Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
38760584
PubMed Central
PMC11333282
DOI
10.1038/s41591-024-03022-6
PII: 10.1038/s41591-024-03022-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation * surgery therapy MeSH
- Single-Blind Method MeSH
- Catheter Ablation * methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are suboptimal due, in part, to challenges in achieving durable lesions. Although focal point-by-point ablation allows for the creation of any required lesion set, this strategy necessitates the generation of contiguous lesions without gaps. A large-tip catheter, capable of creating wide-footprint ablation lesions, may increase ablation effectiveness and efficiency. In a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 420 patients with persistent AF underwent ablation using a large-tip catheter with dual pulsed field and radiofrequency energies versus ablation using a conventional radiofrequency ablation system. The primary composite effectiveness endpoint was evaluated through 1 year and included freedom from acute procedural failure and repeat ablation at any time, plus arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation or escalation or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from a composite of serious procedure-related or device-related adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint was observed for 73.8% and 65.8% of patients in the investigational and control arms, respectively (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). Major procedural or device-related complications occurred in three patients in the investigational arm and in two patients in the control arm (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). In a secondary analysis, procedural times were shorter in the investigational arm as compared to the control arm (P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate non-inferior safety and effectiveness of the dual-energy catheter for the treatment of persistent AF. Future large-scale studies are needed to gather real-world evidence on the impact of the focal dual-energy lattice catheter on the broader population of patients with AF. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05120193 .
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention Division of Cardiology University of Tor Vergata Rome Italy
Division of Cardiology Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
Florida Cardiology Orlando FL USA
HCA Florida Miami Miami FL USA
Helmsley Electrophysiology Center Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital New York NY USA
Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA
Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czechia
NCH Rooney Heart Institute Naples FL USA
Northwell New Hyde Park NY USA
Riverside Methodist Hospital Upper Arlington OH USA
Shamir Medical Center Be'er Ya'Akov Israel
St Bernards Medical Center and Arrhythmia Research Group Jonesboro AR USA
See more in PubMed
Hindricks, G. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J.42, 373–498 (2021). PubMed
Joglar, J. A. et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation149, e1–e156 (2024). PubMed PMC
Haissaguerre, M. et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N. Engl. J. Med.339, 659–666 (1998). PubMed
Mansour, M. et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force-sensing catheter: the prospective multicenter PRECEPT trial. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.6, 958–969 (2020). PubMed
Verma, A. et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med.372, 1812–1822 (2015). PubMed
Verma, A. & Macle, L. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: where do we go from here? Can. J. Cardiol.34, 1471–1481 (2018). PubMed
de Groot, N. M. et al. Electropathological substrate of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease: epicardial breakthrough. Circulation122, 1674–1682 (2010). PubMed
Terricabras, M., Piccini, J. P. & Verma, A. Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: challenges and solutions. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.31, 1809–1821 (2020). PubMed
Muller, J. et al. Recurrent atrial fibrillation ablation after initial successful pulmonary vein isolation. J. Clin. Med.12, 7177 (2023). PubMed PMC
Das, M. et al. Pulmonary vein re-isolation as a routine strategy regardless of symptoms: the PRESSURE randomized controlled trial. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.3, 602–611 (2017). PubMed
Calkins, H. et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm14, e275–e444 (2017). PubMed PMC
Kotnik, T., Rems, L., Tarek, M. & Miklavcic, D. Membrane electroporation and electropermeabilization: mechanisms and models. Annu. Rev. Biophys.48, 63–91 (2019). PubMed
Batista Napotnik, T., Polajžer, T. & Miklavčič, D. Cell death due to electroporation—a review. Bioelectrochemistry141, 107871 (2021). PubMed
Neven, K. et al. Acute and long-term effects of full-power electroporation ablation directly on the porcine esophagus. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.10, e004672 (2017). PubMed
Koruth, J. S. et al. Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation: esophageal injury in a novel porcine model. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.13, e008303 (2020). PubMed PMC
Cochet, H. et al. Pulsed field ablation selectively spares the oesophagus during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace23, 1391–1399 (2021). PubMed PMC
Yavin, H. et al. Pulsed field ablation using a lattice electrode for focal energy delivery: biophysical characterization, lesion durability, and safety evaluation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.13, e008580 (2020). PubMed PMC
Barkagan, M. et al. Expandable lattice electrode ablation catheter: a novel radiofrequency platform allowing high current at low density for rapid, titratable, and durable lesions. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.12, e007090 (2019). PubMed PMC
Shapira-Daniels, A. et al. Novel irrigated temperature-controlled lattice ablation catheter for ventricular ablation: a preclinical multimodality biophysical characterization. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.12, e007661 (2019). PubMed PMC
Anter, E. et al. A lattice-tip temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation catheter for wide thermal lesions: first-in-human experience with atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.6, 507–519 (2020). PubMed
Anter, E. N. P. et al. An expandable lattice electrode catheter for rapid and titratable temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation: a first-in-human multicenter trial. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. (in the press).
