Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% (cutaquig®) in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
36208448
PubMed Central
PMC9750824
DOI
10.1093/cei/uxac092
PII: 6754250
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- long-term safety, primary immunodeficiencies, prospective data, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, tolerability,
- MeSH
- bakteriální infekce * MeSH
- imunoglobulin G terapeutické užití MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- subkutánní infuze MeSH
- syndromy imunologické nedostatečnosti * farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny MeSH
A prospective study and its long-term extension examined whether weekly treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) with a 16.5% subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg; cutaquig®) confers acceptable efficacy, safety, and tolerability over a follow-up of up to 238 weeks (>4 years). Seventy-five patients received 4462 infusions during up to 70 weeks of follow-up in the main study and 27 patients received 2777 infusions during up to 168 weeks of follow-up in the extension. In the main study, there were no serious bacterial infections (SBIs), and the annual rate of other infections was 3.3 (95% CI 2.4, 4.5). One SBI was recorded in the extension, for an SBI rate of 0.02 (upper 99% CI 0.19). The annual rate of all infections over the duration of the extension study was 2.2 (95% CI 1.2, 3.9). Only 15.0% (1085) of 7239 infusions were associated with infusion site reactions (ISRs), leaving 85.0% (6153) of infusions without reactions. The majority of ISRs were mild and transient. ISR incidence decreased over time, from 36.9% to 16% during the main study and from 9% to 2.3% during the extension. The incidence of related systemic adverse events was 14.7% in the main study and 7.4% in the extension. In conclusion, this prospective, long-term study with cutaquig showed maintained efficacy and low rates of local and systemic adverse reactions in PID patients over up to 238 weeks of follow-up.
Allergy and Asthma Center Inc Toledo OH USA
Department of Pediatric Allergy Asthma and Immunology University of Alabama Birmingham AL USA
Division of Basic and Clinical Immunology University of California Irvine Irvine CA USA
Division of Hematology Department of Medicine University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton AB Canada
Divisions of Allergy and Immunology University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
IMMUNOe Research Center Centennial CO USA
Midlands Pediatrics Papillion NE USA
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges m b H Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bousfiha A, Jeddane L, Picard C, Al-Herz W, Ailal F, Chatila T, et al. . Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update of the IUIS phenotypical Classification. J Clin Immunol 2020, 40, 66–81. doi:10.1007/s10875-020-00758-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Chatila T, Cunningham-Rundles C, Etzioni A, et al. . Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J Clin Immunol 2020, 40, 24–64. doi:10.1007/s10875-019-00737-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Cunningham-Rundles C, Franco JL, Holland SM, et al. . The ever-increasing array of novel inborn errors of immunity: an interim update by the IUIS Committee. J Clin Immunol 2021, 41, 666–79. doi:10.1007/s10875-021-00980-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Bonilla FA, Barlan I, Chapel H, Costa-Carvalho BT, Cunningham-Rundles C, de la Morena MT, et al. . International Consensus Document (ICON): common variable immunodeficiency disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2016, 4, 38–59. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.025. PubMed DOI PMC
Bonilla FA, Khan DA, Ballas ZK, Chinen J, Frank MM, Hsu JT, et al. . Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015, 136, 1186–205.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.049. PubMed DOI
Bonagura VR. Using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to treat patients with primary immune deficiency disease. J Clin Immunol 2013, 33, 90–4. doi:10.1007/s10875-012-9838-1. PubMed DOI
Borte M, Kriván G, Derfalvi B, Maródi L, Harrer T, Jolles S, et al. . Efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel human immune globulin subcutaneous, 20%: a Phase 2/3 study in Europe in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol 2017, 187, 146–59. doi:10.1111/cei.12866. PubMed DOI PMC
Kobayashi RH, Litzman J, Rizvi S, Kreuwel H, Hoeller S, Gupta S. Overview of subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% in primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases. Immunotherapy 2022, 14, 259–70. doi:10.2217/imt-2021-0313. PubMed DOI
