10.2196/20961 PubMed PMC
Li W, Li G, Xin C, Wang Y, Yang S. Changes in sexual behaviors of young women and men during the Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: A convenience sample from the epidemic area. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020;17:1225–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.04.380. PubMed DOI
Lopes GP, Vale FBC, Vieira I, da Silva Filho AL, Abuhid C, Geber S. COVID-19 and sexuality: Reinventing intimacy [Letter to the Editor] Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020;49:2735–2738. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01796-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Luijkx R, Halman L, Sieben I, Brislinger E, Quandt M. European values in numbers. Brill. 2016 doi: 10.1163/9789004328525. DOI
Lykins AD, Janssen E, Graham CA. The relationship between negative mood and sexuality in heterosexual college women and men. Journal of Sex Research. 2006;43(2):136–143. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552308. PubMed DOI
Mark KP, Lasslo JA. Maintaining sexual desire in long-term relationships: A systematic review and conceptual model. Journal of Sex Research. 2018;55(4–5):563–581. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1437592. PubMed DOI
Mark KP, Herbenick D, Fortenberry D, Sanders S, Reece M. The object of sexual desire: Examining the “What” in “What do you desire?”. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(11):2709–2719. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12683. PubMed DOI
Mazza M, Marano G, Lai C, Janiri L, Sani G. Danger in danger: Interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry Research. 2020;289:113046. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046. PubMed DOI PMC
Miranda EP, Nascimento B, Torres LO, Glina S, Carvalho J, Pascoal PM. Challenges in the practice of sexual medicine in the time of COVID-19 in Portugal. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020;17(7):1212–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.013. PubMed DOI PMC
Morris NP. Staying apart during a pandemic. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020;180:1047–1048. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2505. PubMed DOI
Muise A, Boudreau GK, Rosen NO. Seeking connection versus avoiding disappointment: An experimental manipulation of approach and avoidance sexual goals and the implications for desire and satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research. 2017;54(3):296–307. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1152455. PubMed DOI
Muise A, Impett EA, Desmarais S. Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2013;39(10):1320–1332. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490963. PubMed DOI
Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Rossi R, Navarro-Cremades F, Simonelli C. Male sexual desire: An overview of biological, psychological, sexual, relational, and cultural factors influencing desire. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2020;8(1):59–91. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.002. PubMed DOI
Pereira TJ, Machado PPP, Peixoto MM. Sexual and relationship satisfaction: The role of perceived (non)problematic sexual desire discrepancy in gay and heterosexual men. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2019;45(2):103–113. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1488323. PubMed DOI
Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383:510–512. doi: 10.1056/nejmp2008017. PubMed DOI
Prime H, Wade M, Browne DT. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist. 2020;75(5):631–643. doi: 10.1037/amp0000660. PubMed DOI
Roesch, E., Amin, A., Gupta, J., & García-Moreno, C. (2020). Violence against women during covid-19 pandemic restrictions. British Medical Journal,369. 10.1136/bmj.m1712 PubMed PMC
Rosen NO, Bailey K, Muise A. Degree and direction of sexual desire discrepancy are linked to sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples transitioning to parenthood. Journal of Sex Research. 2018;55(2):214–225. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1321732. PubMed DOI
Ross MW, Månsson SA, Daneback K, Cooper A, Tikkanen R. Biases in internet sexual health samples: Comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden. Social Science and Medicine. 2005;61(1):245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.019. PubMed DOI
Sanchez DT, Moss-Racusin CA, Phelan JE, Crocker J. Relationship contingency and sexual motivation in women: Implications for sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2011;40(1):99–110. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9593-4. PubMed DOI
Schiavi MC, Spina V, Zullo MA, Colagiovanni V, Luffarelli P, Rago R, Palazzetti P. Love in the time of COVID-19: Sexual function and quality of life analysis during the social distancing measures in a group of Italian reproductive-age women. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020;17:1407–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.006. PubMed DOI PMC
Schoenfeld EA, Loving TJ, Pope MT, Huston TL, Štulhofer A. Does sex really matter? Examining the connections between spouses’ nonsexual behaviors, sexual frequency, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2017;46(2):489–501. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0672-4. PubMed DOI
Sprecher S, Cate RM. Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In: Harvey JH, Wenzel A, Sprecher S, editors. The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. Erlbaum; 2004. pp. 235–256.
Štulhofer A, Ferreira LC, Landripet I. Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2013;29(2):229–244. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2013.870335. DOI
Štulhofer A, Jurin T, Graham C, Janssen E, Træen B. Emotional intimacy and sexual well-being in aging European couples: A cross-cultural mediation analysis. European Journal of Ageing. 2020;17(1):43–54. doi: 10.1007/s10433-019-00509-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Træen B, Hald GM, Graham CA, Enzlin P, Janssen E, Kvalem IL, Carvalheira A, Štulhofer A. Sexuality in older adults (65+)—An overview of the literature, part 1: Sexual function and its difficulties. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2017;29(1):1–10. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2016.1224286. DOI
Turban JL, Keuroghlian AS, Mayer KH. Sexual health in the SARS-CoV-2 era. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2020 doi: 10.7326/M20-2004. PubMed DOI PMC
Usher K, Bhullar N, Durkin J, Gyamfi N, Jackson D. Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2020;29(4):549–552. doi: 10.1111/inm.12735. PubMed DOI PMC
Wisner B, Adams J, editors. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: A practical guide. World Health Organization; 2002.
Yuksel B, Ozgor F. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual behavior. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020;150(1):98–102. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13193. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang WR, Wang K, Yin L, Zhao WF, Xue Q, Peng M, Min BQ, Tian Q, Leng HX, Du JL, Chang H, Yang Y, Li W, Shangguan FF, Yan TY, Dong HQ, Han Y, Wang YP, Cosci F, Wang HX. Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2020;89(4):242–250. doi: 10.1159/000507639. PubMed DOI PMC