Cultured Meat on the Social Network Twitter: Clean, Future and Sustainable Meats

. 2022 Sep 03 ; 11 (17) : . [epub] 20220903

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36076879

Grantová podpora
2020B0004 Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences

The rapid development of technologies for cultured meat production has led to new challenges for producers regarding appropriate communication with future customers in order to deliver products to a viable market. Communication analysis of social media enables the identification of the key characteristics of the monitored topic, as well as the main areas of communication by individual users based on active digital footprints. This study aimed to identify the key characteristics of cultured meat based on communication analysis of the social network Twitter. Communication analysis was performed based on 36,356 Tweets posted by 4128 individual users. This analysis identified the following main communicated characteristics: clean meat, future meat, and sustainable meat. Latent Dittrich allocation identified five communication topics: (1) clean and sustainable products, (2) comparisons with plant-based protein and the impact on agribusiness, (3) positive environmental aspects, (4) cultured meat as an alternative protein, and (5) the regulation of cultured meat.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Delaney M., McCarthy M.B. Saints, Sinners and Non-Believers: The Moral Space of Food. A Qualitative Exploration of Beliefs and Perspectives on Healthy Eating of Irish Adults Aged 50–70. Appetite. 2014;73:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.017. PubMed DOI

De Jans S., Spielvogel I., Naderer B., Hudders L. Digital Food Marketing to Children: How an Influencer’s Lifestyle Can Stimulate Healthy Food Choices among Children. Appetite. 2021;162:105182. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105182. PubMed DOI

Santaoja M., Jallinoja P. Food out of Its Usual Rut. Carnivalesque Online Veganism as Political Consumerism. Geoforum. 2021;126:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.029. DOI

North M., Kothe E., Klas A., Ling M. How to Define “Vegan”: An Exploratory Study of Definition Preferences among Omnivores, Vegetarians, and Vegans. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021;93:104246. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104246. DOI

Pilař L., Kvasničková Stanislavská L., Kvasnička R. Healthy Food on the Twitter Social Network: Vegan, Homemade, and Organic Food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073815. PubMed DOI PMC

Allès B., Baudry J., Méjean C., Touvier M., Péneau S., Hercberg S., Kesse-Guyot E. Comparison of Sociodemographic and Nutritional Characteristics between Self-Reported Vegetarians, Vegans, and Meat-Eaters from the NutriNet-Santé Study. Nutrients. 2017;9:1023. doi: 10.3390/nu9091023. PubMed DOI PMC

Chan H.-L., Wei X., Guo S., Leung W.-H. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Fashion Supply Chains: A Multi-Methodological Study. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020;142:102063. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102063. DOI

Scanes C.G. Animals and Human Society. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2018. Impact of Agricultural Animals on the Environment; pp. 427–449.

Gomiero T. Environmental Impact of Agro-Food Industry and Food Consumption. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. Organic agriculture: Impact on the environment and food quality; pp. 31–58.

Lin M., Liu X., Xu Q., Song H., Li P., Yao J. Aroma-Active Components of Yeast Extract Pastes with a Basic and Characteristic Meaty Flavour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014;94:882–889. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6330. PubMed DOI

Van der Weele C., Feindt P., Jan van der Goot A., van Mierlo B., van Boekel M. Meat Alternatives: An Integrative Comparison. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;88:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018. DOI

Post M.J., Levenberg S., Kaplan D.L., Genovese N., Fu J., Bryant C.J., Negowetti N., Verzijden K., Moutsatsou P. Scientific, Sustainability and Regulatory Challenges of Cultured Meat. Nat. Food. 2020;1:403–415. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z. DOI

Bierbaum R., Leonard S.A., Rejeski D., Whaley C., Barra R.O., Libre C. Novel Entities and Technologies: Environmental Benefits and Risks. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2020;105:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.002. DOI

Nobre F.S. Cultured Meat and the Sustainable Development Goals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022;124:140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.011. DOI

Tuomisto H.L., Teixeira de Mattos M.J. Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:6117–6123. doi: 10.1021/es200130u. PubMed DOI

Reis G.G., Heidemann M.S., Borini F.M., Molento C.F.M. Livestock Value Chain in Transition: Cultivated (Cell-Based) Meat and the Need for Breakthrough Capabilities. Technol. Soc. 2020;62:101286. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101286. DOI

