Dis-adoption of small-scale biogas plants in Vietnam: what is their fate?
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
20223111
Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze
NCM.DHH.2018.04
Hue University
PubMed
36369438
DOI
10.1007/s11356-022-24047-9
PII: 10.1007/s11356-022-24047-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- African swine fever, Appropriate technology, Biogas plant maintenance, Fixed-dome digester, Household anaerobic digester, Manure management, Technology abandonment,
- MeSH
- anaerobióza MeSH
- biopaliva MeSH
- bioreaktory MeSH
- hnůj * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nakládání s odpady * MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Vietnam MeSH
- Názvy látek
- biopaliva MeSH
- hnůj * MeSH
Biogas production at a small-scale level through anaerobic digestion has been promoted in Vietnam as an appropriate technology for cooking and animal waste management within rural households. Despite the large number of small-scale biogas plants being built, there is an increase in the reported cases of their dis-adoption. This study attempts to present the state of the art of biogas plants' abandonment issue and reveal the fate of biogas plants. The primary data were collected in Thua Thien Hue province in central Vietnam among owners of small-scale biogas plants selected with the purposive sampling technique. Methods included semi-structured interviews with respondents who abandoned their biogas technology (at least 6 months before the primary data collection) (n = 37) and with respondents who continually use it (n = 62). SPSS 25 IBM was used for the binary logit model with 6 independent variables. Using a logistic regression analysis of various cross-sectional data, key forces were uncovered to determine the factors that can influence the abandonment of biogas technology. Results showed that households with more members working on the farm and those more satisfied with the biogas plant maintenance are less likely to abandon it. Respondents provided the information that their biogas plants mainly were not used for any other purpose after dis-adoption (excepting biogas plants used for further storage of human excreta because they were connected to toilets).
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Centennial Group International (2013) Vietnam country report. Agricultural transformation & food security 2040. Asean region with a focus on Vietnam, Indonesia, and Philippines. Available online: https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12145546.pdf
Energypedia (2020) Fixed-dome Biogas Plants. Available online: https://energypedia.info/wiki/Fixed-dome_Biogas_Plants
Etsay H, Meles K, Hailu G, Hintsa K (2017) Determinants for adoption decision of small-scale biogas technology by rural households in Tigray, Ethiopia. Energy Econ 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.022
FAO (2018a) Small family farms country factsheet Viet Nam. Family farming knowledge platform. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i8358en/I8358EN.pdf
Fontenelle M, Alves HJ, Monteiro MR, Higa SM, Rovere CAD, Pellizzer EL, Fontenelle I (2017) Evaluation of corrosion caused by the use of in natura biogas in steam generator boilers of carbon steel structural elements. Mater Res 20(3):725–735. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0445 DOI
Huong LQ, Madsen H, Anh LX, Ngoc PT, Dalsgaard A (2014) Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 470–471:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.023 DOI
IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, and Waterfield T (eds.)]. In Press. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/download/
ISO 20675:2018. Biogas — biogas production, conditioning, upgrading and utilization — terms, definitions and classification scheme. 20
Jelínek M, Mazancová J, Dung DV, Phung LD, Banout J, Roubík H (2021) Quantification of the impact of partial replacement of traditional cooking fuels by biogas on global warming: evidence from Vietnam. J Clean Prod 292:126007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126007 DOI
Kabir H, Yegbemey RN, Bauer S (2013) Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.046 DOI
Le VP, Jeong DG, Yoon SW, Kwon HM, Trinh TBN, Nguyen TL, Bui TTN, Oh J, Kim JB, Cheong KM, Tuyen NV, Bae E, Vu TTH, Yeom M, Na W, Song D (2019) Outbreak of African swine fever, Vietnam. Emerging Infect Dis 25(7):1433–1435. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2507.190303 DOI
Lwiza F, Mugisha J, Walekhwa P, Smith J, Balana B (2017) Dis-adoption of household biogas technologies in Central Uganda. Energy Sustain Dev 37:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.01.006 DOI
