BACKGROUND: There is no international consensus on an optimal ultrasound score for monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on patient-level yet. Our aim was to reassess the US7 score for the identification of the most frequently pathologic and responsive joint/tendon regions, to optimize it and contribute to an international consensus. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of disease duration on the performance of the score. METHODS: RA patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of starting/changing DMARD therapy by the US7 score in greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD). The frequency of pathologic joint/tendon regions and their responsiveness to therapy were analyzed by Friedman test and Cochrane-Q test respectively, including the comparison of palmar vs. dorsal regions (chi-square test). The responsiveness of different reduced scores and the amount of information retained from the original US7 score were assessed by standardized response means (SRM)/linear regression. Analyses were also performed separately for early and established RA. RESULTS: A total of 435 patients (N = 138 early RA) were included (56.5 (SD 13.1) years old, 8.2 (9.1) years disease duration, 80% female). The dorsal wrist, palmar MCP2, extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendons were most frequently affected by GS/PD synovitis/tenosynovitis (wrist: 45%/43%; MCP2: 35%/28%; EDC: 30%/11% and ECU: 25%/11%) and significantly changed within 6 months of therapy (all p ≤0.003 by GS/PD). The dorsal vs. palmar side of the wrist by GS/PD (p < 0.001) and the palmar side of the finger joints by PD (p < 0.001) were more frequently pathologic. The reduced US7 score (GS/PD: palmar MCP2, dorsal wrist, EDC and ECU, only PD: dorsal MCP2) showed therapy response (SRM 0.433) after 6 months and retained 76% of the full US7 score's information. No major differences between the groups of early and established RA could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: The wrist, MCP2, EDC, and ECU tendons were most frequently pathologic and responsive to therapy in both early and established RA and should therefore be included in a comprehensive score for monitoring RA patients on patient-level.

Biostatistics Tubingen Tubingen Germany

Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway

Department of Endocrinology Nephrology Rheumatology Division Rheumatology Universitätsklinikum Leipzig Leipzig Germany

Department of Internal Medicine Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Park Klinik Weißensee Berlin Germany

Department of Rheumatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

Department of Rheumatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

Department of Rheumatology MC Groep Hospitals Lelystad Netherlands

Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands

See more in PubMed

Smolen JS, et al. Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1020–1030. doi: 10.1002/art.20982. PubMed DOI

Breedveld FC, et al. The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):26–37. doi: 10.1002/art.21519. PubMed DOI

van der Heijde D, et al. Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(4):1063–1074. doi: 10.1002/art.21655. PubMed DOI

Szkudlarek M, et al. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2103–2112. doi: 10.1002/art.20333. PubMed DOI

Scheel AK, et al. Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(5):595–600. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.041814. PubMed DOI PMC

Backhaus M, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(6):1232–1245. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1232::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO;2-3. PubMed DOI

Backhaus M, et al. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(10):895–904. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.895. PubMed DOI PMC

Schmidt WA, et al. Low-field MRI versus ultrasound: which is more sensitive in detecting inflammation and bone damage in MCP and MTP joints in mild or moderate rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(1):91–96. PubMed

Colebatch AN, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):804–814. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158. PubMed DOI

Wakefield RJ, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(12):2485–2487. PubMed

Bruyn GA, et al. Ultrasound definition of tendon damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a OMERACT consensus-based ultrasound score focussing on the diagnostic reliability. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(11):1929–1934. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203596. PubMed DOI

Naredo E, et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(8):1328–1334. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092. PubMed DOI

Bruyn GA, et al. OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group. OMERACT Definitions for Ultrasonographic Pathologies and Elementary Lesions of Rheumatic Disorders 15 Years On. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(10):1388–93. 10.3899/jrheum.181095. PubMed

Backhaus M, et al. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(7):641–649. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.7.641. PubMed DOI PMC

Möller I, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):1974–79. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585. PubMed

Terslev L, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints of a standardised consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open. 2017;3(1):e000427. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000427. PubMed DOI PMC

D'Agostino MA, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 1: definition and development of a standardised, consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open. 2017;3(1):e000428. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000428. PubMed DOI PMC

Naredo E, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of extended versus reduced joint evaluation. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(6):881–884. PubMed

Backhaus M, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(9):1194–1201. doi: 10.1002/art.24646. PubMed DOI

Perricone C, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51(5):866–873. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker405. PubMed DOI

Aga AB, et al. Development of a feasible and responsive ultrasound inflammation score for rheumatoid arthritis through a data-driven approach. RMD Open. 2016;2(2):e000325. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000325. PubMed DOI PMC

Aydin SZ, et al. Six-joint ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: a feasible approach for implementing ultrasound in remission. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(5):853–856. PubMed

Hartung W, et al. Development and evaluation of a novel ultrasound score for large joints in rheumatoid arthritis: one year of experience in daily clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(5):675–682. doi: 10.1002/acr.21574. PubMed DOI

Luz KR, et al. A new musculoskeletal ultrasound scoring system (US10) of the hands and wrist joints for evaluation of early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2016;56(5):421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2016.03.007. PubMed DOI

Rosa J, et al. Does a simplified 6-joint ultrasound index correlate well enough with the 28-joint disease activity score to be used in clinical practice? J Clin Rheumatol. 2016;22(4):179–183. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000415. PubMed DOI

D'Agostino MA, et al. Exploring a new ultrasound score as a clinical predictive tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting abatacept: results from the APPRAISE study. RMD Open. 2016;2(1):e000237. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000237. PubMed DOI PMC

Backhaus TM, et al. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1163–1169. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201397. PubMed DOI PMC

Ohrndorf S, et al. Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(8):1238–1243. PubMed

Aga AB, et al. First step in the development of an ultrasound joint inflammation score for rheumatoid arthritis using a data-driven approach. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(8):1444–1451. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207572. PubMed DOI

Naredo E, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):515–522. doi: 10.1002/art.23529. PubMed DOI

Arnett FC, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–324. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302. PubMed DOI

Scheel AK, et al. A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(3):733–743. doi: 10.1002/art.20939. PubMed DOI

Grassi W, Filippucci E. Ultrasonography and the rheumatologist. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19(1):55–60. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3280119648. PubMed DOI

Padovano I, et al. Prevalence of ultrasound synovial inflammatory findings in healthy subjects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(10):1819–1823. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208103. PubMed DOI

Hiraga M, et al. Sonographic measurements of low-echoic synovial area in the dorsal aspect of metatarsophalangeal joints in healthy subjects. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(3):386–392. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.970740. PubMed DOI

Ammitzboll-Danielsen M, et al. Validity and sensitivity to change of the semi-quantitative OMERACT ultrasound scoring system for tenosynovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55(12):2156–2166. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew317. PubMed DOI

Cohen J, editor. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates. xxi; 1988. p. 567.

Vlad V, et al. Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: volar versus dorsal synovitis evaluation and scoring. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-124. PubMed DOI PMC

McQueen F, et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Summary of OMERACT 6 MR Imaging Module. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(6):1387–1392. PubMed

Dakkak YJ, et al. Evidence for the presence of synovial sheaths surrounding the extensor tendons at the metacarpophalangeal joints: a microscopy study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;24(1):154. 10.1186/s13075-022-02841-7. PubMed PMC

Yoshimi R, et al. A novel 8-joint ultrasound score is useful in daily practice for rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(3):379–385. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.974305. PubMed DOI