Mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia using dual-energy lattice-tip focal catheter: early feasibility and safety study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
National Institute for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research
European Union-Next Generation EU
Ministry of Health
PubMed
39478679
PubMed Central
PMC11577951
DOI
10.1093/europace/euae275
PII: 7853050
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Catheter ablation, Pulsed field, Radiofrequency ablation, Ventricular tachycardia,
- MeSH
- akční potenciály MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- design vybavení MeSH
- doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické * MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody přístrojové vybavení škodlivé účinky MeSH
- komorová tachykardie * chirurgie patofyziologie diagnóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdeční katétry * MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment method for recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs). However, at least in part, procedural and clinical outcomes are limited by challenges in generating an adequate lesion size in the ventricular myocardium. We investigated procedural and clinical outcomes of VT ablation using a novel 'large-footprint' catheter that allows the creation of larger lesions either by radiofrequency (RF) or by pulsed field (PF) energy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In prospectively collected case series, we describe our initial experience with VT ablation using a lattice-tip, dual-energy catheter (Sphere-9, Medtronic), and a compatible proprietary electroanatomical mapping system (Affera, Medtronic). The study population consisted of 18 patients (aged 55 ± 15 years, one woman, structural heart disease: 94%, ischaemic heart disease: 56%, left ventricular ejection fraction: 34 ± 10%, electrical storm: 22%) with recurrent sustained VTs and ≥1 previously failed endocardial RF ablation with conventional irrigated-tip catheter in 66% of patients. On average, 12 ± 7 RF and 8 ± 9 PF applications were delivered per patient. In three-fourths of patients undergoing percutaneous epicardial ablation, spasms in coronary angiography were observed after PF applications. All resolved after intracoronary administration of nitrates. No acute phrenic nerve palsy was noted. One patient suffered from a stroke that resolved without sequelae. Post-ablation non-inducibility of VT was achieved in 89% of patients. Ventricular-arrhythmia-free survival at three months was 78%. CONCLUSION: VT ablation using a dual-energy lattice-tip catheter and a novel electroanatomical mapping system is feasible. It allows rapid mapping and effective substrate modification with good outcomes during short-term follow-up.
Cardiac Ablation Solutions Medtronic Minneapolis MN USA
Department of Cardiology IKEM Vídeňská 1958 9 Prague 140 00 Czechia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, Winkel BG, Behr ER, Blom NA et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2022;40:3997–4126. PubMed
Natale A, Zeppenfeld K, Della Bella P, Liu X, Sabbag A, Santangeli P et al. Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward. Europace 2023;25:euad225. PubMed PMC
Ravi V, Poudyal A, Khanal S, Khalil C, Vij A, Sanders D et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2023;66:161–75. PubMed
Della Bella P, Baratto F, Vergara P, Bertocchi P, Santamaria M, Notarstefano P et al. Does timing of ventricular tachycardia ablation affect prognosis in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator? Results from the multicenter randomized PARTITA trial. Circulation 2022;145:1829–38. PubMed
Anter E, Mansour M, Nair DG, Sharma D, Taigen TL, Neuzil P et al. Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. Nat Med 2024;30:2303–10. PubMed PMC
Kitamura T, Hocini M, Bourier F, Martin R, Takigawa M, Frontera A et al. Larger and deeper ventricular lesions using a novel expandable spherical monopolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019;30:1644–51. PubMed
Shapira-Daniels A, Barkagan M, Yavin H, Sroubek J, Reddy VY, Neuzil P et al. Novel irrigated temperature-controlled lattice ablation catheter for ventricular ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019;12:e007661. PubMed PMC
Nies M, Watanabe K, Kawamura I, Santos-Gallego CG, Reddy VY, Koruth JS. Preclinical study of pulsed field ablation of ‘difficult’ ventricular targets: intracavitary mobile structures, interventricular septum and left ventricular free wall. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2024;17:e012734. PubMed PMC
