The relationship between competition and productivity in plant communities is unclear, and this is likely to be due to (1) a confusion in the literature between productivity and biomass, (2) the lack of studies assessing variation in competition in all combinations of biomass and productivity. We assessed the outcome of plant-plant interactions by removing the neighbors around five focal species in 14 herbaceous communities with contrasting biomasses and productivities: meadows with high biomass and productivity, heathlands with high biomass and low productivity, understory communities of deciduous forests with low biomass and high productivity and calcareous grasslands with low biomass and low productivity. Competition intensity was quantified with the relative interaction index (RII) calculated for both survival and growth of the transplanted targets assessed with the increase in leaf number. To examine which traits better explain variation in competition and what drives variation in diversity, we also quantified litter decomposition rate, species composition and diversity and six morphological traits related to plant size and growth rate for eight dominant species of each community. Our main questions were: (1) Is competition mostly related to biomass or productivity? (2) Which traits of the community dominants better explain variation in competition? (3) Is variation in competition and related traits correlated with variation in diversity? Competition for survival significantly increased with increasing community biomass (but not productivity). In addition, competition for survival increased with the size traits and competitive effects of the dominant species of the communities, whereas diversity decreased. Competition for growth also increased with increasing productivity, but only for high-biomass communities. Additionally, the increase in competition for growth with increasing soil fertility, as measured with litter decomposition rate, was only due to an increase in target growth in plots without neighbors and was unrelated to community competitive effects and species diversity. The results of our study illustrate how the confusion between productivity and biomass could have contributed to the long-standing debate on variation in competition along productivity gradients and its consequence for diversity.

Botany Department State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany

Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Třeboň Czech Republic

Plant Ecology Group University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany

UMR Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux Bordeaux INP Pessac France

UMR Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux University of Bordeaux Pessac Cedex France

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aarssen, L., and W. T. Keogh. 2002. “Conundrums of Competitive Ability in Plants: What to Measure?” Oikos 96: 531-42.

Ackerly, D. D. 2005. “Functional Strategies of Chaparral Shrubs in Relation to Seasonal Water Deficit and Disturbance.” Ecological Monographs 74: 25-44.

Adler, P. B., E. W. Seabloom, E. T. Borer, H. Hillebrand, Y. Hautier, A. Hector, W. S. Harpole, et al. 2011. “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness.” Science 333: 1750-3.

Al-Mufti, M. M., C. L. Sydes, S. B. Furness, J. P. Grime, and S. R. Band. 1977. “A Quantitative Analysis of Shoot Phenology and Dominance in Herbaceous Vegetation.” Journal of Ecology 65: 759-91.

Armas, C., R. Ordiales, and F. I. Pugnaire. 2004. “Measuring Plant Interactions: A New Comparative Index.” Ecology 85: 2682-6.

Cahill, J. F. 2003. “Lack of Relationship between below-Ground Competition and Allocation to Roots in 10 Grassland Species.” Journal of Ecology 91: 532-40.

Coomes, D. A., G. Kunstler, C. D. Canham, and E. Wright. 2009. “A Greater Range of Shade-Tolerance Niches in Nutrient-Rich Forests: An Explanation for Positive Richness-Productivity Relationships?” Journal of Ecology 97: 705-17.

Cornelissen, J. H. C., S. Lavorel, E. Garnier, S. Diaz, N. Buchmann, D. E. Gurvich, et al. 2003. “A Handbook of Protocols for Standardised and Easy Measurement of Plant Functional Traits Worldwide.” Australian Journal of Botany 51: 335-80.

Cornwell, W. K., J. H. C. Cornelissen, K. Amatangelo, E. Dorrepaal, V. T. Eviner, O. Godoy, S. E. Hobbie, et al. 2008. “Plant Species Traits Are the Predominant Control on Litter Decomposition Rates within Biomes Worldwide.” Ecology Letters 11: 1065-71.

