Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: 5-Year Efficacy and Biomarker Results from CheckMate 238

. 2023 Sep 01 ; 29 (17) : 3352-3361.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37058595

PURPOSE: In the phase III CheckMate 238 study, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival versus ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C or stage IV melanoma, with benefit sustained at 4 years. We report updated 5-year efficacy and biomarker findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and baseline programmed death cell ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks, both intravenously for 1 year until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was RFS. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 62 months, RFS with nivolumab remained superior to ipilimumab (HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.86; 5-year rates of 50% vs. 39%). Five-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 58% with nivolumab versus 51% with ipilimumab. Five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% with nivolumab and 72% with ipilimumab (75% data maturity: 228 of 302 planned events). Higher levels of tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor PD-L1, intratumoral CD8+ T cells and IFNγ-associated gene expression signature, and lower levels of peripheral serum C-reactive protein were associated with improved RFS and OS with both nivolumab and ipilimumab, albeit with limited clinically meaningful predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a proven adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence, with sustained, long-term improvement in RFS and DMFS compared with ipilimumab and high OS rates. Identification of additional biomarkers is needed to better predict treatment outcome. See related commentary by Augustin and Luke, p. 3253.

Aix Marseille University Hôpital de la Timone Marseille France

Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton New Jersey

Center for Immuno Oncology University Hospital of Siena Siena Italy

Charles University 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Churchill Hospital Oxford United Kingdom

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy

Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation Greenslopes Private Hospital Greenslopes Queensland Australia

General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón and CIBERONC Madrid Spain

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida

Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Bénite France

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Clinical Oncology Department University of Seville Seville Spain

IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale Naples Italy

Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health New York

Mount Vernon Hospital Middlesex United Kingdom

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

Oncology Center Sf Nectarie Ltd Craiova Romania

Papa Giovanni XIII Hospital Bergamo Italy

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida

Tasman Health Care Southport QLD Australia

Texas Oncology Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center Dallas Texas

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center Ann Arbor Michigan

University of Western Australia and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia

Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV IRCCS Padua Italy

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, et al. . Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:522‒30. PubMed

Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, Chiarion-Sileni V, et al. . Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1813‒23. PubMed

Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1824‒35. PubMed

Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1789‒1801. PubMed

Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Reinhard D, Wolchok J, Schmidt H, et al. . Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1845‒55. PubMed PMC

Dummer R, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, Kirkwood JM, et al. . Five-year analysis of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1139‒48. PubMed

Weber J, Ascierto PA, Middleton M, Hennicken D, Zoffoli R, Pieters A, et al. . Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2021;158:225‒33. PubMed

Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:1465‒77. PubMed

Dummer R, Brase JC, Garrett J, Campbell CD, Gasal E, Squires M, et al. . Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFV600-mutant, stage III melanoma (COMBI-AD): exploratory biomarker analyses from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:358‒72. PubMed

Indini A, Roila F, Grossi F, Massi D, Mandalà M. Impact of circulating and tissue biomarkers in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma: ready for prime time? Am J Clin Dermatol 2021;22:511‒22. PubMed PMC

Weber JS, Schadendorf D, Del Vecchio M, Larkin J, Atkinson V, Schenker M, et al. . Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 915). J Clin Oncol 2023;41:517–27. PubMed PMC

Patel S, Othus M, Prieto V, Lowe M, Buchbinder E, Chen Y, et al. . Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant pembrolizumab for resected stage III-IV melanoma (SWOG S1801). Ann Oncol 2022;33(suppl_7):S808–69.

Lucas MW, Lijnsvelt J, Pulleman S, Scolyer RA, Menzies AM, Van Akkooi ACJ, et al. . The NADINA trial: a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab with standard adjuvant nivolumab in macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(16_suppl):TPS9605.

Larkin J, Weber J, Del Vecchio M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma: reassessment of 4-year CheckMate 238 efficacy outcomes per AJCC-8 staging criteria. Eur J Cancer 2022;173;285‒96. PubMed

Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . Longer follow-up confirms recurrence-free survival benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: updated results from EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3925‒36. PubMed PMC

Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . EORTC Melanoma Group. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:643‒54. PubMed

Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . Prognostic and predictive value of AJCC-8 staging in the phase III EORTC1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial of pembrolizumab vs placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2019;116:148‒57. PubMed

Moser JC, Pavlick AC, Poretta T, Chan P, Samlowski W, Robert N, et al. . Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab or monitored with observation. Poster presented at the Society for Melanoma Research (SMR), 18th International Congress, New Orleans, LA (Hybrid Congress), October 28–31, 2021.

Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, et al. . Five-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med Evid 2022;1. PubMed

Tarhini AA, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, Rao UNM, Cohen GI, Hamid O, et al. . Phase III study if adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon alfa-2b for resected high-risk melanoma: North American Intergroup E1609. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:567–75. PubMed PMC

Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Robert C, Mackiewicz A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Arance A, et al. . Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:611–22. PubMed

Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. . Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;37:23–34. PubMed PMC

Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. . Pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2521–32. PubMed

Healey Bird B, Nally K, Ronan K, Ronan K, Clarke G, Amu S, et al. . Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors-biomarkers of response and toxicity; current limitations and future promise. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:124. PubMed PMC

OPDIVO (nivolumab) injection, for intravenous use. Highlights of Prescribing Information. Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, 2022.

Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, Long GV, Qian X, et al. . TMB and inflammatory gene expression associated with clinical outcomes following immunotherapy in advanced melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2021;9:1202‒13. PubMed PMC

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) injection, for intravenous use. Highlights of Prescribing Information. Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2022.

Yang F, Wang JF, Wang Y, Liu B, Molina JR. Comparative analysis of predictive biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancers: developments and challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2021;14:109. PubMed PMC

Xu J, Wang F, Yan Y, Zhang Y, Du Y, Sun G. Prognostic and clinicopathological value of PD-L1 in melanoma: a meta-analysis. Am J Med Sci 2020;359:339‒46. PubMed

Yang J, Dong M, Shui Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Yin M, et al. . A pooled analysis of the prognostic value of PD-L1 in melanoma: evidence from 1062 patients. Cancer Cell Int 2020;20:96. PubMed PMC

Bai R, Lv Z, Xu D, Cui J. Predictive biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Biomark Res 2020;8:34. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...