Forest Attendance in the Times of COVID-19-A Case Study on the Example of the Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803
Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
NAZV QK1920272
Ministry of Agriculture
NAZV QK21020371
Ministry of Agriculture
PubMed
35270222
PubMed Central
PMC8909629
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19052529
PII: ijerph19052529
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- COVID-19 pandemic, Czech Republic, forest attendance, government restrictions, payments for ecosystem services,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie MeSH
- lesy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pandemie MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- stromy MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
The COVID-19 pandemic affected people all over the world, including the Czech Republic (CZ). In the CZ, a number of measures were applied in 2020 to reduce the contact between people and their mobility. This article dealt with the importance of forests during the pandemic. Data from 2019 and 2020 were compared. The qualitative data were obtained from two nationwide surveys, the first focused on forest attendance and forest fruit collection (about 1000 respondents per year), the second on the motivation to visit the forests (about 3700 respondents per year). The quantitative data were obtained on the regional level by analysing data from mobility counters. The impact of government restrictions was assessed. Findings: (1) there was a significant increase in the number of people who frequently visited the forest in 2020; (2) in 2020, the amount of households that collected forest fruits increased and was the highest for the monitored period; (3) the increased forest attendance significantly corresponded to the government restrictions. The analysis confirmed the great importance of forests for the citizens and, at the same time, the increased pressure on the forests' use-forest attendance and forest crops picking-(especially suburban ones) in times of COVID-19 restrictions.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Komenda M., Karolyi M., Bulhart V., Žofka J., Brauner T., Hak J., Jarkovský J., Mužík J., Blaha M., Kubát J., et al. COVID-19: Přehled aktuální situace v ČR. Onemocnění aktuálně/COVID-19: Overview of the Current Situation in the Czech Republic. Disease Currently Praha: Minis-Terstvo Zdravotnictví ČR. 2020. [(accessed on 29 July 2021)]. Available online: https://onemocneni-aktualne.mzcr.cz/covid-19.
Vláda Č.R. Government of the Czech Republic. Mimořádná a Ochranná Opatření—co Aktuálně Platí/Extraordinary and Protective Measures—What Currently Applies. 2021. [(accessed on 18 July 2021)]. Available online: https://www.vlada.cz/cz/epidemie-koronaviru/dulezite-informace/nouzovy-stav-a-mimoradna-opatreni-_-co-aktualne-plati-180234/#volny_pohyb.
Stockwell S., Trott M., Tully M., Shin J., Barnett Y., Butler L., McDermott D., Schuch F., Smith L. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: A systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2021;7:e000960. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000960. PubMed DOI PMC
Schmidt S.C.E., Anedda B., Burchartz A., Eichsteller A., Kolb S., Nigg C., Niessner C., Oriwol D., Worth A., Woll A. Physical activity and screen time of children and adolescents before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: A natural experiment. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:21780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78438-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Bourdas D.I., Zacharakis E.D. Evolution of changes in physical activity over lockdown time: Physical activity datasets of four independent adult sample groups corresponding to each of the last four of the six COVID-19 lockdown weeks in Greece. Data Brief. 2020;32:106301. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106301. PubMed DOI PMC
Štveráková T., Jačisko J., Busch A., Šafářová M., Kolář P., Kobesová A. The impact of COVID-19 on Physical Activity of Czech children. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0254244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254244. PubMed DOI PMC
CZSO Český Statistický Úřad/Czech Statistical Office. Výsledky Sčítání Lidu, Domů a Bytů 2011/Results of the 2011 Census of Population, Housing and Dwellings 2011. 2011. [(accessed on 12 April 2021)]. Available online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/otevrena_data_pro_vysledky_scitani_lidu_domu_a_bytu_2011_sldb_2011.
Fiorillo A., Gorwood P. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. Eur. Psychiatry. 2020;63:e32. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.35. PubMed DOI PMC
Xie J., Luo S., Furuya K., Sun D. Urban Parks as Green Buffers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2020;12:6751. doi: 10.3390/su12176751. DOI
Nicolás E.S. WHO Warning on Lockdown Mental Health. 2020. [(accessed on 14 April 2021)]. Available online: https://euobserver.com/coronavirus/147903.
