Thromboprophylaxis Use in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An International RAND Appropriateness Panel
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
University of Toronto
Hospital for Sick Children
Sick Kids Foundation
University of Ottawa
PubMed
35608932
PubMed Central
PMC9624289
DOI
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac073
PII: 6591364
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Paediatric gastroenterology, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis,
- MeSH
- antikoagulancia terapeutické užití MeSH
- Crohnova nemoc * terapie MeSH
- idiopatické střevní záněty * farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ulcerózní kolitida * terapie MeSH
- žilní tromboembolie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antikoagulancia MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thromboprophylaxis use in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is inconsistent. Current guidelines only support treating children with acute severe colitis with risk factors. We convened an international RAND panel to explore thromboprophylaxis in paediatric IBD inpatients in the context of new evidence. METHODS: We convened a geographically diverse 14-person panel of paediatric gastroenterologists alongside supporting experts. An online survey was sent before an online meeting. Panellists were asked to rate the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised paediatric IBD patients via 27 scenarios of varying ages, gender, and phenotype, with and without thrombotic risk factors. Anonymised results were presented at the meeting. A second modified survey was distributed to all panellists present at the meeting. Results from the second survey constitute the RAND panel results. The validated RAND disagreement index defined disagreement when ≥ 1. RESULTS: The combined outcome of thromboprophylaxis being considered appropriate until discharge and inappropriate to withhold was seen in 20 of 27 scenarios, including: all patients with new-onset acute severe colitis; all flares of known ulcerative colitis, irrespective of risk factors except in pre-pubescent patients with limited disease and no risk factors; and all Crohn's patients with risk factors. Disagreement was seen in five scenarios regarding Crohn's without risk factors, where outcomes were already uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: RAND panels are an established method to assess expert opinion in areas of limited evidence. This work therefore constitutes neither a guideline nor a consensus; however, the findings suggest a need to re-evaluate the role of thromboprophylaxis in future guidelines.
Bacteria Immunology Nutrition Gastroenterology and Omics Group University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Blizard Institute Barts and the London School of Medicine Queen Mary University of London London UK
Cambridge Colorectal Unit Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
CHEO IBD Centre Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Ottawa ON Canada
Child Life and Health University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Department of Gastroenterology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Department of Gastroenterology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust LondonUK
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology Evelina London Children's Hospital London UK
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow UK
Department of Paediatric Surgery Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow UK
Department of Paediatrics Centro Hospitalar São João Porto Portugal
Department of Paediatrics University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Department of Pediatrics University of Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada
Paediatric Gastroenterology Royal London Children's Hospital Barts Health NHS Trust London UK
Pediatric Gastroenterology Department Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
Pediatric Hematology Department Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London London UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kuenzig ME, Bitton A, Carroll MW, et al. . Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in children: a population-based matched cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 2021;15:2031–40. PubMed PMC
Kappelman MD, Horvath-Puho E, Sandler RS, et al. . Thromboembolic risk among Danish children and adults with inflammatory bowel diseases: A population-based nationwide study. Gut 2011;60:937–43. PubMed
Klomberg RC, Aardoom MA, Kemos P, et al. . The incidence and characteristics of venous thromboembolisms in paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease; a prospective international cohort study based on the PIBD-SETQuality Safety Registry. J Crohns Colitis 2022;16:695–707. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab171. PubMed DOI PMC
Turner D, Ruemmele FM, Orlanski-Meyer E, et al. . Management of paediatric ulcerative colitis, part 2: Acute severe colitis: An evidence-based consensus guideline from the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation and the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018;67:292–310. PubMed
Hansen R, Meade S, Beattie RM, et al. . Adaptations to the current ECCO/ESPGHAN guidelines on the management of paediatric acute severe colitis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A RAND appropriateness panel. Gut 2021;70:1044–52. PubMed
Chien KA, Hammad HT, Gerber L, Sheth S, Sockolow R, Kucine N.. Pediatric gastroenterologists’ approach to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018;66:286–8. PubMed PMC
Shen J, Ran ZH, Tong JL, Xiao SD.. Meta-analysis: The utility and safety of heparin in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:653–63. PubMed
Story E, Bijelic V, Penney C, Benchimol EI, Halton J, Mack DR.. Safety of venous thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in children with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021;73:604–9. PubMed
Olivera PA, Zuily S, Kotze PG, et al. . International consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18:857–73. PubMed PMC
Torrente F, Hansen R. Venous thromboembolism in children with inflammatory bowel disease: when is the right time for thromboprophylaxis? J Crohns Colitis 2022;16:691–2. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab221. PubMed DOI
Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. . The Rand/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Both Santa Monica, CA and Arlington, VA: RAND; 2001.
Levine A, Griffiths A, Markowitz J, et al. . Pediatric modification of the Montreal classification for inflammatory bowel disease: The Paris classification. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1314–21. PubMed
Benchimol EI, MacK DR, Nguyen GC, et al. . Incidence, outcomes, and health services burden of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2014;147:803–13.e7; quiz e14. PubMed
Kuenzig ME, Fung SG, Marderfeld L, et al. . Twenty-first century trends in the global epidemiology of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. Gastroenterology 2022;162:1147–59.e4. PubMed
Leizorovicz A, Haugh MC, Chapuis FR, Samama MM, Boissel JP.. Low molecular weight heparin in prevention of perioperative thrombosis. BMJ 1992;305:913–20. PubMed PMC
Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY, et al. . A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 1999;341:793–800. PubMed
McCurdy JD, Ellen Kuenzig M, Spruin S, et al. . Surgery and the subtype of inflammatory bowel disease impact the risk of venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge. Dig Dis Sci 2022;67:2471–9. PubMed