Genome duplication is safeguarded by constantly adjusting the activity of the replicative CMG (CDC45-MCM2-7-GINS) helicase. However, minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs)-the structural core of the CMG helicase-have never been visualized at sites of DNA synthesis inside a cell (the so-called MCM paradox). Here, we solve this conundrum by showing that anti-MCM antibodies primarily detect inactive MCMs. Upon conversion of inactive MCMs to CMGs, factors that are required for replisome activity bind to the MCM scaffold and block MCM antibody binding sites. Tagging of endogenous MCMs by CRISPR-Cas9 bypasses this steric hindrance and enables MCM visualization at active replisomes. Thus, by defining conditions for detecting the structural core of the replicative CMG helicase, our results explain the MCM paradox, provide visual proof that MCMs are an integral part of active replisomes in vivo, and enable the investigation of replication dynamics in living cells exposed to a constantly changing environment.

Center for Chromosome Stability Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Cell Biology and Epigenetics Institute of Biophysics Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic

Protein Signaling Program Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Evrin C, et al. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:20240–20245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911500106. PubMed DOI PMC

Remus D, et al. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell. 2009;139:719–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.015. PubMed DOI PMC

Miller TCR, Locke J, Greiwe JF, Diffley JFX, Costa A. Mechanism of head-to-head MCM double-hexamer formation revealed by cryo-EM. Nature. 2019;575:704–710. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1768-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Deegan TD, Diffley JF. MCM: one ring to rule them all. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;37:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.01.014. PubMed DOI

Hyrien O, Marheineke K, Goldar A. Paradoxes of eukaryotic DNA replication: MCM proteins and the random completion problem. Bioessays. 2003;25:116–125. doi: 10.1002/bies.10208. PubMed DOI

Alver RC, Chadha GS, Blow JJ. The contribution of dormant origins to genome stability: from cell biology to human genetics. DNA Repair. 2014;19:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.012. PubMed DOI PMC

Madine MA, Khoo CY, Mills AD, Musahl C, Laskey RA. The nuclear envelope prevents reinitiation of replication by regulating the binding of MCM3 to chromatin in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr. Biol. 1995;5:1270–1279. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00253-3. PubMed DOI

Todorov IT, Attaran A, Kearsey SE. BM28, a human member of the MCM2-3-5 family, is displaced from chromatin during DNA replication. J. Cell Biol. 1995;129:1433–1445. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1433. PubMed DOI PMC

Krude T, Musahl C, Laskey RA, Knippers R. Human replication proteins hCdc21, hCdc46 and P1Mcm3 bind chromatin uniformly before S-phase and are displaced locally during DNA replication. J. Cell Sci. 1996;109:309–318. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.2.309. PubMed DOI

Dimitrova DS, Todorov IT, Melendy T, Gilbert DM. Mcm2, but not RPA, is a component of the mammalian early G1-phase prereplication complex. J. Cell Biol. 1999;146:709–722. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.4.709. PubMed DOI PMC

Sedlackova H, et al. Equilibrium between nascent and parental MCM proteins protects replicating genomes. Nature. 2020;587:297–302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2842-3. PubMed DOI

Woodward AM, et al. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J. Cell Biol. 2006;173:673–683. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200602108. PubMed DOI PMC

Ge XQ, Jackson DA, Blow JJ. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev. 2007;21:3331–3341. doi: 10.1101/gad.457807. PubMed DOI PMC

Laskey RA, Madine MA. A rotary pumping model for helicase function of MCM proteins at a distance from replication forks. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:26–30. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor706. PubMed DOI PMC

Aparicio T, Megias D, Mendez J. Visualization of the MCM DNA helicase at replication factories before the onset of DNA synthesis. Chromosoma. 2012;121:499–507. doi: 10.1007/s00412-012-0381-x. PubMed DOI

Masata M, Juda P, Raska O, Cardoso MC, Raska I. A fraction of MCM 2 proteins remain associated with replication foci during a major part of S phase. Folia Biol. (Praha) 2011;57:3–11. PubMed

Kuipers MA, et al. Highly stable loading of Mcm proteins onto chromatin in living cells requires replication to unload. J. Cell Biol. 2011;192:29–41. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007111. PubMed DOI PMC

Toledo LI, et al. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell. 2013;155:1088–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.043. PubMed DOI

Abid Ali F, et al. Cryo-EM structure of a licensed DNA replication origin. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2241. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02389-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Jones ML, Baris Y, Taylor MRG, Yeeles JTP. Structure of a human replisome shows the organisation and interactions of a DNA replication machine. EMBO J. 2021;40:e108819. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021108819. PubMed DOI PMC

Wessel SR, Mohni KN, Luzwick JW, Dungrawala H, Cortez D. Functional analysis of the replication fork proteome identifies BET proteins as PCNA regulators. Cell Rep. 2019;28:3497–3509 e3494. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.051. PubMed DOI PMC

Li, Z. & Xu, X. Post-translational modifications of the mini-chromosome maintenance proteins in DNA replication. Genes10, 10.3390/genes10050331 (2019). PubMed PMC

Moreno SP, Bailey R, Campion N, Herron S, Gambus A. Polyubiquitylation drives replisome disassembly at the termination of DNA replication. Science. 2014;346:477–481. doi: 10.1126/science.1253585. PubMed DOI

Dewar JM, Budzowska M, Walter JC. The mechanism of DNA replication termination in vertebrates. Nature. 2015;525:345–350. doi: 10.1038/nature14887. PubMed DOI PMC

Symeonidou IE, et al. Multi-step loading of human minichromosome maintenance proteins in live human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:35852–35867. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.474825. PubMed DOI PMC

Somyajit K, et al. Redox-sensitive alteration of replisome architecture safeguards genome integrity. Science. 2017;358:797–802. doi: 10.1126/science.aao3172. PubMed DOI

Schalbetter SA, Mansoubi S, Chambers AL, Downs JA, Baxter J. Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E4565–E4570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505356112. PubMed DOI PMC

Koch B, et al. Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:1465–1487. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.042. PubMed DOI PMC

Cong L, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143. PubMed DOI PMC

Helsby MA, et al. CiteAb: a searchable antibody database that ranks antibodies by the number of times they have been cited. BMC Cell Biol. 2014;15:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-15-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Lee WTC, et al. Single-molecule imaging reveals replication fork coupled formation of G-quadruplex structures hinders local replication stress signaling. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2525. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22830-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Barlow AL, Macleod A, Noppen S, Sanderson J, Guerin CJ. Colocalization analysis in fluorescence micrographs: verification of a more accurate calculation of pearson’s correlation coefficient. Microsc Microanal. 2010;16:710–724. doi: 10.1017/S143192761009389X. PubMed DOI

Quantity and quality of minichromosome maintenance protein complexes couple replication licensing to genome integrity