The tools at our hand to ensure the highest quality, systematicity, transparency and trustworthiness of clinical practice guidelines
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu úvodníky
PubMed
35524418
PubMed Central
PMC9103367
DOI
10.1002/ueg2.12241
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- AGREE-II, AGREE-S, clinical practice guidelines, methodological quality, quality assessment, surgery,
- Publikační typ
- úvodníky MeSH
Czech Health Research Council Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Logullo P, Florez I, Antoniou G, Markar S, López‐Cano M, Silecchia G, et al. AGREE‐S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions – UEG and EAES methodological guide. U Eur Gastroenterol J. 2022;10(4). 10.1002/ueg2.12231 PubMed DOI PMC
Mustafa RA, Garcia CAC, Bhatt M, Riva JJ, Vesely S, Wiercioch W, et al. GRADE notes: how to use GRADE when there is “no” evidence? A case study of the expert evidence approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;137:231–5. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.026 PubMed DOI
Schünemann HJ, Zhang Y, Oxman AD. Distinguishing opinion from evidence in guidelines. BMJ. 2019;366:l4606. 10.1136/bmj.l4606 PubMed DOI
Ford N, Thomas R, Grove J. Transparency: a central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;142:246–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.025 PubMed DOI PMC
Skuja V, force UEGQoCT . Guidelines implementation toolbox. U Eur Gastroenterol J. 2020;8(8):984–6. 10.1177/2050640620960289 PubMed DOI PMC
Yao X, Xia J, Jin Y, Shen Q, Wang Q, Zhu Y, et al. Methodological approaches for developing, reporting, and assessing evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;146:77–85. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.015 PubMed DOI
Tsokani S, Antoniou SA, Moustaki I, López‐Cano M, Antoniou GA, Flórez ID, et al. Guideline assessment project II: statistical calibration informed the development of an AGREE II extension for surgical guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(8):4061–8. 10.1007/s00464-021-08604-w PubMed DOI
Antoniou SA, Tsokani S, Mavridis D, López‐Cano M, Antoniou GA, Stefanidis D, et al. Guideline assessment project: filling the GAP in surgical guidelines: quality improvement initiative by an International Working Group. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):642–51. 10.1097/sla.0000000000003036 PubMed DOI
Adamina M, Bonovas S, Raine T, Spinelli A, Warusavitarne J, Armuzzi A, et al. ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn’s disease: surgical treatment. J Crohn's Colitis. 2020;14(2):155–68. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz187 PubMed DOI
Sun W, An L‐Y, Bao X‐D, Qi Y‐X, Yang T, Li R, et al. Consensus and controversy among severe pancreatitis surgery guidelines: a guideline evaluation based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Gland Surg. 2020;9(5):1551–63. 10.21037/gs-20-444 PubMed DOI PMC
Klugar M, Kantorová L, Pokorná A, Líčeník R, Dušek L, Schünemann HJ, et al. Visual transformation for guidelines presentation of the strength of recommendations and the certainty of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;143:178–85. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.009 PubMed DOI
Fervers B, Burgers JS, Voellinger R, Brouwers M, Browman GP, Graham ID, et al. Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(3):228–36. 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.043257 PubMed DOI
