Examining potential confounding factors in gene expression analysis of human saliva and identifying potential housekeeping genes
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
U19 AI067773
NIAID NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
35145126
PubMed Central
PMC8831573
DOI
10.1038/s41598-022-05670-5
PII: 10.1038/s41598-022-05670-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- RNA, Bacterial MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Genes, Essential * MeSH
- Gene Expression * MeSH
- DNA, Complementary MeSH
- DNA Contamination MeSH
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- RNA isolation & purification MeSH
- Saliva metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Profiling methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- RNA, Bacterial MeSH
- DNA, Complementary MeSH
- RNA MeSH
Isolation of RNA from whole saliva, a non-invasive and easily accessible biofluid that is an attractive alternative to blood for high-throughput biodosimetry of radiological/nuclear victims might be of clinical significance for prediction and diagnosis of disease. In a previous analysis of 12 human samples we identified two challenges to measuring gene expression from total RNA: (1) the fraction of human RNA in whole saliva was low and (2) the bacterial contamination was overwhelming. To overcome these challenges, we performed selective cDNA synthesis for human RNA species only by employing poly(A)+-tail primers followed by qRT-PCR. In the current study, this approach was independently validated on 91 samples from 61 healthy donors. Additionally, we used the ratio of human to bacterial RNA to adjust the input RNA to include equal amounts of human RNA across all samples before cDNA synthesis, which then ensured comparable analysis using the same base human input material. Furthermore, we examined relative levels of ten known housekeeping genes, and assessed inter- and intra-individual differences in 61 salivary RNA isolates, while considering effects of demographical factors (e.g. sex, age), epidemiological factors comprising social habits (e.g. alcohol, cigarette consumption), oral hygiene (e.g. flossing, mouthwash), previous radiological diagnostic procedures (e.g. number of CT-scans) and saliva collection time (circadian periodic). Total human RNA amounts appeared significantly associated with age only (P ≤ 0.02). None of the chosen housekeeping genes showed significant circadian periodicity and either did not associate or were weakly associated with the 24 confounders examined, with one exception, 60% of genes were altered by mouthwash. ATP6, ACTB and B2M represented genes with the highest mean baseline expression (Ct-values ≤ 30) and were detected in all samples. Combining these housekeeping genes for normalization purposes did not decrease inter-individual variance, but increased the robustness. In summary, our work addresses critical confounders and provides important information for the successful examination of gene expression in human whole saliva.
Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Center for Radiological Research Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY 10032 USA
Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern University Chicago IL 60611 USA
Department of Radiology University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Institute for Hematology and Blood Transfusion Hospital Na Bulovce Prague Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Quinn JF, et al. Extracellular RNAs: Development as biomarkers of human disease. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2015;4:27495. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.27495. PubMed DOI PMC
Li MH, Fu SB, Xiao HS. Genome-wide analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression signatures in cancer. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015;36:1200–1211. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.67. PubMed DOI PMC
Condrat CE, et al. miRNAs as biomarkers in disease: Latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells. 2020;9:276. doi: 10.3390/cells9020276. PubMed DOI PMC
Szabo, D. T. Transcriptomic biomarkers in safety and risk assessment of chemicals. In Biomarkers in Toxicology (Ed. Gupta, R. C.) 1033–1038. 10.1016/B978-0-12-404630-6.00062-2 (Elsevier Inc, 2014).
Maron JL, et al. Neonatal salivary analysis reveals global developmental gene expression changes in the premature infant. Clin. Chem. 2010;56:409–416. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.136234. PubMed DOI PMC
Watanabe K, Akutsu T, Takamura A, Sakurada K. Practical evaluation of an RNA-based saliva identification method. Sci. Justice. 2017;57:404–408. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.07.001. PubMed DOI
Lacombe J, et al. Analysis of saliva gene expression during head and neck cancer radiotherapy: A pilot study. Radiat. Res. 2017;188:75–81. doi: 10.1667/RR14707.1. PubMed DOI PMC
Ghizoni JS, Nichele R, de Oliveira MT, Pamato S, Pereira JR. The utilization of saliva as an early diagnostic tool for oral cancer: microRNA as a biomarker. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2020;22:804–812. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02210-y. PubMed DOI
Li Y, et al. Salivary transcriptome diagnostics for oral cancer detection. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:8442–8450. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1167. PubMed DOI
Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, et al. Saliva diagnostics—Current views and directions. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017;242:459–472. doi: 10.1177/1535370216681550. PubMed DOI PMC
Chen W, Cao H, Lin J, Olsen N, Zheng SG. Biomarkers for primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Genomics Proteomics Bioinform. 2015;13:219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.06.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Michael A, et al. Exosomes from human saliva as a source of microRNA biomarkers. Oral Dis. 2010;16:34–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01604.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Yoshizawa JM, et al. Salivary biomarkers: Toward future clinical and diagnostic utilities. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26:781–791. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00021-13. PubMed DOI PMC
Segal A, Wong DT. Salivary diagnostics: Enhancing disease detection and making medicine better. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2008;12:22–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00477.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Ostheim P, et al. Overcoming challenges in human saliva gene expression measurements. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:11147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67825-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Only, U. Oragene ® • RNA purification protocol using the Qiagen RNeasy Micro Kit for volumes up to 1000 µL. 3–5 (2012).
Life Technologies. mirVanaTM miRNA Isolation Kit. 33 (2011).
Applied Biosystems. High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits for 200 and 1000 Reactions Protocol (Rev E). Manual 1–29 (2010).
RevTsc, T. SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (200U/µL) #18080-085. Manual 1–4 (2004).
Fisher, T. & July, S. TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix User Guide (2018).
Aro K, Wei F, Wong DT, Tu M. Saliva liquid biopsy for point-of-care applications. Front. Public Health. 2017;5:77. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00077. PubMed DOI PMC
Pernot E, Cardis E, Badie C. Usefulness of saliva samples for biomarker studies in radiation research. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014;23:2673–2680. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0588. PubMed DOI
Dheda K, et al. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques. 2004;37:112–119. doi: 10.2144/04371RR03. PubMed DOI
Palanisamy V, Wong DT. Transcriptomic analyses of saliva. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;666:43–51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-820-1_4. PubMed DOI PMC
Navazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1993;694:72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18343.x. PubMed DOI
Patel RS, et al. High resolution of microRNA signatures in human whole saliva. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011;56:1506–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.05.015. PubMed DOI PMC
Park NJ, et al. Salivary microRNA: Discovery, characterization, and clinical utility for oral cancer detection. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:5473–5477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0736. PubMed DOI PMC
Majem B, Li F, Sun J, Wong DTW. RNA sequencing analysis of salivary extracellular RNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1537:17–36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6685-1_2. PubMed DOI PMC
Tricarico C, et al. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: Normalization to rRNA or single housekeeping genes is inappropriate for human tissue biopsies. Anal. Biochem. 2002;309:293–300. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00311-1. PubMed DOI
Vandesompele J, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:1–12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. PubMed DOI PMC
Schmid H, et al. Validation of endogenous controls for gene expression analysis in microdissected human renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 2003;64:356–360. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00074.x. PubMed DOI