Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I−III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2−4) vs. 1 (0−2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0−10) vs. 0 (0−0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510−937) vs. 270 (196−377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove University Hospital Hradec Kralove Sokolska 581 500 05 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Neurosurgery Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove University Hospital Hradec Kralove Sokolska 581 500 05 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Ortopedic Surgery J E Purkinje University Masaryk Hospital Sociální Péče 3316 12A 401 13 Usti nad Labem Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Makaryus R., Miller T.E., Gan T.J. Current concepts of fluid management in enhanced recovery pathways. Br. J. Anaesth. 2018;120:376–383. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.011. PubMed DOI

Simmons J.W., Dobyns J.B., Paiste J. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Intraoperative Fluid Management Strategies. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2018;98:1185–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.006. PubMed DOI

Noel-Morgan J., Muir W.W. Anaesthesia-Associated Relative Hypovolemia: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Treatment Considerations. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:53. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00053. PubMed DOI PMC

Miller T.E., Myles P.S. Perioperative Fluid Therapy for Major Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:825–832. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002603. PubMed DOI

Thacker J.K., Mountford W.K., Ernst F.R., Krukas M.R., Mythen M.M. Perioperative Fluid Utilization Variability and Association With Outcomes: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery Efforts in Sample US Surgical Populations. Ann. Surg. 2016;263:502–510. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001402. PubMed DOI

Dharmavaram S., Jellish W.S., Nockels R.P., Shea J., Mehmood R., Ghanayem A., Kleinman B., Jacobs W. Effect of prone positioning systems on hemodynamic and cardiac function during lumbar spine surgery: An echocardiographic study. Spine. 2006;31:1388–1393. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000218485.96713.44. PubMed DOI

Chui J., Craen R.A. An update on the prone position: Continuing Professional Development. Can. J. Anaesth. 2016;63:737–767. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0634-x. PubMed DOI

Yokoyama M., Ueda W., Hirakawa M., Yamamoto H. Hemodynamic effect of the prone position during anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1991;35:741–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03382.x. PubMed DOI

Toyota S., Amaki Y. Hemodynamic evaluation of the prone position by transesophageal echocardiography. J. Clin. Anesth. 1998;10:32–35. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00216-X. PubMed DOI

Shimizu M., Fujii H., Yamawake N., Nishizaki M. Cardiac function changes with switching from the supine to prone position: Analysis by quantitative semiconductor gated single-photon emission computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2015;22:301–307. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0058-3. PubMed DOI

Bacchin M.R., Ceria C.M., Giannone S., Ghisi D., Stagni G., Greggi T., Bonarelli S. Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Stroke Volume Variation in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Cohort Study. Spine. 2016;41:E1131–E1137. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001601. PubMed DOI

Wang D.D., Li Y., Hu X.W., Zhang M.C., Xu X.M., Tang J. Comparison of restrictive fluid therapy with goal-directed fluid therapy for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Perioper. Med. 2021;10:48. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00220-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Che L., Zhang X.H., Li X., Zhang Y.L., Xu L., Huang Y.G. Outcome impact of individualized fluid management during spine surgery: A before-after prospective comparison study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:181. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01092-w. PubMed DOI PMC

Ameloot K., Palmers P.J., Malbrain M.L. The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output and pressure measurements with finger cuff: A concise review. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2015;21:232–239. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000198. PubMed DOI

Tanioku T., Yoshida A., Aratani Y., Fujii K., Kawamata T. Validation of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurement by ClearSight System™ during induction of anesthesia for cardiovascular surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:176. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01091-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Fischer M.O., Joosten A., Desebbe O., Boutros M., Debroczi S., Broch O., Malbrain M.L.N.G., Ameloot K., Hofer C.K., Bubenek-Turconi Ş.I., et al. Interchangeability of cardiac output measurements between noninvasive photoplethysmography and bolus thermodilution: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2020;39:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.05.007. PubMed DOI

Boisson M., Poignard M.E., Pontier B., Mimoz O., Debaene B., Frasca D. Cardiac output monitoring with thermodilution pulse-contour analysis vs. noninvasive pulse-contour analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:735–740. doi: 10.1111/anae.14638. PubMed DOI

Watson X., Cecconi M. Haemodynamic monitoring in the peri-operative period: The past, the present and the future. Anaesthesia. 2017;72((Suppl. S1)):7–15. doi: 10.1111/anae.13737. PubMed DOI

Juri T., Suehiro K., Kimura A., Mukai A., Tanaka K., Yamada T., Mori T., Nishikawa K. Impact of continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2018;32:1005–1013. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0125-4. PubMed DOI

Meidert A.S., Nold J.S., Hornung R., Paulus A.C., Zwißler B., Czerner S. The impact of continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure stability during general anaesthesia in orthopaedic patients: A randomised trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:716–722. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000690. PubMed DOI

Benes J., Simanova A., Tovarnicka T., Sevcikova S., Kletecka J., Zatloukal J., Pradl R., Chytra I., Kasal E. Continuous noninvasive monitoring improves blood pressure stability in upright position: Randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2015;29:11–17. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9586-2. PubMed DOI

Naylor A.J., Sessler D.I., Maheshwari K., Khanna A.K., Yang D., Mascha E.J., Suleiman I., Reville E.M., Cote D., Hutcherson M.T., et al. Arterial Catheters for Early Detection and Treatment of Hypotension During Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Randomised Trial. Anaesth. Analg. 2020;131:1540–1550. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004370. PubMed DOI

Saugel B., Sessler D.I. Perioperative Blood Pressure Management. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:250–261. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003610. PubMed DOI

Corcoran T., Rhodes J.E., Clarke S., Myles P.S., Ho K.M. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: A stratified meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2012;114:640–651. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318240d6eb. PubMed DOI

Biais M., Bernard O., Ha J.C., Degryse C., Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 2010;104:407–413. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq031. PubMed DOI

Vos J.J., Poterman M., Salm P.P., Van Amsterdam K., Struys M.M., Scheeren T.W., Kalmar A.F. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: A prospective observational study. Can. J. Anaesth. 2015;62:1153–1160. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0464-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Messina A., Montagnini C., Cammarota G., Giuliani F., Muratore L., Baggiani M., Bennett V., Della Corte F., Navalesi P., Cecconi M. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test. Anaesth. Analg. 2020;130:752–761. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004494. PubMed DOI

Watanabe R., Suehiro K., Mukai A., Tanaka K., Yamada T., Mori T., Nishikawa K. Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21:303. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01527-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Lima M.F., Mondadori L.A., Chibana A.Y., Gilio D.B., Giroud Joaquim E.H., Michard F. Outcome impact of hemodynamic and depth of anesthesia monitoring during major cancer surgery: A before-after study. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2019;33:365–371. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0190-8. PubMed DOI

Fellahi J.L., Futier E., Vaisse C., Collange O., Huet O., Loriau J., Gayat E., Tavernier B., Biais M., Asehnoune K., et al. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: From guidelines to implementation-an experts’ opinion paper. Ann. Intensive Care. 2021;11:58. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00845-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Chong M.A., Wang Y., Berbenetz N.M., McConachie I. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:469–483. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000778. PubMed DOI