Evaluating Rates of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Among Young Adults With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: The Young ESUS Longitudinal Cohort Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35285869
PubMed Central
PMC8922202
DOI
10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0048
PII: 2790077
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda * diagnóza epidemiologie etiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- embolická cévní mozková příhoda * MeSH
- foramen ovale apertum * komplikace MeSH
- ischemická cévní mozková příhoda * MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
IMPORTANCE: Cryptogenic strokes constitute approximately 40% of ischemic strokes in young adults, and most meet criteria for the embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Two randomized clinical trials, NAVIGATE ESUS and RESPECT ESUS, showed a high rate of stroke recurrence in older adults with ESUS but the prognosis and prognostic factors among younger individuals with ESUS is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of and factors associated with recurrent ischemic stroke and death and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) among young adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter longitudinal cohort study with enrollment from October 2017 to October 2019 and a mean follow-up period of 12 months ending in October 2020 included 41 stroke research centers in 13 countries. Consecutive patients 50 years and younger with a diagnosis of ESUS were included. Of 576 screened, 535 participants were enrolled after 1 withdrew consent, 41 were found to be ineligible, and 2 were excluded for other reasons. The final follow-up visit was completed by 520 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Recurrent ischemic stroke and/or death, recurrent ischemic stroke, and prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of participants was 40.4 (7.3) years, and 297 (56%) participants were male. The most frequent vascular risk factors were tobacco use (240 patients [45%]), hypertension (118 patients [22%]), and dyslipidemia (109 patients [20%]). PFO was detected in 177 participants (50%) who had transthoracic echocardiograms with bubble studies. Following initial ESUS, 468 participants (88%) were receiving antiplatelet therapy, and 52 (10%) received anticoagulation. The recurrent ischemic stroke and death rate was 2.19 per 100 patient-years, and the ischemic stroke recurrence rate was 1.9 per 100 patient-years. Of the recurrent strokes, 9 (64%) were ESUS, 2 (14%) were cardioembolic, and 3 (21%) were of other determined cause. AF was detected in 15 participants (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.6-4.6). In multivariate analysis, the following were associated with recurrent ischemic stroke: history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (hazard ratio, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.8-15), presence of diabetes (hazard ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.5-13), and history of coronary artery disease (hazard ratio, 10; 95% CI, 4.8-22). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this large cohort of young adult patients with ESUS, there was a relatively low rate of subsequent ischemic stroke and a low frequency of new-onset AF. Most recurrent strokes also met the criteria for ESUS, suggesting the need for future studies to improve our understanding of the underlying stroke mechanism in this population.
Department of Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Medicine Neurology McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
Department of Neurolog Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford Stroke Center Stanford California
Department of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
Department of Neurology Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia
Department of Neurology University Hospital Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Neurosciences Western University London Ontario Canada
Department of Statistics Hamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada
Division of Brain Sciences Imperial College The Hammersmith Hospital London United Kingdom
Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Institute for Neurological Research FLENI Buenos Aires Argentina
Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
National Institute of Neurology La Fama Tlalpan México
Neurology Service Bichat Hospital Paris France
Population Health Research Institute Hamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada
Zobrazit více v PubMed
GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. Published online September 3, 2021. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Béjot Y, Delpont B, Giroud M. Rising stroke incidence in young adults: more epidemiological evidence, more questions to be answered. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(5):5. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003661 PubMed DOI PMC
Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, et al. ; GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group . Stroke prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years in adults aged 20-64 years in 1990-2013: data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):190-202. doi:10.1159/000441098 PubMed DOI
Hart RG, Catanese L, Perera KS, Ntaios G, Connolly SJ. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: a systematic review and clinical update. Stroke. 2017;48(4):867-872. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016414 PubMed DOI
Perera KS, Vanassche T, Bosch J, et al. ; ESUS Global Registry Investigators . Embolic strokes of undetermined source: Prevalence and patient features in the ESUS Global Registry. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(5):526-533. doi:10.1177/1747493016641967 PubMed DOI
Ladeira F, Barbosa R, Caetano A, Mendonça MD, Calado S, Viana-Baptista M. Embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) in young patients. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(suppl A100):165. doi:10.1111/ijs.12596 PubMed DOI
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35-41. doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35 PubMed DOI
Hart RG, Diener H-C, Coutts SB, et al. ; Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group . Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429-438. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7 PubMed DOI
Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H, et al. ; NAVIGATE ESUS Investigators . Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2191-2201. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1802686 PubMed DOI
Diener H-C, Sacco RL, Easton JD, et al. ; RE-SPECT ESUS Steering Committee and Investigators . Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1906-1917. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1813959 PubMed DOI
Perera KS, Swaminathan B, Veltkamp R, et al. . Frequency and features of embolic stroke of undetermined source in young adults. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3(2):110-116. doi:10.1177/2396987318755585 PubMed DOI PMC
Nassif M, Annink ME, Yang H, et al. . Long-term (>10-year) clinical follow-up after young embolic stroke/TIA of undetermined source. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(1):7-11. doi:10.1177/1747493019884520 PubMed DOI PMC
Martinez-Majander N, Aarnio K, Pirinen J, et al. . Embolic strokes of undetermined source in young adults: baseline characteristics and long-term outcome. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(3):535-541. doi:10.1111/ene.13540 PubMed DOI
Janssen PM, Visser NA, Dorhout Mees SM, Klijn CJ, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin scale. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29(2):137-139. doi:10.1159/000262309 PubMed DOI
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. . An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century. a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064-2089. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca PubMed DOI PMC
Veltkamp R, Pearce LA, Korompoki E, et al. . Characteristics of recurrent ischemic stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(10):1233-1240. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1995 PubMed DOI PMC
Svendsen JH, Diederichsen SZ, Højberg S, et al. . Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (the LOOP study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10310):1507-1516. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01698-6 PubMed DOI
Healey JS, Gladstone DJ, Swaminathan B, et al. ; Secondary Analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Clinical Trial . Recurrent stroke with rivaroxaban compared with aspirin according to predictors of atrial fibrillation: secondary analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(7):764-773. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0617 PubMed DOI PMC
Poli S, Meissner C, Baezner HJ, et al. . Apixaban for treatment of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ATTICUS) randomized trial—update of patient characteristics and study timeline after interim. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(suppl 1):ehab724.2070. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2070 DOI
Yuan K, Kasner SE. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018;3(2):84-91. doi:10.1136/svn-2018-000173 PubMed DOI PMC
Homma S, Sacco RL. Patent foramen ovale and stroke. Circulation. 2005;112(7):1063-1072. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.524371 PubMed DOI
Koutroulou I, Tsivgoulis G, Tsalikakis D, Karacostas D, Grigoriadis N, Karapanayiotides T. Epidemiology of patent foramen ovale in general population and in stroke patients: a narrative review. Front Neurol. 2020;11:281. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00281 PubMed DOI PMC
Hart RG. Cardiogenic embolism to the brain. Lancet. 1992;339(8793):589-594. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)90873-2 PubMed DOI