Cell viscoelastic properties are affected by the cell cycle, differentiation, and pathological processes such as malignant transformation. Therefore, evaluation of the mechanical properties of the cells proved to be an approach to obtaining information on the functional state of the cells. Most of the currently used methods for cell mechanophenotyping are limited by low robustness or the need for highly expert operation. In this paper, the system and method for viscoelasticity measurement using shear stress induction by fluid flow is described and tested. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) is used for image acquisition because this technique enables one to quantify optical path length delays introduced by the sample, thus providing a label-free objective measure of morphology and dynamics. Viscosity and elasticity determination were refined using a new approach based on the linear system model and parametric deconvolution. The proposed method allows high-throughput measurements during live-cell experiments and even through a time lapse, whereby we demonstrated the possibility of simultaneous extraction of shear modulus, viscosity, cell morphology, and QPI-derived cell parameters such as circularity or cell mass. Additionally, the proposed method provides a simple approach to measure cell refractive index with the same setup, which is required for reliable cell height measurement with QPI, an essential parameter for viscoelasticity calculation. Reliability of the proposed viscoelasticity measurement system was tested in several experiments including cell types of different Young/shear modulus and treatment with cytochalasin D or docetaxel, and an agreement with atomic force microscopy was observed. The applicability of the proposed approach was also confirmed by a time-lapse experiment with cytochalasin D washout, whereby an increase of stiffness corresponded to actin repolymerization in time.

Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic; Department of Pathological Physiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Pathological Physiology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Tissue Biomechanics and Numerical Modelling in Medicine Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Coughlin M.F., Bielenberg D.R., et al. Fredberg J.J. Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential. Clin. Exp. metastasis. 2013;30:237–250. PubMed PMC

Wirtz D., Konstantopoulos K., Searson P.C. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:512–522. PubMed PMC

Bufi N., Saitakis M., et al. Asnacios A. Human primary immune cells exhibit distinct mechanical properties that are modified by inflammation. Biophysical J. 2015;108:2181–2190. PubMed PMC

Jacobi A., Rosendahl P., et al. Guck J. Stem Cell Mobilization. Springer; 2019. Analysis of biomechanical properties of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using real-time fluorescence and deformability cytometry; pp. 135–148. PubMed

Moeendarbary E., Harris A.R. Cell mechanics: principles, practices, and prospects. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2014;6:371–388. PubMed PMC

Hao Y., Cheng S., et al. Li M. Mechanical properties of single cells: measurement methods and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020;45:107648. PubMed

Wu P.-H., Aroush D.R.-B., et al. Wirtz D. A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties. Nat. Methods. 2018;15:491–498. PubMed PMC

Alibert C., Goud B., Manneville J.-B. Are cancer cells really softer than normal cells? Biol. Cell. 2017;109:167–189. PubMed

Rother J., Nöding H., et al. Janshoff A. Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open Biol. 2014;4:140046. PubMed PMC

Raudenska M., Kratochvilova M., et al. Masarik M. Cisplatin enhances cell stiffness and decreases invasiveness rate in prostate cancer cells by actin accumulation. Scientific Rep. 2019;9:1–11. PubMed PMC

Eaton P., Batziou K. Artifacts and practical issues in atomic force microscopy. At. force Microsc. 2019;1886:3–28. PubMed

Eldridge W.J., Sheinfeld A., et al. Wax A. Imaging deformation of adherent cells due to shear stress using quantitative phase imaging. Opt. Lett. 2016;41:352–355. PubMed

Eldridge W.J., Ceballos S., et al. Wax A. Shear modulus measurement by quantitative phase imaging and correlation with atomic force microscopy. Biophysical J. 2019;117:696–705. PubMed PMC

Rappaz B., Marquet P., et al. Magistretti P.J. Measurement of the integral refractive index and dynamic cell morphometry of living cells with digital holographic microscopy. Opt. Express. 2005;13:9361–9373. PubMed

Slaby T., Kolman P., et al. Chmelik R. Off-axis setup taking full advantage of incoherent illumination in coherence-controlled holographic microscope. Opt. Express. 2013;21:14747–14762. PubMed

ibidi GmbH Application Note 11 Shear Stress and Shear Rates for Ibidi Μ-Slides Based on Numerical Calculations Version 5.0. 2021. https://ibidi.com/img/cms/support/AN/AN11_Shear_stress.pdf

Park Y., Depeursinge C., Popescu G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat. Photon. 2018;12:578–589.

