Autonomic Changes Are More Durable After Radiofrequency Than Pulsed Electric Field Pulmonary Vein Ablation
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35863816
DOI
10.1016/j.jacep.2022.04.017
PII: S2405-500X(22)00386-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- atrial fibrillation, autonomic regulation, catheter ablation, ganglionated plexi, pulsed electric field,
- MeSH
- autonomní nervový systém MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nodus sinuatrialis MeSH
- venae pulmonales * chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) energy is associated with a collateral ganglionated plexi ablation. Pulsed electric field (PEF) is a nonthermal energy source that preferentially affects the myocardial cells and spares neural tissue. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether PVI by a PEF compared with RF energy will result in less prominent alteration of the cardiac autonomic nervous system. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent PVI using a novel lattice-tip catheter and PEF energy (n = 18) or a conventional irrigated-tip catheter and RF energy (n = 13). The response of the sinoatrial node and atrioventricular node to extracardiac high-frequency, high-output, right vagal nerve stimulation was evaluated at baseline and during and at the end of the ablation procedure. Substantial reduction in responsiveness was arbitrarily defined as stimulation-inducible pause <1.5 seconds. RESULTS: Reduced response of the sinoatrial node was documented in 13 of 13 (100%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.0001) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. Reduced response of the atrioventricular node was found in 10 of 11 (93%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.002) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. The major effects were observed predominantly during ablation around the right pulmonary veins. Early recovery of ganglionated plexi function was noticed only in the PEF ablation group. RF ablation resulted in higher acceleration of the sinus rhythm compared with PEF ablation (20 ± 13 beats/min vs 12 ± 10 beats/min; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PEF compared with RF energy used for PVI induces significantly weaker and less durable suppression of cardiac autonomic regulations.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org