Duan L., Zhu G. Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:300–302. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Huang Y., Wang Y., Wang H., Liu Z., Yu X., Yan J., Yu Y., Kou C., Xu X., Lu J., et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in China: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:211–224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X. PubMed DOI
Ahmed M.Z., Ahmed O., Aibao Z., Hanbin S., Siyu L., Ahmad A. Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;51:102092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102092. PubMed DOI PMC
Javed B., Sarwer A., Soto E.B., Mashwani Z.-U.-R. The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic’s impact on mental health. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2020;35:993–996. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3008. PubMed DOI PMC
Serafini G., Parmigiani B., Amerio A., Aguglia A., Sher L., Amore M. The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. QJM Int. J. Med. 2020;113:531–537. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa201. PubMed DOI PMC
MZČR Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví České Republiky/Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. Dopady Krize Způsobené Koronavirem SARS-CoV-2 a Duševního Zdraví Populace ČR—Zpráva Pracovní Skupiny Rady Vlády pro Duševní Zdraví/Impacts of the Crisis Caused by the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the Mental Health of the Population of the Czech Republic—Working Report Government Council Group on Mental Health. 2021. [(accessed on 12 April 2021)]. Available online: https://www.mzcr.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Dopady-krize-zp%C5%AFsoben%C3%A9-koronavirem-SARS-CoV-2-a-du%C5%A1evn%C3%ADho-zdrav%C3%AD-populace-%C4%8CR.pdf.
Hlaváčková P., Slováčková H., Březina D., Michal J. Comparison of results of visitor arrival monitoring using regression analysis. J. For. Sci. 2018;64:303–312.
Krejčí H., Stárová M., Hrbek I., Navrátilová M., Beranová M. The perception of forests by the Czech Republic general public. J. For. Sci. 2019;65:226–233. doi: 10.17221/138/2018-JFS. DOI
Riedl M., Jarský V., Zahradník D., Palátová P., Dudík R., Meňházová J., Šišák L. Analysis of Significant Factors Influencing the Amount of Collected Forest Berries in the Czech Republic. Forests. 2020;11:1114. doi: 10.3390/f11101114. DOI
Riedl M., Jarský V., Palátová P., Sloup R. The Challenges of the Forestry Sector Communication Based on an Analysis of Research Studies in the Czech Republic. Forests. 2019;10:935. doi: 10.3390/f10110935. DOI
Sisak L., Riedl M., Dudik R. Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—Their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use. Land Use Policy. 2016;50:390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006. DOI
Šodková M., Purwestri R.C., Riedl M., Jarský V., Hájek M. Drivers and Frequency of Forest Visits: Results of a National Survey in the Czech Republic. Forests. 2020;11:414. doi: 10.3390/f11040414. DOI
Hansen K., Malmaeus M. Ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Scand. J. For. Res. 2016;31:626–640. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888. DOI
Bell S. Forest recreation: New opportunities and challenges for forest managers. Radovi. 2007;10:163–168.
Karjalainen E., Sarjala T., Raitio H. Promoting human health through forests: Overview and major challenges. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2010;15:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12199-008-0069-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Meyer-Schulz K., Bürger-Arndt R. Reviewing the psychological and physical health effects of forests. Sante Publique. 2019;31:115–134. doi: 10.3917/spub.190.0115. PubMed DOI
Hansmann R., Hug S.-M., Seeland K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban For. Urban Green. 2007;6:213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004. DOI
Derks J., Giessen L., Winkel G. COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. For. Policy Econ. 2020;118:102253. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253. PubMed DOI PMC
Venter Z.S., Barton D.N., Gundersen V., Figari H., Nowell M. Urban nature in a time of crisis: Recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15:104075. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396. DOI
Grima N., Corcoran W., Hill-James C., Langton B., Sommer H., Fisher B. The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0243344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243344. PubMed DOI PMC
Pichlerová M., Önkal D., Bartlett A., Výbošťok J., Pichler V. Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073469. PubMed DOI PMC
Jůza R., Jarský V., Riedl M., Zahradník D., Šišák L. Possibilities for Harmonisation between Recreation Services and Their Production within the Forest Sector—A Case Study of Municipal Forest Enterprise Hradec Králové (CZ) Forests. 2020;12:13. doi: 10.3390/f12010013. DOI
McCulloch C.E., Searle S.R. Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models. Willey; New York, NY, USA: 2001. p. 335.
Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future; Washington, DC, USA: 1989.
Sen M., Singer B. Forests: At the Heart of Green Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Policy Brief No. 80. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2020. [(accessed on 11 February 2022)]. Available online: https://www.un.org/esa/forests/news/2020/06/policy-brief-on-forests-and-covid-19/index.html.
Weinbrenner H., Breithut J., Hebermehl W., Kaufmann A., Klinger T., Palm T., Wirth K. “The Forest Has Become Our New Living Room”—The Critical Importance of Urban Forests During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2021;4:4. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.672909. DOI
Wunder S., Kaimowitz D., Jensen S., Feder S. Coronavirus, macroeconomy, and forests: What likely impacts? For. Policy Econ. 2021;131:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102536. PubMed DOI PMC
McGinlay J., Gkoumas V., Holtvoeth J., Fuertes R.F.A., Bazhenova E., Benzoni A., Botsch K., Martel C.C., Sánchez C.C., Cervera I., et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Management of European Protected Areas and Policy Implications. Forests. 2020;11:1214. doi: 10.3390/f11111214. DOI
Wunder S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2015;117:234–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016. DOI
Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2008;65:712–724. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033. DOI
Amacher G.S., Ollikainen M., Uusivuori J. Forests and ecosystem services: Outlines for new policy options. For. Policy Econ. 2014;47:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.002. DOI
Matthies B.D., Kalliokoski T., Ekholm T., Hoen H.F., Valsta L.T. Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015;16:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.006. DOI
Báliková K., Dobšinská Z., Paletto A., Sarvašová Z., Hillayová M.K.K., Štěrbová M., Výbošťok J., Šálka J. The Design of the Payments for Water-Related Ecosystem Services: What Should the Ideal Payment in Slovakia Look Like? Water. 2020;12:1583. doi: 10.3390/w12061583. DOI
Davies H.J., Doick K.J., Hudson M.D., Schaafsma M., Schreckenberg K., Valatin G. Business attitudes towards funding ecosystem services provided by urban forests. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018;32:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.006. DOI
Górriz-Mifsud E., Govigli V.M., Bonet J.A. What to do with mushroom pickers in my forest? Policy tools from the landowners’ perspective. Land Use Policy. 2017;63:450–460. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.003. DOI
De Aragón J.M., Riera P., Giergiczny M., Colinas C. Value of wild mushroom picking as an environmental service. For. Policy Econ. 2011;13:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.003. DOI
Copena D., Pérez-Neira D., Vázquez A.M., Simón X. Community forest and mushrooms: Collective action initiatives in rural areas of Galicia. For. Policy Econ. 2021;135:102660. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102660. DOI
Zákon Č. 289/1995 Sb., o Lesích a o Změně a Doplnění Některých Zákonů (Lesní Zákon) [(accessed on 29 July 2021)]. Available online: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/legislativa/pravni-predpisy-mze/tematicky-prehled/Legislativa-MZe_uplna-zneni_zakon-1995-289-viceoblasti.html.
Lovrić M., Da Re R., Vidale E., Prokofieva I., Wong J., Pettenella D., Verkerk P.J., Mavsar R. Non-wood forest products in Europe—A quantitative overview. For. Policy Econ. 2020;116:102175. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102175. DOI
Kajala L., Almik A., Dahl R., Dikšaité L., Erkkonen J., Fredman P., Jensen F., Søndergaard K., Sievānen T., Skov-Petersen H., et al. Visitor Monitoring in Nature Areas—A Manual Based on Experiences from the Nordic and Baltic Countries. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; Bromma, Sweden: 2007.
Baskent E.Z., Borges J.G., Kašpar J., Tahri M. A Design for Addressing Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning. Forests. 2020;11:1108. doi: 10.3390/f11101108. DOI
Kurttila M., Tahvanainen V., editors. Description of New Decision Support Tools for Optimization of MPT and NWFP Management. Deliverable 2.4. FP7 Project No. 311919 KBBE.2012.1.2-06. European Commission; Brussels, Belgium: 2016. p. 106.
Tahri M., Kaspar J., Vacik H., Marusak R. Multi-attribute decision making and geographic information systems: Potential tools for evaluating forest ecosystem services. Ann. For. Sci. 2021;78:41. doi: 10.1007/s13595-021-01049-0. DOI