The risk of post-operative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide: a prospective multicentre study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36891072
PubMed Central
PMC9986753
DOI
10.1183/23120541.00421-2022
PII: 00421-2022
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: According to the guidelines for preoperative assessment of lung resection candidates, patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) are at low risk for post-operative pulmonary complications (PPC). However, PPC affect hospital length of stay and related healthcare costs. We aimed to assess risk of PPC for lung resection candidates with normal FEV1 and D LCO (>80% predicted) and identify factors associated with PPC. METHODS: 398 patients were prospectively studied at two centres between 2017 and 2021. PPC were recorded from the first 30 post-operative days. Subgroups of patients with and without PPC were compared and factors with significant difference were analysed by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 188 subjects had normal FEV1 and D LCO. Of these, 17 patients (9%) developed PPC. Patients with PPC had significantly lower pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P ETCO2 ) at rest (27.7 versus 29.9; p=0.033) and higher ventilatory efficiency (V'E/V'CO2 ) slope (31.1 versus 28; p=0.016) compared to those without PPC. Multivariate models showed association between resting P ETCO2 (OR 0.872; p=0.035) and V'E/V'CO2 slope (OR 1.116; p=0.03) and PPC. In both models, thoracotomy was strongly associated with PPC (OR 6.419; p=0.005 and OR 5.884; p=0.007, respectively). Peak oxygen consumption failed to predict PPC (p=0.917). CONCLUSIONS: Resting P ETCO2 adds incremental information for risk prediction of PPC in patients with normal FEV1 and D LCO. We propose resting P ETCO2 be an additional parameter to FEV1 and D LCO for preoperative risk stratification.
1st Department of Surgery St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Respiratory Diseases University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Surgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno Czech Republic
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, et al. . ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 17–41. doi:10.1183/09031936.00184308 PubMed DOI
Agostini P, Cieslik H, Rathinam S, et al. . Postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery: are there any modifiable risk factors? Thorax 2010; 65: 815–818. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.123083 PubMed DOI
Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, et al. . Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 247–254. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.060 PubMed DOI
Powell HA, Tata LJ, Baldwin DR, et al. . Early mortality after surgical resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the English National Lung cancer audit. Thorax 2013; 68: 826–834. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203123 PubMed DOI
Brat K, Tothova Z, Merta Z, et al. . Resting end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts respiratory complications in patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 1725–1730. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.070 PubMed DOI
Stéphan F, Boucheseiche S, Hollande J, et al. . Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest 2000; 118: 1263–1270. doi:10.1378/chest.118.5.1263 PubMed DOI
Sandblom G, Videhult P, Crona Guterstam Y, et al. . Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 239–243. doi:10.1111/hpb.12356 PubMed DOI PMC
Humes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis. BMJ 2006; 333: 530–534. doi:10.1136/bmj.38940.664363.AE PubMed DOI PMC
Brunelli A, Belardinelli R, Pompili C, et al. . Minute ventilation-to-carbon dioxide output (V′E/V′CO2) slope is the strongest predictor of respiratory complications and death after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1802–1806. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.022 PubMed DOI
Shafiek H, Valera JL, Togores B, et al. . Risk of postoperative complications in chronic obstructive lung diseases patients considered fit for lung cancer surgery: beyond oxygen consumption. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50: 772–779. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw104 PubMed DOI
Brat K, Homolka P, Merta Z, et al. . Prediction of postoperative complications: ventilatory efficiency and rest end-tidal carbon dioxide. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; in press [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.073]. PubMed DOI
Brat K, Chobola M, Homolka P, et al. . Poor ventilatory efficiency during exercise may predict prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020; 30: 269–272. PubMed
Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, et al. . General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 153–161. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034505 PubMed DOI
Torchio R, Guglielmo M, Giardino R, et al. . Exercise ventilatory inefficiency and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38: 14–19. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.032 PubMed DOI
Choi H, Mazzone P. Preoperative evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for lung resection. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015; 28: 18–25. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000149 PubMed DOI
Sanchez-Lorente D, Navarro-Ripoll R, Guzman R, et al. . Prehabilitation in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: Suppl. 22, S2593–S2600. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.08.18 PubMed DOI PMC
Miyazaki T, Callister MEJ, Franks K, et al. . Minute ventilation-to-carbon dioxide slope is associated with postoperative survival after anatomical lung resection. Lung Cancer 2018; 125: 218–222. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.003 PubMed DOI
Woods PR, Olson TP, Frantz RP, et al. . Causes of breathing inefficiency during exercise in heart failure. J Card Fail 2010; 16: 835–842. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.05.003 PubMed DOI PMC
Lewis DA, Sietsema KE, Casaburi R, et al. . Inaccuracy of noninvasive estimates of VD/VT in clinical exercise testing. Chest 1994; 106: 1476–1480. doi:10.1378/chest.106.5.1476 PubMed DOI
Cundrle I, Johnson BD, Rea RF, et al. . Modulation of ventilatory reflex control by cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Card Fail 2015; 21: 367–373. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.12.013 PubMed DOI PMC
Cundrle I Jr, Somers VK, Johnson BD, et al. . Exercise end-tidal CO2 predicts central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure. Chest 2015; 147: 1566–1573. doi:10.1378/chest.14-2114 PubMed DOI PMC
Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 70–84. doi:10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 PubMed DOI
Oparka J, Yan TD, Ryan E, et al. . Does video-assisted thoracic surgery provide a safe alternative to conventional techniques in patients with limited pulmonary function who are otherwise suitable for lung resection? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17: 159–162. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivt097 PubMed DOI PMC
Gravier FE, Smondack P, Boujibar F, et al. . Prehabilitation sessions can be provided more frequently in a shortened regimen with similar or better efficacy in people with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised trial. J Physiother 2022; 68: 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.010 PubMed DOI