Delerue, F., M. Gonzalez, D. L. Achat, L. Puzos, and L. Augusto. 2018. “Competition along Productivity Gradients: News from Heathlands.” Oecologia 187: 219-31.

Díaz, S., J. Kattge, J. H. C. Cornelissen, I. J. Wright, S. Lavorel, S. Dray, B. Reu, et al. 2016. “The Global Spectrum of Plant Form and Function.” Nature 529: 167-71.

Forey, E., B. Chapelet, Y. Vitasse, M. Tilquin, B. Touzard, and R. Michalet. 2008. “The Relative Importance of Disturbance and Environmental Stress at Local and Regional Scales in French Coastal Sand Dunes.” Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 493-502.

Fraser, L. H., J. Pither, A. Jentsch, M. Sternberg, M. Zobel, D. Askarizadeh, S. Bartha, et al. 2015. “Worldwide Evidence of a Unimodal Relationship between Productivity and Plant Species Richness.” Science 349: 302-5.

Garnier, E., J. Cortez, G. Billes, M. L. Navas, C. Roumet, M. Debussche, et al. 2004. “Plant Functional Markers Capture Ecosystem Properties during Secondary Succession.” Ecology 85: 2630-7.

Gaudet, C., and P. A. Keddy. 1988. “Comparative Approach to Predicting Competitive Ability from Plant Traits.” Nature 334: 242-3.

Goldberg, D. E. 1990. “Components of Resource Competition in Plant Communities.” In Perspectives in Plant Competition, edited by J. B. Grace and D. Tilman, 357-64. San Diego: Academic Press.

Gonzalez, M., L. Augusto, A. Gallet-Budynek, J. M. Xue, N. Yauschew-Raguenes, D. Guyon, et al. 2013. “Contribution of Understory Species to Total Ecosystem Aboveground and Belowground Biomass in Temperate Pinus pinaster Ait. Forests.” Forest Ecology & Management 289: 38-47.

Grace, J. B., T. M. Anderson, E. W. Seabloom, E. T. Borer, P. B. Adler, W. S. Harpole, Y. Hautier, et al. 2016. “Integrative Modelling Reveals Mechanisms Linking Productivity and Plant Species Richness.” Nature 529: 390-3.

Grace, M. 1991. “A Clarification of the Debate between Grime and Tilman.” Functional Ecology 5: 583-9.

Grime, J. P. 1973. “Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation.” Nature 242: 344-7.

Joswig, J. S., C. Wirth, M. C. Schuman, J. Kattge, B. Reu, I. J. Wright, S. D. Sippel, et al. 2022. “Climatic and Soil Factors Explain the Two-Dimensional Spectrum of Global Plant Trait Variation.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 36-50.

Kadmon, R. 1995. “Plant Competition along Soil Moisture Gradients: A Field Experiment with the Desert Annual Stipa capensis.” Journal of Ecology 83: 253-62.

Kunstler, G., D. Falster, D. A. Coomes, F. Hui, R. M. Kooyman, D. C. Laughlin, L. Poorter, et al. 2016. “Plant Functional Traits Have Globally Consistent Effects on Competition.” Nature 529: 204-7.

Lamb, E. G., and J. F. Cahill. 2008. “When Competition Does Not Matter: Grassland Diversity and Community Composition.” American Naturalist 171: 777-87.

Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsonn, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, et al. 2001. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.” Science 294: 804-8.

Maalouf, J. P., Y. Le Bagousse-Pinguet, L. Marchand, E. Bachelier, B. Touzard, and R. Michalet. 2012. “Integrating Climate Change into Calcareous Grassland Management.” Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 795-802.

McArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Michalet, R. 2001. Facteurs abiotiques et traits biologiques déterminant les interactions biotiques, la répartition des populations dominantes et la structuration des communautés terrestres: Application à quelques écosystèmes de l'Arc Alpin. Habilitation Thesis. Grenoble: University of Grenoble.

