Semmelweis' discovery of the etiology of childbed fever has long attracted the attention of historians of medicine and biographers. In recent years it has also become of increasing interest to philosophers. In this paper I discuss the interpretation of Semmelweis' methodology from the viewpoint of the inference to the best explanation and argue that Popperian methodology is better at capturing the dynamics of the growth of knowledge. Furthermore, I criticize the attempts to explain the failure of Semmelweis to have his discovery accepted on the basis of the Kuhnian concept of paradigms, and warn that this view may endorse dogmatism as the norm The Kuhnian position also raises the problem of the authoritarian nature of scientific institutions which defend a paradigm against unorthodox, rebellious views, such as in the case of Semmelweis. Popperian philosophy is seen as a challenge to promote a link between an open society and open science with its main aim being to cherish a free critical spirit.

Institute of Philosophy Czech Academy of Sciences Jilská 1 Praha 1 110 00 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bird, Alexander. 2010. Eliminative abduction: examples from medicine. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 345–352. DOI

Broadbent, Alex. 2009. Causation and models of disease in epidemiology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 302–311. DOI

Codell Carter, Kay. 1983. