Prediction of Vagal Nerve Stimulation Efficacy in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (PRECISE): Prospective Study for Pre-implantation Prediction/Study Design

. 2022 ; 13 () : 839163. [epub] 20220321

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid35386419

BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can be indicated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, who are not eligible for resective epilepsy surgery. In VNS therapy, the responder rate (i.e., percentage of subjects experiencing ≥50% seizure reduction) is ~50%. At the moment, there is no widely-accepted possibility to predict VNS efficacy in a particular patient based on pre-implantation data, which can lead to unnecessary surgery and improper allocation of financial resources. The principal aim of PRediction of vagal nerve stimulation EfficaCy In drug-reSistant Epilepsy (PRECISE) study is to verify the predictability of VNS efficacy by analysis of pre-implantation routine electroencephalogram (EEG). METHODS: PRECISE is designed as a prospective multicentric study in which patients indicated to VNS therapy will be recruited. Patients will be classified as predicted responders vs. predicted non-responders using pre-implantation EEG analyses. After the first and second year of the study, the real-life outcome (responder vs. non-responder) will be determined. The real-life outcome and predicted outcome will be compared in terms of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In the meantime, the patients will be managed according to the best clinical practice to obtain the best therapeutic response. The primary endpoint will be the accuracy of the statistical model for prediction of response to VNS therapy in terms of responders and non-responders. The secondary endpoint will be the quantification of differences in EEG power spectra (Relative Mean Power, %) between real-life responders and real-life non-responders to VNS therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy and the sensitivity and specificity of the model. DISCUSSION: PRECISE relies on the results of our previous work, through which we developed a statistical classifier for VNS response (responders vs. non-responders) based on differences in EEG power spectra dynamics (Pre-X-Stim). TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04935567.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. (2000) 342:314–9. 10.1056/NEJM200002033420503 PubMed DOI

Kuba R, Brazdil M, Kalina M, Prochazka T, Hovorka J, Nezadal T. Vagus nerve stimulation: longitudinal follow-up of patients treated for 5 years. Seizure. (2009) 18:269–74. 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.10.012 PubMed DOI

Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI. Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response. J Neurosurg. (2011) 115:1248–55. 10.3171/2011.7.JNS11977 PubMed DOI

Englot DJ, Rolston JD, Wang DD, Hassnain KH, Gordon CM, Chang EF. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in posttraumatic versus nontraumatic epilepsy. J Neurosurg. (2012) 117:970–7. 10.3171/2012.8.JNS122 PubMed DOI

Englot DJ, Rolston JD, Wright CW, Hassnain KH, Chang EF. Rates and predictors of seizure freedom with vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy. Neurosurgery. (2016) 79:345–53. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001165 PubMed DOI PMC

Brázdil M, DoleŽalová I, Koritáková E, Chládek J, Roman R, Pail M. EEG reactivity predicts individual efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in intractable epileptics. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:392. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00392 PubMed DOI PMC

Koritakova E, Dolezalova I, Chladek J, Jurkova T, Chrastina J, Plesinger F. A novel statistical model for predicting the efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in patients with epilepsy (Pre-X-Stim) is applicable to different EEG systems. Front Neurosci. (2021) 15:635787. 10.3389/fnins.2021.635787 PubMed DOI PMC

Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, Brodie MJ, Hauser WA, Mathern G. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia. (2010) 51:1069–77. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x PubMed DOI

Jobst BC, Cascino GD. Resective epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: a review. JAMA. (2015) 313:285–93. 10.1001/jama.2014.17426 PubMed DOI

Giordano F, Zicca A, Barba C, Guerrini R, Genitori L. Vagus nerve stimulation: surgical technique of implantation and revision and related morbidity. Epilepsia. (2017) 58(Suppl. 1):85–90. 10.1111/epi.13678 PubMed DOI

Chrastina J, Novak Z, Zeman T, Kocvarova J, Pail M, Dolezalova I. Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a 10-17 year follow-up study. Seizure. (2018) 59:41–7. 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.04.022 PubMed DOI

Ryvlin P, Gilliam FG, Nguyen DK, Colicchio G, Iudice A, Tinuper P. The long-term effect of vagus nerve stimulation on quality of life in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy: the PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) trial. Epilepsia. (2014) 55:893–900. 10.1111/epi.12611 PubMed DOI PMC

Beckstead RM, Morse JR, Norgren R. The nucleus of the solitary tract in the monkey: projections to the thalamus and brain stem nuclei. J Comp Neurol. (1980) 190:259–82. 10.1002/cne.901900205 PubMed DOI

Rutecki P. Anatomical, physiological, and theoretical basis for the antiepileptic effect of vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia. (1990) 31(Suppl. 2):S1–6. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05843.x PubMed DOI

Vonck K, De Herdt V, Bosman T, Dedeurwaerdere S, Van Laere K, Boon P, et al. . Thalamic and limbic involvement in the mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation, a SPECT study. Seizure. (2008) 17:699–706. 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.05.001 PubMed DOI

Hachem LD, Wong SM, Ibrahim GM. The vagus afferent network: emerging role in translational connectomics. Neurosurgical Focus. (2018) 45:E2. 10.3171/2018.6.FOCUS18216 PubMed DOI

Ibrahim GM, Sharma P, Hyslop A, Guillen MR, Morgan BR, Wong S. Presurgical thalamocortical connectivity is associated with response to vagus nerve stimulation in children with intractable epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. (2017) 16:634–42. 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.09.015 PubMed DOI PMC

Babajani-Feremi A, Noorizadeh N, Mudigoudar B, Wheless JW. Predicting seizure outcome of vagus nerve stimulation using MEG-based network topology. Neuroimage Clinl. (2018) 19:990–9. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.017 PubMed DOI PMC

Mithani K, Mikhail M, Morgan BR, Wong S, Weil AG, Deschenes S. Connectomic profiling identifies responders to vagus nerve stimulation. Ann Neurol. (2019) 86:743–53. 10.1002/ana.25574 PubMed DOI

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04935567

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...