Michalet, R., F. Delerue, and P. Liancourt. 2022. “Disentangling the Effects of Biomass and Productivity in Plant Competition.” Dryad, Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sj3tx967p.

Michalet, R., F. Delerue, P. Liancourt, and F. I. Pugnaire. 2021. “Are Complementarity Effects of Species Richness on Productivity the Strongest in Species-Rich Communities?” Journal of Ecology 109: 2038-46.

Michalet, R., C. Gandoy, D. Joud, J. P. Pagès, and P. Choler. 2002. “Plant Community Composition and Biomass on Calcareous and Siliceous Substrates in the Northern French Alps: Comparative Effects of Soil Chemistry and Water Status.” Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 34: 102-13.

Michalet, R., C. Schöb, C. J. Lortie, R. W. Brooker, and R. M. Callaway. 2014. “Partitioning Net Interactions among Plants along Altitudinal Gradients to Study Community Responses to Climate Change.” Functional Ecology 28: 75-86.

Mittelbach, G. G., C. F. Steiner, S. M. Scheiner, K. L. Gross, H. L. Reynolds, R. B. Waide, M. R. Willig, S. I. Dodson, and L. Gough. 2001. “What Is the Observed Relationship between Species Richness and Productivity?” Ecology 82: 2381-96.

Odum, E. P. 1969. “The Strategy of Ecosystem Development.” Science 164: 262-70.

Proença, B., T. Nez, A. Poli, A. Ciutat, L. Devaux, A. Sottolichio, X. Montaudouin, and R. Michalet. 2019. “Intraspecific Facilitation Explains the Spread of the Invasive Engineer Spartina anglica in Atlantic Salt Marshes.” Journal of Vegetation Science 30: 212-23.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rajaniemi, T. K. 2002. “Why Does Fertilization Reduce Plant Species Diversity? Testing Three Competition-Based Hypotheses.” Journal of Ecology 90: 316-24.

Rees, M. 2013. “Competition on Productivity Gradients - What Do we Expect?” Ecology Letters 16: 291-8.

Reich, P. B., M. B. Walters, and D. S. Ellsworth. 1997. “From Tropics to Tundra: Global Convergence in Plant Functioning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 13730-4.

Sauter, F., H. Albrecht, J. Kollmann, and M. Lang. 2021. “Competition Components along Productivity Gradients - Revisiting a Classic Dispute in Ecology.” Oikos 130: 1326-34.

Tilman, D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tilman, D. 1990. “Constraints and Tradeoffs - toward a Predictive Theory of Competition and Succession.” Ecology 58: 3-15.

Vile, D., B. Shipley, and E. Garnier. 2006. “Ecosystem Productivity Can Be Predicted from Potential Relative Growth Rate and Species Abundance.” Ecology Letters 9: 1061-7.

Wang, X., M. Gossart, Y. Guinet, H. Fau, C. D. Lavignasse-Scaglia, G. Chaieb, and R. Michalet. 2020. “The Consistency of Home-Field Advantage Effects with Varying Climate Conditions.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 149: 107934.

Wang, Y. F., M. W. Cadotte, Y. X. Chen, L. H. Fraser, Y. H. Zhang, F. M. Huang, S. Luo, N. Shi, and M. Loreau. 2019. “Global Evidence of Positive Biodiversity Effects on Spatial Ecosystem Stability in Natural Grasslands.” Nature Communications 10: 3207.

Wardle, D. A., O. Zackrisson, G. Hornberg, and C. Gallet. 1997. “The Influence of Island Area on Ecosystem Properties.” Science 277: 1296-9.

Waring, R. H., and J. F. Franklin. 1979. “Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest.” Science 204: 1380-6.

Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, M. Westoby, D. D. Ackerly, Z. Baruch, F. Bongers, J. Cavender-Bares, et al. 2004. “The Worldwide Leaf Economics Spectrum.” Nature 428: 821-7.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dryad
10.5061/dryad.sj3tx967p