Yokoyama M, Vlachos K, Duchateau J, Sacher F, Jaïs P, Tixier R. Pulsed field epicardial ablation for VT storm: a case report of bail-out therapy. Heart Rhythm 2024. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.021. Online ahead of print. PubMed DOI
Pannone L, Doundoulakis I, Cespón-Fernández M, Eltsov I, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C et al. A large footprint focal catheter toggling between pulsed field and radiofrequency energy: first clinical experience for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace 2024;26:euae193. PubMed PMC
Sosa E, Scanavacca M, d’Avila A, Pilleggi F. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:531–6. PubMed
Peichl P, Wichterle D, Pavlu L, Cihak R, Aldhoon B, Kautzner J. Complications of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a single-center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:684–90. PubMed
Barkagan M, Leshem E, Rottmann M, Sroubek J, Shapira-Daniels A, Anter E. Expandable lattice electrode ablation catheter: a novel radiofrequency platform allowing high current at low density for rapid, titratable, and durable lesions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019;12:e007090. PubMed PMC
Yavin HD, Higuchi K, Sroubek J, Younis A, Zilberman I, Anter E. Pulsed-field ablation in ventricular myocardium using a focal catheter: the impact of application repetition on lesion dimensions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2021;14:e010375. PubMed
Im SI, Higuchi S, Lee A, Stillson C, Buck E, Morrow B et al. Pulsed field ablation of left ventricular myocardium in a swine infarct model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022;8:722–31. PubMed
Younis A, Buck E, Santangeli P, Tabaja C, Garrott K, Lehn L et al. Efficacy of pulsed field vs radiofrequency for the reablation of chronic radiofrequency ablation substrate: redo pulsed field ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024;10:222–34. PubMed
Sandhu U, Alkukhun L, Kheiri B, Hodovan J, Chiang K, Splanger T et al. In vivo pulsed-field ablation in healthy vs. chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium: biophysical and histologic characterization. Europace 2023;25:1503–9. PubMed PMC
Nakagawa H, Castellvi Q, Neal R, Girouard S, Laughner J, Ikeda A et al. Effects of contact force on lesion size during pulsed field catheter ablation: histochemical characterization of ventricular lesion boundaries. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2024;17:e012026. PubMed
Peichl P, Bulava A, Wichterle D, Schlosser F, Stojadinović P, Borišincová E et al. Efficacy and safety of focal pulsed-field ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: two-centre experience. Europace 2024;26:euae192. PubMed PMC
Stojadinović P, Wichterle D, Peichl P, Nakagawa H, Čihák R, Hašková J et al. Autonomic changes are more durable after radiofrequency than pulsed electric field pulmonary vein ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022;8:895–904. PubMed
Ekanem E, Neuzil P, Reichlin T, Kautzner J, van der Voort P, Jais P et al. Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study. Nat Med 2024;30:2020–9. PubMed PMC
Reddy VY, Petru J, Funasako M, Kopriva K, Hala P, Chovanec M et al. Coronary arterial spasm during pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2022;146:1808–19. PubMed
Higuchi S, Im SI, Stillson C, Buck ED, Jerrell S, Schneider CW et al. Effect of epicardial pulsed field ablation directly on coronary arteries. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022;8:1486–96. PubMed
Gökoğlan Y, Mohanty S, Gianni C, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Güneş MF et al. Scar homogenization versus limited-substrate ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1990–8. PubMed
Tzou WS, Frankel DS, Hegeman T, Supple GE, Garcia FC, Santangeli P et al. Core isolation of critical arrhythmia elements for treatment of multiple scar-based ventricular tachycardias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015;8:353–61. PubMed
Krisai P, Knecht S, Badertscher P, Mühl A, Osswald S, Roten L et al. Troponin release after pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation compared to radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm 2022;19:1471–2. PubMed
Popa MA, Bahlke F, Kottmaier M, Foerschner L, Bourier F, Lengauer S et al. Myocardial injury and inflammation following pulsed-field ablation and very high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024;35:317–27. PubMed