Mai NTA, Vu XD, Nguyen TTH, Nguyen VT, Trinh TBN, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Cho KH, Nguyen TL, Bui TTN, Jeong DG, Yoon SW, Truong T, Ambagala A, Song D, Le VP (2021) Molecular profile of African swine fever virus (ASFV) circulating in Vietnam during 2019–2020 outbreaks. Arch Virol 166:885–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04936-5 DOI
Morgan H Jr, Xie W, Liang J, Mao H, Lei H, Ruan R, Bu Q (2018) A techno-economic evaluation of anaerobic biogas producing systems in developing countries. Bioresour Technol 250:910–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.013 DOI
Nguyen VCN (2012) Small-scale anaerobic digesters in Vietnam - development and challenges. J Vietnam Environ 1:12–18. https://doi.org/10.13141/jve.vol1.no1.pp12-18 DOI
Normile D (2019) African swine fever marches across much of Asia. Science 364(6441):617–618. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.364.6441.617 DOI
Qu W, Qin T, Bluemling B (2013) Which factors are effective for farmers’ biogas use? - evidence from a large-scale survey in China. Energy Policy 63:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.019 DOI
Rajedran K, Aslanzadeh S, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Household biogas digesters – a review. Energies 5:2911–2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5082911 DOI
Roubík H, Mazancová J (2016) Small-scale biogas sector in central Vietnam: ways of financing of the technology. Agribusiness and the Rural Economy, 312–318. Agrarian Perspectives XXV: Global and European Challenges for Food Production, October, Prague, Czech Republic
Roubík H, Mazancová J (2019) Small-scale biogas plants in central Vietnam and biogas appliances with a focus on a flue gas analysis of biogas cook stoves. Renew Energy 131:1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.054 DOI
Roubík H, Mazancová J, Banout J, Verner V (2016) Addressing problems at small-scale biogas plants: a case study from central Vietnam. J Clean Prod 112(4):2784–2792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.114 DOI
Roubík H, Mazancová J, Dinh PL, Van DD, Banout J (2018) Biogas quality across small-scale biogas plants: a case of central Vietnam. Energies 11(7):1794–1806. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071794 DOI
Roubík H, Mazancová J, Phung LD, Dung DV (2017) Quantification of biogas potential from livestock waste in Vietnam. Agron Res 15:540–552
Roubík H, Mazancová J, Rydval J, Kvasnicka R (2020a) Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small-scale biogas technology through causal loops. Renew Energ 149:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.019 DOI
Roubík H, Barrera S, Dung DV, Phung LD, Mazancová J (2020b) Emission reduction potential of household biogas plants in developing countries: the case of central Vietnam. J Clean Prod 270(10):122257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122257 DOI
Salvia AL, Filho WL, Brandli LL, Griebeler JS (2019) Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: local and global issues. J Clean Prod 208:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242 DOI
Shallo L, Ayele M, Sime G (2020) Determinants of biogas technology adoption in southern Ethiopia. Energy Sustain Soc 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0236-x
SNV biogas programme for the animal husbandry sector in Vietnam (2005) Domestic biogas and CDM financing; perfect match or white elephant
Spuhler D (2014) Anaerobic digestion (small-scale). Available at https://www.sswm.info/content/anaerobic-digestion-small-scale#reference_book7934
Tabachnick BG & Fidell LS (2007). (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education
Tong T, Shaw R, Takeuchi Y (2012) Climate disaster resilience of the education sector in Thua Thien Hue Province, Central Vietnam. Nat Hazards 63:685–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0178-5 DOI
Truc NT, Nam TS, Ngan NVC, Bentzen J (2016) Factors influencing the adoption of small-scale biogas digesters in developing countries – empirical evidence from Vietnam. Int Bus Res 10(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n2p1 DOI
Tsydenova N, Morillas AV, Hernández AM, Soria DR, Wilches C, Pehlken A (2019) Feasibility and barriers for anaerobic digestion in Mexico City. Sustainability 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154114
USDA (2019) Voluntary report VM2019–0067 Vietnam African swine fever update. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Vietnam%20African%20Swine%20Fever%20Update_Hanoi_Vietnam_11-30-2019
Wang C, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Pang M (2016) Alternative policies to subsidise rural household biogas digesters. Energy Policy 93:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.007 DOI
Zhou X, Ou S, Huang C (2011) Problems and solutions based on comprehensive utilisation of biogas. Energy Procedia 5:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.008 DOI