Reddy, V. Y. et al. A lattice-tip temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation catheter: durability of pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesion block. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.6, 623–635 (2020). PubMed
Reddy, V. Y. et al. A focal ablation catheter toggling between radiofrequency and pulsed field energy to treat atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.9, 1786–1801 (2023). PubMed
Boveda, S. et al. Single-procedure outcomes and quality-of-life improvement 12 months post-cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.4, 1440–1447 (2018). PubMed
Su, W. W. et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter STOP Persistent AF trial. Heart Rhythm17, 1841–1847 (2020). PubMed
Verma, A. et al. Pulsed field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: PULSED AF pivotal trial. Circulation147, 1422–1432 (2023). PubMed PMC
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED). THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF Bi-Directional Navigation Catheter. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf3/P030031S100B.pdf
Gaita, F. et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation122, 1667–1673 (2010). PubMed
Kimura, T. et al. Asymptomatic cerebral infarction during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparing uninterrupted rivaroxaban and warfarin (ASCERTAIN). JACC Clin. Electrophysiol.4, 1598–1609 (2018). PubMed
Herrera Siklódy, C. et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.58, 681–688 (2011). PubMed
Neumann, T. et al. MEDAFI-Trial (micro-embolization during ablation of atrial fibrillation): comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon technique vs. radiofrequency energy. Europace13, 37–44 (2011). PubMed
Halbfass, P. et al. Safety of very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: a two-centre report with emphasis on silent oesophageal injury. Europace24, 400–405 (2022). PubMed
Gaita, F. et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.22, 961–968 (2011). PubMed
Miyazaki, S. et al. Silent cerebral events/lesions after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: how can we reduce the risk of silent strokes? Heart Rhythm16, 41–48 (2019). PubMed
Reddy, V. Y. et al. Lattice-tip focal ablation catheter that toggles between radiofrequency and pulsed field energy to treat atrial fibrillation: a first-in-human trial. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.13, e008718 (2020). PubMed
Haines, D. E. Can an expanding lattice electrode catheter expand our success in catheter ablation? Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.12, e007306 (2019). PubMed
Reddy, V. Y. et al. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med.389, 1660–1671 (2023). PubMed
Ohlrogge, A. H., Brederecke, J. & Schnabel, R. B. Global burden of atrial fibrillation and flutter by national income: results from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 database. J. Am. Heart Assoc.12, e030438 (2023). PubMed PMC
Dixit, S. et al. Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: RASTA study. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol.5, 287–294 (2012). PubMed
Kistler, P. M. et al. Effect of catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation with vs without posterior left atrial wall isolation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the CAPLA randomized clinical trial. JAMA329, 127–135 (2023). PubMed PMC
Chinitz, L. A. et al. Safety and efficiency of porous-tip contact-force catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the SMART SF trial. Europace20, f392–f400 (2018). PubMed
Dorian, P. et al. Interpreting changes in quality of life in atrial fibrillation: how much change is meaningful? Am. Heart J.166, 381–387.e8 (2013). PubMed
Holmes, D. N. et al. Defining clinically important difference in the atrial fibrillation effect on quality-of-life score. Circ. Cardiovasc Qual. Outcomes12, e005358 (2019). PubMed
Pezawas, T., Ristl, R., Schukro, C. & Schmidinger, H. Health-related quality of life changes in patients undergoing repeated catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Clin. Res. Cardiol.105, 1–9 (2016). PubMed
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Lu, J. F. & Sherbourne, C. D. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med. Care32, 40–66 (1994). PubMed
Hurst, N. P., Ruta, D. A. & Kind, P. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br. J. Rheumatol.37, 862–869 (1998). PubMed
Der-Martirosian, C., Cordasco, K. M. & Washington, D. L. Health-related quality of life and comorbidity among older women veterans in the United States. Qual. Life Res.22, 2749–2756 (2013). PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05120193