Implications of ACC/AHA Versus ESC/EAS LDL-C Recommendations for Residual Risk Reduction in ASCVD: A Simulation Study From DA VINCI
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
35567726
PubMed Central
PMC10516778
DOI
10.1007/s10557-022-07343-x
PII: 10.1007/s10557-022-07343-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular disease prevention, Cardiovascular risk, LDL-C, Lipid-lowering, Statins,
- MeSH
- ateroskleróza * diagnóza farmakoterapie epidemiologie MeSH
- chování snižující riziko MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci * diagnóza epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- LDL-cholesterol MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- statiny * terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- LDL-cholesterol MeSH
- statiny * MeSH
PURPOSE: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) recommendations differ between the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (< 70 vs. < 55 mg/dl, respectively). In the DA VINCI study, residual cardiovascular risk was predicted in ASCVD patients. The extent to which relative and absolute risk might be lowered by achieving ACC/AHA versus ESC/EAS LDL-C recommended approaches was simulated. METHODS: DA VINCI was a cross-sectional observational study of patients prescribed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) across 18 European countries. Ten-year cardiovascular risk (CVR) was predicted among ASCVD patients receiving stabilized LLT. For patients with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl, the absolute LDL-C reduction required to achieve an LDL-C of < 70 or < 55 mg/dl (LDL-C of 69 or 54 mg/dl, respectively) was calculated. Relative and absolute risk reductions (RRRs and ARRs) were simulated. RESULTS: Of the 2039 patients, 61% did not achieve LDL-C < 70 mg/dl. For patients with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl, median (interquartile range) baseline LDL-C and 10-year CVR were 93 (81-115) mg/dl and 32% (25-43%), respectively. Median LDL-C reductions of 24 (12-46) and 39 (27-91) mg/dl were needed to achieve an LDL-C of 69 and 54 mg/dl, respectively. Attaining ACC/AHA or ESC/EAS goals resulted in simulated RRRs of 14% (7-25%) and 22% (15-32%), respectively, and ARRs of 4% (2-7%) and 6% (4-9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: In ASCVD patients, achieving ESC/EAS LDL-C goals could result in a 2% additional ARR over 10 years versus the ACC/AHA approach.
1st Medical Faculty Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Advanced Lipid Management and Research Centre Tallaght University Hospital Dublin Ireland
Cardiology Department Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Zielona Góra Zielona Góra Poland
Centre Cardiologique et Vasculaire Thionville France
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels Belgium
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Faculty of Medicine University of Opole Opole Poland
Department of Hypertension Medical University of Łódź Łódź Poland
Department of Internal Medicine 1 University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany
Department of Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Seville Seville Spain
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
Department of Neurology Stroke Centre Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Rigshospitalet Denmark
Emergency Cardiology Department Institute of Cardiology Kiev Ukraine
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Global Biostatistical Science Amgen Ltd Cambridge UK
Global Health Economics Amgen Europe Rotkreuz Switzerland
Hungarian Army Medical Center Budapest Hungary
Imperial Clinical Trials Unit Imperial College London London UK
Imperial Hospitals NHS Trust London UK
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz Linz Austria
Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Netherlands
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School Athens Greece
Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute Łódź Poland
School of Public Health Imperial College London London UK
Slovak Medical University Bratislava Slovakia
Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Universitat Rovira 1 Virgili IISPV CIBERDEM Saint Joan University Hospital Reus Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
World Health Organization (2007). Prevention of cardiovascular disease: guidelines for assessment and management of total cardiovascular risk. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43685. Accessed 30 July 2021.
