Virtual reality intervention as a support method during wound care and rehabilitation after burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Scotland Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
PubMed
35490982
DOI
10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102837
PII: S0965-2299(22)00039-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Burns, Pain management, Physiotherapy, Virtual technology,
- MeSH
- bolest MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- management bolesti metody MeSH
- popálení * terapie MeSH
- terapie pomocí virtuální reality * MeSH
- virtuální realita * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) interventions in the prevention of pain, fear and anxiety during burn wound care procedures. METHODS: In September and October 2021, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant randomized controlled and crossover studies. Two independent authors described the following inclusion criteria for the search: patients undergoing burn wound care with applied VR treatment compared to any other or non-VR intervention. From a total of 1171 records, 25 met the inclusion criteria. After full-text screening, seven publications were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed for 18 studies by two independent authors. RevMan 5.4 was used for the statistical analysis, meta-analysis and visual presentation of the results. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between VR treatment and standard care when analyzing pain outcome during wound care procedures (SMD = -0.49; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.15]; I2 = 41%) and in subgroup analysis when immersive VR was incorporated (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI [-1.07, -0.36]; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found between VR treatment and standard care for range of motion outcome (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI [-0.23, 1.11]; I2 = 50%). CONCLUSIONS: VR seems to be an effective therapeutic support in burn wound care procedures for reducing pain. However, this systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for more research into the use of VR as a distraction method. Studies on larger groups using similar conditions can provide unequivocal evidence of the effectiveness of VR and enable the inclusion of such intervention in standard medical procedures.
Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy Opole University of Technology Opole Poland
Faculty of Physiotherapy Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences Wroclaw Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org