Gelbmann N, Zöchling A, Pichotta A, Schmidt T, Murányi A, Ernegger T, et al. . Octanorm [cutaquig®], a new immunoglobulin (human) subcutaneous 16.5% solution for injection (165 mg/mL)—biochemical characterization, pathogen safety, and stability. Biologicals 2019, 60, 60–7. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.05.002. PubMed DOI
Jolles S, Borte M, Nelson RP, Rojavin M, Bexon M, Lawo J-P, et al. . Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Hizentra® for treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Immunol 2014, 150, 161–9. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2013.10.008. PubMed DOI
Suez D, Stein M, Gupta S, Hussain I, Melamed I, Paris K, et al. . Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a novel human immune globulin subcutaneous, 20% in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases in North America. J Clin Immunol 2016, 36, 700–12. doi:10.1007/s10875-016-0327-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Jolles S, Rojavin MA, Lawo J-P, Nelson R, Wasserman RL, Borte M, et al. . Long-Term efficacy and safety of Hizentra® in patients with primary immunodeficiency in Japan, Europe, and the United States: a review of 7 phase 3 trials. J Clin Immunol 2018, 38, 864–75. doi:10.1007/s10875-018-0560-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Kobayashi RH, Gupta S, Melamed I, Mandujano JF, Kobayashi AL, Ritchie B, et al. . Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of a new subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% (Octanorm [Cutaquig®]) in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 40. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00040. PubMed DOI PMC
Conley ME, Notarangelo LD, Etzioni A. Diagnostic criteria for primary immunodeficiencies. Representing PAGID (Pan-American Group for Immunodeficiency) and ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiencies). Clin Immunol 1999, 93, 190–7. doi:10.1006/clim.1999.4799. PubMed DOI
Ballow M, Notarangelo L, Grimbacher B, Cunningham-Rundles C, Stein M, Helbert M, et al. . Immunodeficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol 2009, 158, 14–22. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04023.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Hizentra [package insert]. Bern, Switzerland: CSL Behring; 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic studies to support marketing of immune globulin intravenous (human) as replacement therapy for primary humoral immunodeficiency 2008. https://www.fda.gov/media/124333/download. (February 20 2022, date last accessed)
Hagan JB, Fasano MB, Spector S, Wasserman RL, Melamed I, Rojavin MA, et al. . Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol 2010, 30, 734–45. doi:10.1007/s10875-010-9423-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M. Subcutaneous IgG study group. Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol 2006, 26, 265–73. doi:10.1007/s10875-006-9021-7. PubMed DOI
Jolles S, Bernatowska E, de Gracia J, Borte M, Cristea V, Peter HH, et al. . Efficacy and safety of Hizentra(®) in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol 2011, 141, 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2011.06.002. PubMed DOI
Jones CA, et al. . Patients with primary immunodeficiency receiving subcutaneous immune globulin Hizentra maintain health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in a multicentre extension study of efficacy, tolerability and safety. J Pharm Health Serv Res 2012, 3, 41–7. doi:10.1111/j.1759-8893.2011.00076.x. DOI
Vultaggio A, Azzari C, Milito C, Finocchi A, Toppino C, Spadaro G, et al. . Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency in routine clinical practice: The VISPO Prospective Multicenter Study. Clin Drug Investig 2015, 35, 179–85. doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0270-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang Y, Baheti G, Chapdelaine H, Hofmann J, Rojavin M, Tortorici M, et al. . Population pharmacokinetic analysis of weekly and biweekly IgPro20 (Hizentra®) dosing in patients with primary immunodeficiency. Int Immunopharmacol 2020, 81, 106005. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106005. PubMed DOI
Navarro-Mora G, Alberti JJ, Mondou E, Vilardell D, Vicente Torres J, Ayguasanosa J, et al. . Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of subcutaneous and intravenous IgG dosing in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Int Immunopharmacol 2022, 104, 108472. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108472. PubMed DOI