Dhindsa DS, Sandesara PB, Shapiro MD, Wong ND. The evolving understanding and approach to residual cardiovascular risk management. Review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7(88). PubMed PMC
Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A, 3rd, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549–559. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061894. PubMed DOI
Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. PubMed DOI
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81. PubMed PMC
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group Randomized trial of the effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on peripheral vascular and other major vascular outcomes in 20,536 people with peripheral arterial disease and other high-risk conditions. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(4):645–654. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.054. PubMed DOI
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664. PubMed DOI
Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097–2107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174. PubMed DOI
Jukema JW, Szarek M, Zijlstra LE, et al. Alirocumab in patients with polyvascular disease and recent acute coronary syndrome: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(9):1167–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013. PubMed DOI
Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, et al. Benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus: results from IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial) Circulation. 2018;137(15):1571–1582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030950. PubMed DOI
Bonaca MP, Nault P, Giugliano RP, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with evolocumab and outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from the FOURIER Trial (Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk) Circulation. 2018;137(4):338–350. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032235. PubMed DOI
Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, et al. Achievement of dual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein targets more frequent with the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin and associated with better outcomes in IMPROVE-IT. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1224–1233. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018381. PubMed DOI
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. PubMed DOI
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–e1143. PubMed PMC
Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(39):2999–3058. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw272. PubMed DOI
Ray KK, Molemans B, Schoonen WM, et al. EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 . PubMed
European network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance. EU PAS Register: EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care (20150333). http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=31479. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
Wilson PW, DAgostino R, Sr., Bhatt DL, et al. An international model to predict recurrent cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 2012;125(7):695–703.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.01.014. PubMed DOI
Nishikido T, Fayyad R, Melamed S, Ray KK. TRS2P and LDL-C alone or in combination for predicting absolute benefits from additional LDL-C lowering: analysis from the TNT trial. Atherosclerosis. 2021;322:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.011. PubMed DOI
Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(32):2459–2472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. PubMed DOI PMC
Ference BA, Ray KK, Catapano AL, et al. Mendelian randomization study of ACLY and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(11):1033–1042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806747. PubMed DOI PMC
Ference BA, Cannon CP, Landmesser U, Lüscher TF, Catapano AL, Ray KK. Reduction of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and cardiovascular events with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and statins: an analysis of FOURIER, SPIRE, and the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(27):2540–2545. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx450. PubMed DOI PMC
Khunti K, Danese MD, Kutikova L, et al. Association of a combined measure of adherence and treatment intensity with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis or other cardiovascular risk factors treated with statins and/or ezetimibe. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e185554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5554. PubMed DOI PMC
Nicholls SJ, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Palmer M, Barter PJ. Meta-analysis of comparative efficacy of increasing dose of Atorvastatin versus Rosuvastatin versus Simvastatin on lowering levels of atherogenic lipids (from VOYAGER) Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.651. PubMed DOI
Ballantyne CM, Laufs U, Ray KK, et al. Bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination in patients with hypercholesterolemia and high CVD risk treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(6):593–603. doi: 10.1177/2047487319864671. PubMed DOI PMC
Cannon CP, Khan I, Klimchak AC, Reynolds MR, Sanchez RJ, Sasiela WJ. Simulation of lipid-lowering therapy intensification in a population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiology. 2017;2(9):959–966. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2289. PubMed DOI PMC
Preiss D, Seshasai SRK, Welsh P, et al. Risk of Incident Diabetes With Intensive-Dose Compared With Moderate-Dose Statin Therapy: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(24):2556–2564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.860. PubMed DOI
Ray KK, Dhalwani N, Sibartie M, et al. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels exceed the recommended European threshold for PCSK9i initiation: lessons from the HEYMANS study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022.10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac009 PubMed PMC
Schubert J, Lindahl B, Melhus H, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2020;42(3):243–252. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1011. PubMed DOI PMC
Amarenco P, Kim JS, Labreuche J, et al. A comparison of two LDL cholesterol targets after ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910355. PubMed DOI
Sabatine MS, De Ferrari GM, Giugliano RP, et al. Clinical benefit of evolocumab by severity and extent of coronary artery disease: analysis from FOURIER. Circulation. 2018;138(8):756–766. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034309. PubMed DOI
Betts MB, Milev S, Hoog M, et al. Comparison of recommendations and use of cardiovascular risk equations by health technology assessment agencies and clinical guidelines. Value Health. 2019;22(2):210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.003. PubMed DOI
Al-Shamsi S, Govender RD. Validation of the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) prediction model for recurrent cardiovascular disease among United Arab Emirates Nationals. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05331-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Taylor B, Lothgren M, Villa G, Lindgren P, Van Hout B, Mark D. Differences between observed and predicted cardiovascular event rates using the Framingham and REACH equations: the case of high-intensity statin users in the United Kingdom. Circulation. 2015;132(Suppl 3):A18114.
Danese MD, Pemberton-Ross P, Catterick D, Villa G. Estimation of the increased risk associated with recurrent events or polyvascular atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(3):335–343. doi: 10.1177/2047487319899212. PubMed DOI