Wu T., Feng J.J. A biomechanical model for fluidization of cells under dynamic strain. Biophysical J. 2015;108:43–52. PubMed PMC

Vicar T., Gumulec J., et al. Masarik M. 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society. EMBC; 2021. Parametric deconvolution for cancer cells viscoelasticity measurements from quantitative phase images; pp. 439–442. PubMed

Boothe T., Hilbert L., et al. Rink J.C. A tunable refractive index matching medium for live imaging cells, tissues and model organisms. Elife. 2017;6:e27240. PubMed PMC

Wakatsuki T., Schwab B., et al. Elson E.L. Effects of cytochalasin D and latrunculin B on mechanical properties of cells. J. Cel. Sci. 2001;114:1025–1036. PubMed

Wang K., Sun X.H., et al. Chen J. Characterization of cytoplasmic viscosity of hundreds of single tumour cells based on micropipette aspiration. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019;6:181707. PubMed PMC

Xiao H., Verdier-Pinard P., et al. Orr G.A. Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2006;103:10166–10173. https://www.pnas.org/content/103/27/10166 PubMed PMC

Thurston G., Jaggi B., Palcic B. Measurement of cell motility and morphology with an automated microscope system. Cytometry: J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol. 1988;9:411–417. PubMed

Vicar T., Raudenska M., et al. Balvan J. The quantitative-phase dynamics of apoptosis and lytic cell death. Scientific Rep. 2020;10:1–12. PubMed PMC

Ojima K., Lin Z.-X., et al. Mermelstein C. Distinctive effects of cytochalasin B in chick primary myoblasts and fibroblasts. PloS one. 2016;11:e0154109. PubMed PMC

Kim K., Park W.S., et al. Park Y. Correlative three-dimensional fluorescence and refractive index tomography: bridging the gap between molecular specificity and quantitative bioimaging. Biomed. Opt. express. 2017;8:5688–5697. PubMed PMC

Liu P.Y., Chin L.K., et al. Leprince-Wang Y. Cell refractive index for cell biology and disease diagnosis: past, present and future. Lab Chip. 2016;16:634–644. doi: 10.1039/C5LC01445J. PubMed DOI

Nehls S., Nöding H., et al. Janshoff A. Stiffness of MDCK II cells depends on confluency and cell size. Biophysical J. 2019;116:2204–2211. PubMed PMC

Chiou Y.-W., Lin H.-K., et al. Yeh M.-L. The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment. PloS one. 2013;8:e77384. PubMed PMC

Spedden E., White J.D., et al. Staii C. Elasticity maps of living neurons measured by combined fluorescence and atomic force microscopy. Biophysical J. 2012;103:868–877. PubMed PMC

Zemła J., Bobrowska J., et al. Lekka M. Indenting soft samples (hydrogels and cells) with cantilevers possessing various shapes of probing tip. Eur. Biophys. J. 2020;49:485–495. PubMed PMC

Adeniba O.O., Corbin E.A., et al. Bashir R. Simultaneous time-varying viscosity, elasticity, and mass measurements of single adherent cancer cells across cell cycle. Scientific Rep. 2020;10:1–12. PubMed PMC

Yun X., Tang M., et al. Wang H. Interrogation of drug effects on HeLa cells by exploiting new AFM mechanical biomarkers. RSC Adv. 2017;7:43764–43771. doi: 10.1039/C7RA06233H. DOI

Shimolina L.E., Gulin A.A., et al. Shirmanova M.V. Mapping cisplatin-induced viscosity alterations in cancer cells using molecular rotor and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2020;25:1–16. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.12.126004. PubMed DOI PMC

Guyer M., Claus P.E. Increased viscosity of cells of induced tumors. Cancer Res. 1942;2:16–18.

Long-term zinc treatment alters the mechanical properties and metabolism of prostate cancer cells

Primary assessment of medicines for expected migrastatic potential with holographic incoherent quantitative phase imaging