Worldwide diversity of endophytic fungi and insects associated with dormant tree twigs
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Dataset, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
35232978
PubMed Central
PMC8888713
DOI
10.1038/s41597-022-01162-3
PII: 10.1038/s41597-022-01162-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biodiversity MeSH
- Endophytes * MeSH
- Insecta * MeSH
- Fungi * MeSH
- Trees MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Dataset MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
International trade in plants and climate change are two of the main factors causing damaging tree pests (i.e. fungi and insects) to spread into new areas. To mitigate these risks, a large-scale assessment of tree-associated fungi and insects is needed. We present records of endophytic fungi and insects in twigs of 17 angiosperm and gymnosperm genera, from 51 locations in 32 countries worldwide. Endophytic fungi were characterized by high-throughput sequencing of 352 samples from 145 tree species in 28 countries. Insects were reared from 227 samples of 109 tree species in 18 countries and sorted into taxonomic orders and feeding guilds. Herbivorous insects were grouped into morphospecies and were identified using molecular and morphological approaches. This dataset reveals the diversity of tree-associated taxa, as it contains 12,721 fungal Amplicon Sequence Variants and 208 herbivorous insect morphospecies, sampled across broad geographic and climatic gradients and for many tree species. This dataset will facilitate applied and fundamental studies on the distribution of fungal endophytes and insects in trees.
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK
Agriculture Victoria Research Agribio Centre Bundoora Victoria Australia
Biotechnical Faculty University of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro
Central Siberian Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch Novosibirsk Russia
College of Forestry and Biotechnology Zhejiang A and F University Hangzhou China
Croatian Forest Research Institute Jastrebarsko Croatia
D B Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine Dublin Republic of Ireland
Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Forest Ecosystems Protection University of Agriculture in Krakow Krakow Poland
Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA
Department of Vegetal Production and Forest Resources University of Valladolid Palencia Spain
DIBAF University of Tuscia Viterbo Italy
Faculty of Forestry Çankırı Karatekin University Cankiri Turkey
Fera Science Ltd National Agri food Innovation Campus York UK
Forest Research Institute Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter Thessaloniki Greece
Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
Forestry and Wood Technology Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden
GREEN IT Bioresources for Sustainability ITQB NOVA Oeiras Portugal
Harry Butler Institute Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection National Research Council C N R Sesto Fiorentino Italy
Institute of Agricultural Sciences ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland
Institute of Botany at the Nature Research Centre Vilnius Lithuania
Institute of Forest Ecology Slovak Academy of Sciences Nitra Slovakia
Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering Estonian University of Life Sciences Tartu Estonia
Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia
Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland
Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche Bariloche Argentina
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária 1 P Oeiras Portugal
Isparta University of Applied Sciences Isparta Turkey
Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium
National Forest Centre Forest Research Institute Zvolen Slovakia
National Research Institute of Rural Engineering Water and Forests Ariana Tunisia
Natural Resources Institute Finland Suonenjoki Finland
NIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research Ås Norway
NMBU Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway
Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia
School of Applied Systems Biology La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia
Siberian Federal University Krasnoyarsk Russia
Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening Pruhonice Czech Republic
Slovenian Forestry Institute Ljubljana Slovenia
South African National Biodiversity Institute Kirstenbosch Research Centre Cape Town South Africa
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden
Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute University of Valladolid INIA Palencia Spain
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland
Tanzania Forestry Research Institute Lushoto Tanzania
Ukrainian National Forestry University Lviv Ukraine
Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration Kharkiv Ukraine
Ukrainian Research Institute of Mountain Forestry Ivano Frankivsk Ukraine
University of Sopron Forest Research Institute Department of Forest Protection Mátrafüred Hungary
USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens Georgia USA
See more in PubMed
Rodriguez RJ, White JFJ, Arnold AE, Redman RS. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009;182:314–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x. PubMed DOI
Dajoz, R. Insects and forests: the role and diversity of insects in the forest environment. (Intercept, 2000).
Stone, J. K., Polishook, J. D. & White, J. F. J. Endophytic fungi. in Biodiversity of fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods (eds. Mueller, G., Bills, G. & Foster, M.) 241–270, 10.1016/B978-0-12-509551-8.50015-5 (Elsevier Inc., 2004).
