Laparoscopic synthetic mesh explantation after sacrohysteropexy
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article, Video-Audio Media
PubMed
35254472
DOI
10.1007/s00192-022-05141-5
PII: 10.1007/s00192-022-05141-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Bladder injury, Bowel injury, Laparoscopy, Mesh explantation, Pectopexy, Sacrohysteropexy,
- MeSH
- Surgical Mesh * adverse effects MeSH
- Laparoscopy * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urinary Bladder injuries MeSH
- Device Removal * MeSH
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse * surgery MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Rectum injuries MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Video-Audio Media MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
INTRODUCTION: In this video, we present a case of rectal and bladder injury, which occurred during laparoscopic mesh removal following sacrohysteropexy treated 6 months later with a laparoscopic pectopexy. METHODS: We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with a prolapse recurrence after sacrohysteropexy. During the laparoscopic explantation of the mesh, we detected a fixation of the mesh to the bladder and the rectum rather than a fixation to the vaginal walls. Consequently, bladder and rectal injuries occurred during the dissection and were diagnosed and repaired immediately. Due to bowel injury, the treatment of the prolapse was postponed. Six months later, a laparoscopic pectopexy was performed to avoid complications during the repeated dissection of the promontory. The postoperative recovery after the pectopexy was uncomplicated with no short-term prolapse recurrence or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy appears to be an efficient approach to mesh explantation. Futhermore, laparoscopic pectopexy seems to be a good approach to secondary prolapse reconstruction after sacrohysteropexy mesh explantation avoiding complications during repeated dissection of the promontory.
See more in PubMed
Gluck O, Blaganje M, Veit-Rubin N, Phillips C, Deprest J, O’reilly B, But I, Moore R, Jeffery S, Haddad JM. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive literature review on current practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2020;245:94–101. DOI
Izett-Kay ML, Aldabeeb D, Kupelian AS, Cartwright R, Cutner AS, Jackson S, Price N, Vashisht A. Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(12):2595–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0 . PubMed DOI PMC
Ruess E, Roovers J-P, Jeffery S. Management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. A video case series. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(7):1483–5. DOI
Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, Schaer G. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1207–12. DOI
Siddharth A, Cartwright R, Jackson S, Price N. Laparoscopic complete sacrocolpopexy mesh removal for right-sided gluteal pain and recurrent mesh erosion. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):411–3. DOI
Milani R, Manodoro S, Passoni P, Locatelli L, Barba M, Frigerio M. Surgical management of bladder erosion and pelvic pain after laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):843–5. DOI
Winget VL, Gabra MG, Addis IB, Hatch KK, Heusinkveld JM. Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Patients with Intraabdominal Adhesions, Lumbar Spinal Procedures and other Contraindications to Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series. AJOG Glob Rep. 2021;100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100034 .
Rogo-Gupta L, Castellanos M. When and how to excise vaginal mesh. Current Opinion Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(4):311–5. DOI
Vandendriessche D, Sussfeld J, Giraudet G, Lucot J-P, Behal H, Cosson M. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(2):231–9. DOI