• This record comes from PubMed

Application of Genomic Sequencing to Refine Patient Stratification for Adjuvant Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

. 2023 Apr 03 ; 29 (7) : 1220-1231.

Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
001 World Health Organization - International

PURPOSE: Patients with resected localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain at variable risk of recurrence. Incorporation of biomarkers may refine risk prediction and inform adjuvant treatment decisions. We explored the role of tumor genomics in this setting, leveraging the largest cohort to date of localized ccRCC tissues subjected to targeted gene sequencing. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The somatic mutation status of 12 genes was determined in 943 ccRCC cases from a multinational cohort of patients, and associations to outcomes were examined in a Discovery (n = 469) and Validation (n = 474) framework. RESULTS: Tumors containing a von-Hippel Lindau (VHL) mutation alone were associated with significantly improved outcomes in comparison with tumors containing a VHL plus additional mutations. Within the Discovery cohort, those with VHL+0, VHL+1, VHL+2, and VHL+≥3 tumors had disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 90.8%, 80.1%, 68.2%, and 50.7% respectively, at 5 years. This trend was replicated in the Validation cohort. Notably, these genomically defined groups were independent of tumor mutational burden. Amongst patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, those with a VHL+0 tumor (29%) had a 5-year DFS rate of 79.3% and could, therefore, potentially be spared further treatment. Conversely, patients with VHL+2 and VHL+≥3 tumors (32%) had equivalent DFS rates of 45.6% and 35.3%, respectively, and should be prioritized for adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic characterization of ccRCC identified biologically distinct groups of patients with divergent relapse rates. These groups account for the ∼80% of cases with VHL mutations and could be used to personalize adjuvant treatment discussions with patients as well as inform future adjuvant trial design.

Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Prof Dr Th Burghele Clinical Hospital Bucharest Romania

Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine CEA Institut de Biologie Francois Jacob University Paris Saclay Evry France

Charles University Prague 1st Faculty of Medicine Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology Prague Czech Republic

Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic

Department of Histopathology Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Hills Road Cambridge United Kingdom

Department of Human Genetics McGill University Montreal Québec Canada

Department of Oncology Pathology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Division of Cancer and Stem Cells School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom

European Bioinformatics Institute European Molecular Biology Laboratory EMBL EBI Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton United Kingdom

Faculty of Health Sciences Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Toulouse France

Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Latvia Riga Latvia

Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine Military Medical Academy Belgrade Serbia

Institute of Pathology School of Medicine Belgrade University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University of Leeds St James's University Hospital Leeds United Kingdom

N N Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology Moscow Russian Federation

National Institute of Public Health Bucuresti Romania

Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom

Pyrah Department of Urology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Lincoln Wing St James's University Hospital Leeds United Kingdom

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust Stockport United Kingdom

University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

Victor Philip Dahdaleh Institute of Genomic Medicine at McGill University Montreal Québec Canada

World Health Organisation The Genomic Epidemiology Branch Lyon France

Comment In

1078-0432. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-29-7-HI PubMed

See more in PubMed

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. PubMed

Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 2015;67:519–30. PubMed

Dabestani S, Beisland C, Stewart GD, Bensalah K, Gudmundsson E, Lam TB, et al. . Long-term outcomes of follow-up for initially localized clear- cell renal cell carcinoma: RECUR database analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5:857–66. PubMed

Larroquette M, Peyraud F, Domblides C, Lefort F, Bernhard JC, Ravaud A, et al. . Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2021;97:102207. PubMed

Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Chang YH, et al. . Adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021;385:683–94. PubMed

Powles T, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Symeonides SN, et al. . Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:1133–44. PubMed

Pal SK, Uzzo R, Karam JA, Master VA, Donskov F, Suarez C, et al. . Adjuvant atezolizumab versus placebo for patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence following resection (IMmotion010): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Lancet 2022;400:1103–16. PubMed

Motzer RJ, Russo P, Gruenwald V, Tomita Y, Zurawski B, Parikh OA, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs placebo (PBO) for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy: results from the randomized, Phase III CheckMate 914 trial. Ann Oncol 2022;33:S808–S69.

Allaf M, Kim SE, Harshman LC, McDermott DF, Master VA, Signoretti S, et al. . Phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab (nivo) versus observation in patients (Pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER, ECOG-ACRIN EA8143), a national clinical trials network trial. Ann Oncol 2022;33:S808–S69.

Figlin RA, Leibovich BC, Stewart GD, Negrier S. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: does higher risk for recurrence improve the chance for success? Ann Oncol 2018;29:324–31. PubMed

Rossi SH, Blick C, Handforth C, Brown JE, Stewart GD. Renal Cancer Gap Analysis Collaborative. Essential research priorities in renal cancer: a modified Delphi consensus statement. Eur Urol Focus 2020;6:991–98. PubMed

Ricketts CJ, De Cubas AA, Fan H, Smith CC, Lang M, Reznik E, et al. . The Cancer Genome Atlas comprehensive molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep 2018;23:313–26. PubMed PMC

Scelo G, Riazalhosseini Y, Greger L, Letourneau L, Gonzalez-Porta M, Wozniak MB, et al. . Variation in genomic landscape of clear- cell renal cell carcinoma across Europe. Nat Commun 2014;5:5135. PubMed

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear- cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 2013;499:43–9. PubMed PMC

Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Horswell S, Chambers T, et al. . Deterministic evolutionary trajectories influence primary tumor growth: TRACERx renal. Cell 2018;173:595–610. PubMed PMC

Bourgey M, Dali R, Eveleigh R, Chen KC, Letourneau L, Fillon J, et al. . GenPipes: an open-source framework for distributed and scalable genomic analyses. Gigascience 2019;8:giz037. PubMed PMC

FulcrumGenomics. 1/09/2020. fgbio. Available from:https://github.com/fulcrumgenomics/fgbio.

Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, et al. . VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy-number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 2012;22:568–76. PubMed PMC

Lai Z, Markovets A, Ahdesmaki M, Chapman B, Hofmann O, McEwen R, et al. . VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:e108. PubMed PMC

Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. . A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012;6:80–92. PubMed PMC

Paila U, Chapman BA, Kirchner R, Quinlan AR. GEMINI: integrative exploration of genetic variation and genome annotations. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9:e1003153. PubMed PMC

Gray RJ. cmprsk: subdistribution analysis of competing risks 2010.

Riazalhosseini Y, Lathrop M. Precision medicine from the renal cancer genome. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016;12:655–66. PubMed

Glennon KI, Maralani M, Abdian N, Paccard A, Montermini L, Nam AJ, et al. . Rational development of liquid biopsy analysis in renal cell carcinoma. Cancers 2021;13:5825. PubMed PMC

Dalgliesh GL, Furge K, Greenman C, Chen L, Bignell G, Butler A, et al. . Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature 2010;463:360–3. PubMed PMC

Guo G, Gui Y, Gao S, Tang A, Hu X, Huang Y, et al. . Frequent mutations of genes encoding ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathway components in clear- cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 2012;44:17–9. PubMed

Sato Y, Yoshizato T, Shiraishi Y, Maekawa S, Okuno Y, Kamura T, et al. . Integrated molecular analysis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 2013;45:860–7. PubMed

Kapur P, Pena-Llopis S, Christie A, Zhrebker L, Pavia-Jimenez A, Rathmell WK, et al. . Effects on survival of BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations in sporadic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis with independent validation. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:159–67. PubMed PMC

Joseph RW, Kapur P, Serie DJ, Parasramka M, Ho TH, Cheville JC, et al. . Clear- cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes identified by BAP1 and PBRM1 expression. J Urol 2016;195:180–7. PubMed PMC

Ho TH, Kapur P, Joseph RW, Serie DJ, Eckel-Passow JE, Tong P, et al. . Loss of histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation is associated with an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma-specific death. Mod Pathol 2016;29:34–42. PubMed PMC

Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Frank I, Kwon ED, et al. . Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear- cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003;97:1663–71. PubMed

Hakimi AA, Ostrovnaya I, Reva B, Schultz N, Chen YB, Gonen M, et al. . Adverse outcomes in clear- cell renal cell carcinoma with mutations of 3p21 epigenetic regulators BAP1 and SETD2: a report by MSKCC and the KIRC TCGA research network. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:3259–67. PubMed PMC

Manley BJ, Zabor EC, Casuscelli J, Tennenbaum DM, Redzematovic A, Becerra MF, et al. . Integration of recurrent somatic mutations with clinical outcomes: a pooled analysis of 1,049 patients with clear- cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2017;3:421–27. PubMed PMC

Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear- cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade, and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol 2002;168:2395–400. PubMed

Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Wieder J, Chao DH, Dorey F, Said JW, et al. . Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4559–66. PubMed

Correa AF, Jegede O, Haas NB, Flaherty KT, Pins MR, Messing EM, et al. . Predicting renal cancer recurrence: defining limitations of existing prognostic models with prospective trial-based validation. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:2062–71. PubMed PMC

Oza B, Eisen T, Frangou E, Stewart GD, Bex A, Ritchie AWS, et al. . External validation of the 2003 leibovich prognostic score in patients randomly assigned to SORCE, an international phase III trial of adjuvant sorafenib in renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:1772–82. PubMed PMC

Vasudev NS, Hutchinson M, Trainor S, Ferguson R, Bhattarai S, Adeyoju A, et al. . UK multicenter prospective evaluation of the Leibovich score in localized renal cell carcinoma: performance has altered over time. Urology 2020;136:162–8. PubMed PMC

Rini B, Goddard A, Knezevic D, Maddala T, Zhou M, Aydin H, et al. . A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localized renal cell carcinoma: development and validation studies. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:676–85. PubMed

Rini BI, Escudier B, Martini JF, Magheli A, Svedman C, Lopatin M, et al. . Validation of the 16-gene recurrence score in patients with locoregional, high-risk renal cell carcinoma from a phase III trial of adjuvant sunitinib. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:4407–15. PubMed

Tosoian JJ, Feldman AS, Abbott MR, Mehra R, Tiemeny P, Wolf JS Jr, et al. . Biopsy cell-cycle proliferation score predicts adverse surgical pathology in localized renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2020;78:657–60. PubMed

Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Powles T, McDermott D, Atkins MB, et al. . Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell 2020;38:803–17. PubMed PMC

Gerlinger M, Horswell S, Larkin J, Rowan AJ, Salm MP, Varela I, et al. . Genomic architecture and evolution of clear- cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multi-region sequencing. Nat Genet 2014;46:225–33. PubMed PMC

Gulati S, Martinez P, Joshi T, Birkbak NJ, Santos CR, Rowan AJ, et al. . Systematic evaluation of the prognostic impact and intra-tumor heterogeneity of clear- cell renal cell carcinoma biomarkers. Eur Urol 2014;66:936–48. PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...