Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: 5-Year Efficacy and Biomarker Results from CheckMate 238
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
37058595
PubMed Central
PMC10472092
DOI
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3145
PII: 725906
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická terapeutické užití MeSH
- antigeny CD274 MeSH
- antigeny CD279 terapeutické užití MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- ipilimumab terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie MeSH
- maligní melanom kůže MeSH
- melanom * farmakoterapie genetika patologie MeSH
- nivolumab * aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
- antigeny CD274 MeSH
- antigeny CD279 MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- ipilimumab MeSH
- nivolumab * MeSH
PURPOSE: In the phase III CheckMate 238 study, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival versus ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C or stage IV melanoma, with benefit sustained at 4 years. We report updated 5-year efficacy and biomarker findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and baseline programmed death cell ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks, both intravenously for 1 year until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was RFS. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 62 months, RFS with nivolumab remained superior to ipilimumab (HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.86; 5-year rates of 50% vs. 39%). Five-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 58% with nivolumab versus 51% with ipilimumab. Five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% with nivolumab and 72% with ipilimumab (75% data maturity: 228 of 302 planned events). Higher levels of tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor PD-L1, intratumoral CD8+ T cells and IFNγ-associated gene expression signature, and lower levels of peripheral serum C-reactive protein were associated with improved RFS and OS with both nivolumab and ipilimumab, albeit with limited clinically meaningful predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a proven adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence, with sustained, long-term improvement in RFS and DMFS compared with ipilimumab and high OS rates. Identification of additional biomarkers is needed to better predict treatment outcome. See related commentary by Augustin and Luke, p. 3253.
Aix Marseille University Hôpital de la Timone Marseille France
Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton New Jersey
Center for Immuno Oncology University Hospital of Siena Siena Italy
Churchill Hospital Oxford United Kingdom
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation Greenslopes Private Hospital Greenslopes Queensland Australia
General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón and CIBERONC Madrid Spain
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida
Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Bénite France
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale Naples Italy
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health New York
Mount Vernon Hospital Middlesex United Kingdom
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
Oncology Center Sf Nectarie Ltd Craiova Romania
Papa Giovanni XIII Hospital Bergamo Italy
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida
Tasman Health Care Southport QLD Australia
Texas Oncology Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center Dallas Texas
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center Ann Arbor Michigan
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, et al. . Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:522‒30. PubMed
Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, Chiarion-Sileni V, et al. . Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1813‒23. PubMed
Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1824‒35. PubMed
Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1789‒1801. PubMed
Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Reinhard D, Wolchok J, Schmidt H, et al. . Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1845‒55. PubMed PMC
Dummer R, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, Kirkwood JM, et al. . Five-year analysis of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1139‒48. PubMed
Weber J, Ascierto PA, Middleton M, Hennicken D, Zoffoli R, Pieters A, et al. . Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2021;158:225‒33. PubMed
Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:1465‒77. PubMed
Dummer R, Brase JC, Garrett J, Campbell CD, Gasal E, Squires M, et al. . Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFV600-mutant, stage III melanoma (COMBI-AD): exploratory biomarker analyses from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:358‒72. PubMed
Indini A, Roila F, Grossi F, Massi D, Mandalà M. Impact of circulating and tissue biomarkers in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma: ready for prime time? Am J Clin Dermatol 2021;22:511‒22. PubMed PMC
Weber JS, Schadendorf D, Del Vecchio M, Larkin J, Atkinson V, Schenker M, et al. . Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 915). J Clin Oncol 2023;41:517–27. PubMed PMC
Patel S, Othus M, Prieto V, Lowe M, Buchbinder E, Chen Y, et al. . Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant pembrolizumab for resected stage III-IV melanoma (SWOG S1801). Ann Oncol 2022;33(suppl_7):S808–69.
Lucas MW, Lijnsvelt J, Pulleman S, Scolyer RA, Menzies AM, Van Akkooi ACJ, et al. . The NADINA trial: a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab with standard adjuvant nivolumab in macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(16_suppl):TPS9605.
Larkin J, Weber J, Del Vecchio M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma: reassessment of 4-year CheckMate 238 efficacy outcomes per AJCC-8 staging criteria. Eur J Cancer 2022;173;285‒96. PubMed
Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . Longer follow-up confirms recurrence-free survival benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: updated results from EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3925‒36. PubMed PMC
Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . EORTC Melanoma Group. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:643‒54. PubMed
Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. . Prognostic and predictive value of AJCC-8 staging in the phase III EORTC1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial of pembrolizumab vs placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2019;116:148‒57. PubMed
Moser JC, Pavlick AC, Poretta T, Chan P, Samlowski W, Robert N, et al. . Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab or monitored with observation. Poster presented at the Society for Melanoma Research (SMR), 18th International Congress, New Orleans, LA (Hybrid Congress), October 28–31, 2021.
Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, et al. . Five-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med Evid 2022;1. PubMed
Tarhini AA, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, Rao UNM, Cohen GI, Hamid O, et al. . Phase III study if adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon alfa-2b for resected high-risk melanoma: North American Intergroup E1609. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:567–75. PubMed PMC
Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Robert C, Mackiewicz A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Arance A, et al. . Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:611–22. PubMed
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. . Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;37:23–34. PubMed PMC
Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. . Pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2521–32. PubMed
Healey Bird B, Nally K, Ronan K, Ronan K, Clarke G, Amu S, et al. . Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors-biomarkers of response and toxicity; current limitations and future promise. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:124. PubMed PMC
OPDIVO (nivolumab) injection, for intravenous use. Highlights of Prescribing Information. Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, 2022.
Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, Long GV, Qian X, et al. . TMB and inflammatory gene expression associated with clinical outcomes following immunotherapy in advanced melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2021;9:1202‒13. PubMed PMC
KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) injection, for intravenous use. Highlights of Prescribing Information. Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2022.
Yang F, Wang JF, Wang Y, Liu B, Molina JR. Comparative analysis of predictive biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancers: developments and challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2021;14:109. PubMed PMC
Xu J, Wang F, Yan Y, Zhang Y, Du Y, Sun G. Prognostic and clinicopathological value of PD-L1 in melanoma: a meta-analysis. Am J Med Sci 2020;359:339‒46. PubMed
Yang J, Dong M, Shui Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Yin M, et al. . A pooled analysis of the prognostic value of PD-L1 in melanoma: evidence from 1062 patients. Cancer Cell Int 2020;20:96. PubMed PMC
Bai R, Lv Z, Xu D, Cui J. Predictive biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Biomark Res 2020;8:34. PubMed PMC