European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update
Language English Country Switzerland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
36967359
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013
PII: S0302-2838(23)02652-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- (Neo)adjuvant therapy, Chemotherapy, Genetic screening, Immunotherapy, Management, Prognostic factors, Renal pelvis, Surgery, Ureter, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * diagnosis therapy pathology MeSH
- Kidney Pelvis pathology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Kidney Neoplasms * diagnosis therapy pathology MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * pathology MeSH
- Ureteral Neoplasms * diagnosis therapy pathology MeSH
- Urology * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Department of Urology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital AP HP Université de Paris Paris France
Department of Urology Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
Department of Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain
Department of Urology The Stokes Centre for Urology Royal Surrey Hospital Guildford UK
Department of Urology Université de Paris AP HP Saint Louis Hospital Paris France
GRC 5 Predictive Onco Uro Sorbonne University AP HP Urology Pitie Salpetriere Hospital Paris France
References provided by Crossref.org
Hereditary and Familial Traits in Urological Cancers and Their Underlying Genes