Mapping frameworks and approaches to measuring the quality of transition support services for young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
36896251
PubMed Central
PMC9989196
DOI
10.3389/fresc.2023.1043564
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- education, intellectual and developmental disabilities, measurement, quality of life, quality of support services, transition,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Transition to adulthood for young people with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities (IDD) has been given significant attention in research, policy development and practice. The aim of this paper was to explore how a recently developed theoretical outcomes-based framework for measuring the quality of services for people with disabilities could potentially be useful in conceptualizing and supporting successful transition to adulthood. The theoretical discussion draws on both the scoping review and template analysis that was used to develop the Service Quality Framework and on a separate study synthesizing expert completed country templates and literature review which included models of and research on successful transition to adulthood. Synthesis identified that using a quality of life outcomes focused framework of Service Quality could be mapped onto and extend current thinking on what is seen as successful transition to adulthood by putting the focus on successful transition as people with IDD moving towards having similar opportunities and quality of life as other adults without disabilities living in the same community/society. Implications of a more wide-ranging definition and holistic view for both practice and future research are discussed.
Faculty of Education University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Pilsen and Charles University Prague Czech
Faculty of Education University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Pilsen Czech
Tizard Centre University of Kent University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Canterbury United Kingdom
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ravenscroft J, Wazny K, Davis JM. Factors associated with successful transition among children with disabilities in eight European countries. PLoS One. (2017) 12(6):e0179904. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179904 PubMed DOI PMC
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (December 13, 2006).
Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J, Káňová Š, Šumníková P. Social inclusion through community living: current situation, advances and gaps in policy, practice and research. Social Inclusion. (2018) 6(1):94–109. 10.17645/si.v6i1.1211 DOI
Ormston R, Eunson J, McAteer G. Improving outcomes for people with learning disabilities: Opportunities and challenges for housing. Key Findings and Recommendations. Ipsos MORI Scotland (2017). Available at: https://www.scld.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Improving-Outcomes-key-findings.pdf
Kaehne A, Kiernan J, Ridley J. Systematic review of study designs and methods in health transition research for young people with intellectual disabilities. Heliyon. (2019) 5(11):e02750. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02750 PubMed DOI PMC
Sullivan WF, Heng J, Abells D, Perry A, Henze M. Supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to cope and thrive through transitions to later-life phases. Can Fam Physician. (2019) 65(Suppl 1):S30–2. PubMed PMC
Mazzotti VL, Rowe DA, Kwiatek S, Voggt A, Chang W, Fowler C, et al. Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: an update to the research base. Career Dev Transit Except Individ. (2021) 44(1):47–64. 10.1177/2165143420959793 DOI
Wehman P. Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookers Publishing; (2001).
Wehman P, Schall C, Carr S, Targett P, West M, Cifu G. Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism Spectrum disorder. J Disabil Policy Stud. (2014) 25(1):30–40. 10.1177/1044207313518071 DOI
Settersten RA, Ray B. What's going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. Future Child. (2011) 20:19–41. 10.1353/foc.0.0044 PubMed DOI
Dispenza F. Empowering the career development of persons with disabilities (PWD). J Career Dev. (2019) 48(5):670–85. 10.1177/0894845319884636 DOI
Morwane RE, Dada S, Bornman J. Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Afr J Disabil. (2021) 10:833. 10.4102/ajod.v10i0.833 PubMed DOI PMC
Šiška J, Tichá R, Stancliffe R, Beadle-Brown J, Abery B, Káňová Š. Transition to where and to what: mapping the current situation, advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research on transition for students with IDD across four countries. Submittted to the Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability.
France A, Threadgold S. Youth and political economy: towards a bourdieusian approach. J Youth Stud. (2016) 19(5):612–28. 10.1080/13676261.2015.1098779 DOI
Pearson C, Watson N, Gangneux J, Norberg I. Transition to where and to what? Exploring the experiences of transitions to adulthood for young disabled people. J Youth Stud. (2021) 24(10):1291–307. 10.1080/13676261.2020.1820972 DOI
Bradshaw J. Ensuring quality in practice—person-centred approaches. In: Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J, editors. The development, conceptualisation and implementation of quality in disability support services. Prague: Karolinum Press; (2021).