Chen L., Guttieres D., Koenigsberg A., Barone P.W., Sinskey A.J., Springs S.L. Large-Scale Cultured Meat Production: Trends, Challenges and Promising Biomanufacturing Technologies. Biomaterials. 2022;280:121274. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121274. PubMed DOI

Tomiyama A.J., Kawecki N.S., Rosenfeld D.L., Jay J.A., Rajagopal D., Rowat A.C. Bridging the Gap between the Science of Cultured Meat and Public Perceptions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020;104:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.019. DOI

Pilař L., Kvasničková Stanislavská L., Pitrová J., Krejčí I., Tichá I., Chalupová M. Twitter Analysis of Global Communication in the Field of Sustainability. Sustainability. 2019;11:6958. doi: 10.3390/su11246958. DOI

Reis G.G., Heidemann M.S., de Matos K.H.O., Molento C.F.M. Cell-Based Meat and Firms’ Environmental Strategies: New Rationales as per Available Literature. Sustainability. 2020;12:9418. doi: 10.3390/su12229418. DOI

Lähteenmäki-Uutela A., Rahikainen M., Lonkila A., Yang B. Alternative Proteins and EU Food Law. Food Control. 2021;130:108336. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108336. DOI

Bodiou V., Moutsatsou P., Post M.J. Microcarriers for Upscaling Cultured Meat Production. Front. Nutr. 2020;7:10. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00010. PubMed DOI PMC

Godfray H.C.J., Aveyard P., Garnett T., Hall J.W., Key T.J., Lorimer J., Pierrehumbert R.T., Scarborough P., Springmann M., Jebb S.A. Meat Consumption, Health, and the Environment. Science. 2018;361:eaam5324. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324. PubMed DOI

Kang D.-H., Louis F., Liu H., Shimoda H., Nishiyama Y., Nozawa H., Kakitani M., Takagi D., Kasa D., Nagamori E., et al. Engineered Whole Cut Meat-like Tissue by the Assembly of Cell Fibers Using Tendon-Gel Integrated Bioprinting. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5059. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25236-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Stephens N., Di Silvio L., Dunsford I., Ellis M., Glencross A., Sexton A. Bringing Cultured Meat to Market: Technical, Socio-Political, and Regulatory Challenges in Cellular Agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;78:155–166. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010. PubMed DOI PMC

Ianovici I., Zagury Y., Redenski I., Lavon N., Levenberg S. 3D-Printable Plant Protein-Enriched Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Development. Biomaterials. 2022;284:121487. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121487. PubMed DOI

Baum C.M., Bröring S., Lagerkvist C.-J. Information, Attitudes, and Consumer Evaluations of Cultivated Meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021;92:104226. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104226. DOI

Santo R.E., Kim B.F., Goldman S.E., Dutkiewicz J., Biehl E.M.B., Bloem M.W., Neff R.A., Nachman K.E. Considering Plant-Based Meat Substitutes and Cell-Based Meats: A Public Health and Food Systems Perspective. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020;4:134. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00134. DOI

De Paula Soares Valente J., Fiedler R.A., Sucha Heidemann M., Molento C.F.M. First Glimpse on Attitudes of Highly Educated Consumers towards Cell-Based Meat and Related Issues in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221129. PubMed DOI PMC

Askew K. What Do Flexitarian Consumers Want? Plant-Based Innovation Opportunities Revealed. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2021/11/16/What-do-flexitarian-consumers-want-Plant-based-innovation-opportunities-revealed.

Poinski M. Eat Just Lands First Regulatory Approval for Cell-Based Meat. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.fooddive.com/news/eat-just-lands-first-regulatory-approval-for-cell-based-meat/589907/

Dent M. Plant-Based Meat: An Outlook For 2020. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.idtechex.com/fr/research-article/plant-based-meat-an-outlook-for-2020/19234.

