BACKGROUND: The last definition of the post-enucleation socket syndrome (PESS) by Tyers and Collin-formulated almost 40 years ago in 1982-is predominantly based on the clinical characteristics and does not include the insights of newer studies into the pathophysiological mechanism of the PESS. METHODS: A systematic PubMed literature review regarding the pathophysiological mechanism of the PESS was performed, and results were comprised to give an overview of the current knowledge of the PESS including the exact pathophysiological mechanism. RESULTS: The primarily postulated pathophysiological mechanism of the PESS was the atrophy of orbital tissues, especially of fat, resulting in variable clinical findings. Newer studies using high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging or performing histopathological analyses found no orbital fat atrophy but rather a rotatory displacement of the orbital tissues from superior to posterior and from posterior to inferior together with the retraction of the extraocular muscles and a possible volume loss of the orbital implant by resorption if it is manufactured from hydroxyapatite. PESS results in a backward tilt of the superior fornix, a deep superior sulcus, a pseudo-ptosis, a lower eyelid elongation and laxity, a shallower inferior fornix, as well as enophthalmos and may lead to an inability of wearing ocular prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: A novel and comprehensive definition of the PESS is proposed: PESS is a multifactorial and variable syndrome caused by a rotatory displacement of orbital contents together with the retraction of the extraocular muscles and possible resorption of the orbital implant if it is manufactured from hydroxyapatite.

Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf Cologne Germany

Department of Craniofacial Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Ophthalmology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Kerpener Straße 62 50924 Cologne Germany

Ophthalmology Clinic University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

School of Optometry and Vision Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

Trester Institute for Ocular Prosthetics and Artificial Eyes Cologne Germany

See more in PubMed

Rokohl AC, Mor JM, Trester M, Koch KR, Heindl LM. Rehabilitation of anophthalmic patients with prosthetic eyes in Germany today - supply possibilities, daily use, complications and psychological aspects. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019;236:54–62. doi: 10.1055/a-0764-4974. PubMed DOI

Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Adler W, Trester M, Trester W, Pine NS, Pine KR, Heindl LM. Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:1203–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3942-8. PubMed DOI

Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Trester M, Trester W, Pine KR, Heindl LM. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing cryolite glass prosthetic eyes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34:369–374. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001021. PubMed DOI

Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02381.x. PubMed DOI

Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR. An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers. Orbit. 2017;36:401–406. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1337201. PubMed DOI

Tyers AG, Collin JR. Orbital implants and post enucleation socket syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1982;102(Pt 1):90–92. PubMed

Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ. Clinical Ocular Prosthetics. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2015.

Smit TJ, Koornneef L, Zonneveld FW, Groet E, Otto AJ. Computed tomography in the assessment of the postenucleation socket syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1347–1351. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32411-9. PubMed DOI

Detorakis ET, Engstrom RE, Straatsma BR, Demer JL. Functional anatomy of the anophthalmic socket: insights from magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4307–4313. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0171. PubMed DOI

Han LS, Keillor RB, Weatherhead RG. Case series of shrinking hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1338–1340. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319397. PubMed DOI

Heindl LM, Trester M, Guo Y, Zwiener F, Sadat N, Pine NS, Pine KR, Traweger A, Rokohl AC. Anxiety and depression in patients wearing prosthetic eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:495–503. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04908-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Goto T, Kojima T, Iijima T, Yokokura S, Kawano H, Yamamoto A, Matsuda K. Resorption of synthetic porous hydroxyapatite and replacement by newly formed bone. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:444–447. doi: 10.1007/s007760170013. PubMed DOI

Shah CT, Hughes MO, Kirzhner M. Anophthalmic syndrome: a review of management. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30:361–365. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000217. PubMed DOI

Vistnes LM. Mechanism of upper lid ptosis in the anophthalmic orbit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:539–545. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197611000-00002. PubMed DOI

Ruiters S, Mombaerts I. The prevalence of anophthalmic socket syndrome and its relation to patient quality of life. Eye (Lond) 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01178-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Adenis JP, Robert PY, Boncoeur-Martel MP. Abnormalities of orbital volume. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002;12:345–350. doi: 10.1177/112067210201200501. PubMed DOI

Nadal J, Daien V, Jacques J, Hoa D, Mura F, Villain M. Evisceration with autogenous scleral graft and bioceramic implantation within the modified scleral shell: 133 cases over 17 years. Orbit. 2019;38:19–23. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1464584. PubMed DOI

Camezind P, Robert PY, Adenis JP. Post-enucleation or evisceration socket syndrome. Oper Tech Oculoplas, Orbit Reconstruct Surg. 2001;4:48–51. doi: 10.1076/otoo.4.1.48.8490. DOI