Maniatopoulos G, Le Couteur A, Vale L, Colver A. Falling through the gaps: exploring the role of integrated commissioning in improving transition from children's To adults’ services for young people with long-term health conditions in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. (2018) 23(2):107–15. 10.1177/1355819617752744 PubMed DOI PMC
Garrels V, Sigstad HMH. Employment for persons with intellectual disability in the nordic countries: a scoping review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. (2021) 34:993–1007. 10.1111/jar.12880 PubMed DOI
McNeil B, Reeder N, Rich J. A framework of outcomes for young people. UK: The Young Foundation; (2012). https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Framework-of-outcomes-for-young-people-July-2012.pdf
Test DW, Mazzotti VL, Mustian AL, Fowler C, Kortering L, Kohler P. Evidence-Based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Dev Except Indi. (2009) 32(3):160–81. 10.1177/0885728809346960 DOI
Lindsay S, Lamptey D-L, Cagliostro E, Srikanthan D, Mortaji N, Karon L. A systematic review of post-secondary transition interventions for youth with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. (2018) 41(21):2492–505. 10.1080/09638288.2018.1470260 PubMed DOI
Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J. (Tech.). Innovative frameworks for measuring the quality of services for persons with disabilities. Brussels, Belgium: EASPD; (2021).
Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Health Administration Press; (1980).
Schalock RL, Brown I, Brown R, Cummins RA, Felce D, Matikka L, et al. Conceptualization, measurement, and application of QoLfor persons with intellectual disabilities: report of an international panel of experts. Ment Retard. (2002) 40(6):457–70. 10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0457:cmaaoq>2.0.co;2 PubMed DOI
Schalock RL, Verdugo MA. Quality of life as a change agent. In: Brown RI, Faragher RM, editors. Quality of life and intellectual disability: knowledge application to other social and educational challenges. New York: Nova Science Publishers; (2014). p. 19–34.
Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J. Innovative framework for measuring the quality of services for persons with disabilities. EASPD. International conference: quality of life & support services: from words to action; October 13, 2022; Malta (n.d.).
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. Prague: JBI; (2020). Available at: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12 DOI
Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J. The development, conceptualisation and implementation of quality in disability support services. Karolinum Press; (2021).
Siperstein GN, Parker RC, Drascher M. National snapshot of adults with intellectual disabilities in the labor force. J Vocat Rehabil. (2013) 39(3):157–65. 10.3233/jvr-130658 DOI
Lecerf M. Employment and disability in the European Union—European Parliament (n.d.). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/651932/EPRS_BRI(2020)651932_EN.pdf (Retrieved April 10, 2022)
Vaalavuo M. Part-time work: A divided Europe. Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion—European Commission (2016). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp (Retrieved March 10, 2022)
Kocman A, Fischer L, Weber G. The Employers’ perspective on barriers and facilitators to employment of people with intellectual disability: a differential mixed-method approach. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. (2018) 31:120–31. 10.1111/jar.12375 PubMed DOI
Linehan C, Birkbeck G, Araten-Bergman T, Baumbusch J, Beadle-Brown J, Bigby C. COVID-19 IDD: findings from a global survey exploring family members’ and paid staff's Perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and their caregivers. HRB Open Res. (2022) 5:27. 10.12688/hrbopenres.13497.1 PubMed DOI PMC
Šiška J, Beadle-Brown J. Progress on deinstitutionalisation and the development of community living for persons with disabilities in Europe: are we nearly there? Disabil Soc. (2022):1–20. 10.1080/09687599.2022.2071676 DOI
Stancliffe RJ, Lakin KC, Larson S, Engler J, Taub S, Fortune J. Choice of living arrangements. J Intellect Disabil Res. (2011) 55:746–62. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x PubMed DOI
Hatton C, Watters J. National personal budgets survey 2013: summary of main findings and next steps. Lancaster: Lancaster University and In Control; (2013).
Söderström S, Tøssebro J. Innfridde mål elelr brudte visjoner [fulfilled ideals or broken promises]. Trondheim: NTNU Social Research; (2011).
Codd J, Hewitt O. Having a son or daughter with an intellectual disability transition to adulthood: a parental perspective. Br J Learn Disabil. (2020) 49(1):39–51. 10.1111/bld.12327 DOI
Biswas S, Tickle A, Golijani-Moghaddam N, Almack K. The transition into adulthood for children with a severe intellectual disability: parents’ views. Int J Dev Disabil. (2016) 63(2):99–109. 10.1080/20473869.2016.1138598 DOI
Hendricks DR, Wehman P. Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism Spectrum disorders: review and recommendations. Focus on Autism Other Dev Disabil. (2009) 24(2):77–88. 10.1177/1088357608329827 DOI
Mansell J, Beadle-Brown J. Active support enabling and empowering people with intellectual disabilities. Jessica Kingsley Publ; (2012).
Bigby C, De Losa L. After-school jobs for students with intellectual disabilities. La Trobe. Report (2021). doi: 10.26181/60876b527487b
Kerr H, Widger K, Cullen-Dean G, Price J, O'Halloran P. Transition from children's To adult services for adolescents/young adults with life-limiting conditions: developing realist programme theory through an international comparison. BMC Palliat Care. (2020) 19(115):1–11. 10.1186/s12904-020-00620-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Broach S, Clements LJ. Disabled children: a legal handbook. Legal Action Group; (2020).