Siegrist M., Sütterlin B., Hartmann C. Perceived Naturalness and Evoked Disgust Influence Acceptance of Cultured Meat. Meat Sci. 2018;139:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.007. PubMed DOI

Van Loo E.J., Caputo V., Lusk J.L. Consumer Preferences for Farm-Raised Meat, Lab-Grown Meat, and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Does Information or Brand Matter? Food Policy. 2020;95:101931. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101931. DOI

Bryant C., Sanctorum H. Alternative Proteins, Evolving Attitudes: Comparing Consumer Attitudes to Plant-Based and Cultured Meat in Belgium in Two Consecutive Years. Appetite. 2021;161:105161. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161. PubMed DOI

Mancini M.C., Antonioli F. Exploring Consumers’ Attitude towards Cultured Meat in Italy. Meat Sci. 2019;150:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.014. PubMed DOI

Gousset C., Gregorio E., Marais B., Rusalen A., Chriki S., Hocquette J.-F., Ellies-Oury M.-P. Perception of Cultured “Meat” by French Consumers According to Their Diet. Livest. Sci. 2022;260:104909. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104909. DOI

Ritchie H., Roser M. Meat and Dairy Production. [(accessed on 29 July 2022)]. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production#citation.

Choudhury D., Singh S., Seah J.S.H., Yeo D.C.L., Tan L.P. Commercialization of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:1055–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.08.006. PubMed DOI

Chriki S., Payet V., Pflanzer S.B., Ellies-Oury M.-P., Liu J., Hocquette É., Rezende-de-Souza J.H., Hocquette J.-F. Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”. Foods. 2021;10:2588. doi: 10.3390/foods10112588. PubMed DOI PMC

Bhat Z.F., Morton J.D., Mason S.L., Bekhit A.E.A., Bhat H.F. Technological, Regulatory, and Ethical Aspects of In Vitro Meat: A Future Slaughter-Free Harvest. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019;18:1192–1208. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12473. PubMed DOI

Szejda K., Bryant C.J., Urbanovich T. US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study. Foods. 2021;10:1050. doi: 10.3390/foods10051050. PubMed DOI PMC

Hocquette J.-F. Is in Vitro Meat the Solution for the Future? Meat Sci. 2016;120:167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036. PubMed DOI

Fitch C., Hricko C., Martin R. Public Health, Immigration Reform and Food System Change. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future; Baltimore, MD, USA: 2017.

Burkholder J., Libra B., Weyer P., Heathcote S., Kolpin D., Thorne P.S., Wichman M. Impacts of Waste from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations on Water Quality. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007;115:308–312. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8839. PubMed DOI PMC

Clark M.A., Domingo N.G.G., Colgan K., Thakrar S.K., Tilman D., Lynch J., Azevedo I.L., Hill J.D. Global Food System Emissions Could Preclude Achieving the 1.5° and 2 °C Climate Change Targets. Science. 2020;370:705–708. doi: 10.1126/science.aba7357. PubMed DOI

Lynch J., Pierrehumbert R. Climate Impacts of Cultured Meat and Beef Cattle. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019;3:5. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00005. PubMed DOI PMC

Fraeye I., Kratka M., Vandenburgh H., Thorrez L. Sensorial and Nutritional Aspects of Cultured Meat in Comparison to Traditional Meat: Much to Be Inferred. Front. Nutr. 2020;7:35. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00035. PubMed DOI PMC

Shaw E., Mac Con Iomaire M. A Comparative Analysis of the Attitudes of Rural and Urban Consumers towards Cultured Meat. Br. Food J. 2019;121:1782–1800. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0433. DOI

Tubb C., Seba T. Rethinking Food and Agriculture 2020-2030: The Second Domestication of Plants and Animals, the Disruption of the Cow, and the Collapse of Industrial Livestock Farming. Ind. Biotechnol. 2021;17:57–72. doi: 10.1089/ind.2021.29240.ctu. DOI

Tucker C.A. The Significance of Sensory Appeal for Reduced Meat Consumption. Appetite. 2014;81:168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.022. PubMed DOI

Bryant C., Barnett J. Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: A Systematic Review. Meat Sci. 2018;143:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008. PubMed DOI

Dagevos H. Impact of Meat Consumption on Health and Environmental Sustainability. Information Science Reference; Hershey, PA, USA: 2016. Exploring Flexitarianism; pp. 233–243.

