SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36583728
DOI
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003790
PII: ijgc-2022-003790
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- cervical cancer, gynecologic surgical procedures, hysterectomy,
- MeSH
- hysterektomie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru chirurgie MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * patologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- ukazatele kvality zdravotní péče MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.
Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
Amsterdam University Medical Centres Amsterdam Noord Holland The Netherlands
Bellvitge University Hospital L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Catalunya Spain
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Milano Lombardia Italy
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital San Gerardo Monza Italy
Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka Rijeka Croatia
Department of Gynaecological Oncology Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust Portsmouth UK
Department of Gynecologic Oncology La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital Valencia Spain
Department of Gynecologic Oncology La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Gynecological Oncology Radboudumc Nijmegen Netherlands
Department of Gynecology and Oncology Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
Department of Gynecology Centre Oscar Lambret Lille France
Department of Gynecology Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
Department of Gynecology University Maternal Hospital Canary Islands Las Palmas Las Palmas Spain
Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milan Bicocca Milan Italy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinica Universidad de Navarra Madrid Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Liege Liege Belgium
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Prague Prague Czech Republic
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
Department of Surgery Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Department of Surgery LISOD Israeli Oncological Hospital Kyiv Region Ukraine
Endoscopica Malzoni Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery Avellino Italy
Hospital Universitario Donostia San Sebastian Spain
Institut Curie Paris Île de France France
Istanbul University Cerrrahpasa Medical Faculty istanbul Turkey
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia Milan Italy
Lviv Oncology Center Lviv Ukraine
Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus Piraeus Attika Greece
National Center of Oncology Baku Azerbaijan
North Estonia Medical Centre Tallinn Estonia
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Gateshead Gateshead UK
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester Leicester UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org