Santini A, et al. Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytol. 2013;197:238–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04364.x. PubMed DOI
Eschen R, Roques A, Santini A. Taxonomic dissimilarity in patterns of interception and establishment of alien arthropods, nematodes and pathogens affecting woody plants in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 2015;21:36–45. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12267. DOI
Boyd IL, Freer-Smith PH, Gilligan CA, Godfray HCJ. The consequence of tree pests and diseases for ecosystem services. Science. 2013;342:1235773. doi: 10.1126/science.1235773. PubMed DOI
Desprez-Loustau, M.-L. Alien Fungi of Europe. in DAISIE Handbook of Alien Species in Europe (ed. Drake, J. A.) 15–29 (Springer International Publishing, 2009).
Novotny V, et al. Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests. Nature. 2007;448:692–695. doi: 10.1038/nature06021. PubMed DOI
Nguyen D, et al. Fungal disease incidence along tree diversity gradients depends on latitude in European forests. Ecol. Evol. 2016;6:2426–2438. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2056. PubMed DOI PMC
Nguyen D, et al. Foliar fungi of Betula pendula: Impact of tree species mixtures and assessment methods. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Vincent JB, Weiblen GD, May G. Host associations and beta diversity of fungal endophyte communities in New Guinea rainforest trees. Mol. Ecol. 2016;25:825–841. doi: 10.1111/mec.13510. PubMed DOI
Franić I, et al. Are traded forest tree seeds a potential source of nonnative pests? Ecol. Appl. 2019;29:e01971. doi: 10.1002/eap.1971. PubMed DOI
Arnold AE, Lutzoni F. Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: Are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecology. 2007;88:541–549. doi: 10.1890/05-1459. PubMed DOI
U’Ren JM, et al. Host availability drives distributions of fungal endophytes in the imperilled boreal realm. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019;3:1430–1437. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0975-2. PubMed DOI
Cleary M, Oskay F, Doğmuş HT, Woodward S, Vettraino AM. Cryptic risks to forest biosecurity associated with the global movement of commercial seed. Forests. 2019;10:459. doi: 10.3390/f10050459. DOI
Eschen R, et al. Spotting the pests of tomorrow—Sampling designs for detection of species associations with woody plants. J. Biogeogr. 2019;46:2159–2173. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13670. DOI
Tedersoo L, et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science. 2014;346:6213. doi: 10.1126/science.1256688. PubMed DOI
Phillips HRP, et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science. 2019;366:480–485. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4851. PubMed DOI PMC
Kier G, et al. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. J. Biogeogr. 2005;32:1107–1116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01272.x. DOI
Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Joppa LN. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E2603–E2610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302251110. PubMed DOI PMC
Eschen R, et al. Safeguarding global plant health: the rise of sentinels. J. Pest Sci. (2004). 2019;92:29–36. doi: 10.1007/s10340-018-1041-6. DOI
2021. NCBI Sequence Read Archive. SRP309894
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017;11:2639–2643. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.119. PubMed DOI PMC
Franić I, 2022. Worldwide diversity of endophytic fungi and insects associated with dormant tree twigs. figshare. PubMed DOI PMC
2021. Genbank. MW441337
Toti L, Viret O, Horat G, Petrini O. Detection of the endophyte Discula umbrinella in buds and twigs of Fagus sylvatica. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1993;23:147–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1993.tb00954.x. DOI
Taylor DL, et al. Accurate estimation of fungal diversity and abundance through improved lineage-specific primers optimized for illumina amplicon sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:7217–7226. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02576-16. PubMed DOI PMC
Hartmann M. 2021. martin-hartmann/metabarcoding: metabarcoding_20211019. Zenodo. DOI
Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;10:1–22. PubMed PMC
Herzog C, et al. Microbial succession on decomposing root litter in a drought-prone Scots pine forest. ISME J. 2019;13:2346–2362. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0436-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Edgar, R. SINTAX: a simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences. bioRxiv 074161 10.1101/074161 (2016).
Abarenkov K, et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi – recent updates and future perspectives Rationale. New Phytol. 2010;186:281–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x. PubMed DOI
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9. PubMed
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2007;7:355–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Geer, L. et al. The NCBI BioSystems database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38 (2010). PubMed PMC
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. Worldclim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017;37:4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086. DOI
Chamberlain, S. brranching: Fetch ‘Phylogenies’ from Many Sources. R Packag. version 0.5.0. (2019).
Zanne AE, et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature. 2014;506:89–92. doi: 10.1038/nature12872. PubMed DOI