Harris J., Ladak A., Mathur M.B. The Effects of Exposure to Information About Animal Welfare Reforms on Animal Farming Opposition: A Randomized Experiment. Anthrozoos. 2022:1–16. doi: 10.1080/08927936.2022.2062868. DOI

Kadim I.T., Mahgoub O., Baqir S., Faye B., Purchas R. Cultured Meat from Muscle Stem Cells: A Review of Challenges and Prospects. J. Integr. Agric. 2015;14:222–233. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60881-9. DOI

Jairath G., Mal G., Gopinath D., Singh B. A Holistic Approach to Access the Viability of Cultured Meat: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;110:700–710. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.024. DOI

Kahan S., Camphuijsen J., Cannistra C., Potter G., Cosenza Z., Shmulevich I. Cultivated Meat Modeling Consortium: Inaugural Meeting Whitepaper. Authorea. 2020 doi: 10.22541/au.158057683.31004563. DOI

Djisalov M., Knežić T., Podunavac I., Živojević K., Radonic V., Knežević N.Ž., Bobrinetskiy I., Gadjanski I. Cultivating Multidisciplinarity: Manufacturing and Sensing Challenges in Cultured Meat Production. Biology. 2021;10:204. doi: 10.3390/biology10030204. PubMed DOI PMC

Thorrez L., Vandenburgh H. Challenges in the Quest for ‘Clean Meat’. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:215–216. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0043-0. PubMed DOI

Blei M.D., Ng Y.A., Jordan I.M. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003;3:993–1022.

Pilař L., Kvasničková Stanislavská L., Kvasnička R., Bouda P., Pitrová J. Framework for Social Media Analysis Based on Hashtag Research. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:3697. doi: 10.3390/app11083697. DOI

Prabhakaran S. Topic Modeling with Gensim (Python) [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.machinelearningplus.com/nlp/topic-modeling-gensim-python/

Zhao Y., Xi H., Zhang C. Exploring Occupation Differences in Reactions to COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter. Data Inf. Manag. 2021;5:110–118. doi: 10.2478/dim-2020-0032. PubMed DOI PMC

Pérez-Rodríguez G., Pérez-Pérez M., Fdez-Riverola F., Lourenço A. Mining the Sociome for Health Informatics: Analysis of Therapeutic Lifestyle Adherence of Diabetic Patients in Twitter. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020;110:214–232. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.04.025. DOI

Karami A., Clark S.B., Mackenzie A., Lee D., Zhu M., Boyajieff H.R., Goldschmidt B. 2020 U.S. Presidential Election in Swing States: Gender Differences in Twitter Conversations. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights. 2022;2:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100097. DOI

Meena P., Kumar G. Online Food Delivery Companies’ Performance and Consumers Expectations during COVID-19: An Investigation Using Machine Learning Approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022;68:103052. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103052. DOI

Chang H.-C., Iyer H. Trends in Twitter Hashtag Applications: Design Features for Value-Added Dimensions to Future Library Catalogues. Libr. Trends. 2012;61:248–258. doi: 10.1353/lib.2012.0024. DOI

Pilař L., Poláková J., Gresham G., Rojík S., Tichá I. Why people use hashtags when visiting farmers’ markets; Proceedings of the 26th International Scientific Conference on Agrarian Perspectives—Competitiveness of European Agriculture and Food Sectors, Czech University Life Sciences Praguedept Systems Eng; Prague, Czech Republic. 13–15 September 2017; pp. 287–292.

Zhang K., Geng Y., Zhao J., Liu J., Li W. Sentiment Analysis of Social Media via Multimodal Feature Fusion. Symmetry. 2020;12:2010. doi: 10.3390/sym12122010. DOI

Childers C.C., Lemon L.L., Hoy M.G. #Sponsored #Ad: Agency Perspective on Influencer Marketing Campaigns. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2019;40:258–274. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2018.1521113. DOI

De Veirman M., Cauberghe V., Hudders L. Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude. Int. J. Advert. 2017;36:798–828. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035. DOI

Pilař L., Kvasničková Stanislavská L., Poláková J., Rojík S., Kvasnička R., Gresham G. Customer Experience with Organic Food: Global View. Emirates J. Food Agric. 2018;30:918–926. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1856. DOI

Pilař L., Balcarová T., Rojík S., Tichá I., Poláková J. Customer Experience with Farmers’ Markets: What Hashtags Can Reveal. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2018;21:755–770. doi: 10.22434/IFAMR2017.0039. DOI

Kvasničková Stanislavská L., Pilař L., Margarisová K., Kvasnička R. Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media: Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries. Sustainability. 2020;12:5255. doi: 10.3390/su12135255. DOI

Pilař L., Moulis P., Pitrová J., Bouda P., Gresham G., Balcarová T., Rojík S. Education and Business as a Key Topics at the Instagram Posts in the Area of Gamification. J. Effic. Responsib. Educ. Sci. 2019;12:26–33. doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2019.120103. DOI

Twitter Twitter API v2: Early Access. [(accessed on 29 July 2022)]. Available online: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/early-access.

Edward A. An Extensive Guide to Collecting Tweets from Twitter API v2 for Academic Research Using Python 3. [(accessed on 29 July 2022)]. Available online: https://developer.twitter.com/en/products/twitter-api/academic-research.

Bastian M., HEymann S., Jacomy M. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks; Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; San Jose, CA, USA. 17–20 May 2009.

Reza HabibAgahi M., Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani M., Maghsoudi M. On the Co-Authorship Network Analysis in the Process Mining Research Community: A Social Network Analysis Perspective. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022;206:117853. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117853. DOI

Cordell B. Bruce R Cordell on Twitter: “What If You Can Have Your Meat, Be Ethical, and Environmental, Too?”. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://twitter.com/BruceCordell/status/788081549.

Harris S. Sam Harrris on Twitter “If Cultured Meat Is Molecularly Identical to Beef, Pork, Etc., and Tastes the Same, Will You Switch to Eating It?”. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/694260826820087808.

Summit G.F. Global Food Summit on Twitter. It May Not Happen at Large Scale, but a Micro-Brewery Type of System for Cultured Meat Is Plausible. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://twitter.com/GlobalFoodSumm1/status/1055205872308289536.

Choudhury D., Tseng T.W., Swartz E. The Business of Cultured Meat. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:573–577. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.02.012. PubMed DOI

Friedrich B. Why GFI Uses the Term “Cultivated Meat”. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://gfi.org/blog/cultivatedmeat/

De Oliveira Padilha L.G., Malek L., Umberger W.J. Consumers’ Attitudes towards Lab-Grown Meat, Conventionally Raised Meat and Plant-Based Protein Alternatives. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022;99:104573. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104573. DOI

Chiles R.M. If They Come, We Will Build It: In Vitro Meat and the Discursive Struggle over Future Agrofood Expectations. Agric. Human Values. 2013;30:511–523. doi: 10.1007/s10460-013-9427-9. DOI

University of Oxford Lab-Grown Meat Would “Cut Emissions and Save Energy”. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2011-06-21-lab-grown-meat-would-cut-emissions-and-save-energy.

Cohen M., Ignaszewski E., Murray S., O’Donnell M., Elliot Swartz S., Voss Z.W. 2021 State of The Industry Report—Cultivated Meat and Seafood. The Good Food Institute; Washington, DC, USA: 2021.

Kirsten H., Seib-Pfeifer L.-E., Lüth C.A., Rosenfeld D.L. Validation and Application of a German Version of the Dietarian Identity Questionnaire: Revealing Differences between Omnivores, Vegetarians, and Vegans. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020;86:103988. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103988. DOI

Bedin E., Torricelli C., Gigliano S., De Leo R., Pulvirenti A. Vegan Foods: Mimic Meat Products in the Italian Market. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2018;13:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2018.04.003. DOI

Hammett E. Veganism on the Rise: How Retailers Are Responding to the Growing Appetite for Plant-Based Food. [(accessed on 3 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.marketingweek.com/retailers-vegan-plant-based-food/

Brouwer A.R., D’Souza C., Singaraju S., Arango-Soler L.A. Value Attitude Behaviour and Social Stigma in the Adoption of Veganism: An Integrated Model. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022;97:104479. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104479. DOI

Siebertz M., Schroter F.A., Portele C., Jansen P. Affective Explicit and Implicit Attitudes towards Vegetarian and Vegan Food Consumption: The Role of Mindfulness. Appetite. 2022;169:105831. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105831. PubMed DOI

Goodwin J.N., Shoulders C.W. The Future of Meat: A Qualitative Analysis of Cultured Meat Media Coverage. Meat Sci. 2013;95:445–450. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.027. PubMed DOI

Bruns A. After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social Media Platforms and Their Fight against Critical Scholarly Research. Information, Commun. Soc. 2019;22:1544–1566. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447. DOI

Salvatore C., Biffignandi S., Bianchi A. Social Media and Twitter Data Quality for New Social Indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 2021;156:601–630. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02296-w. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...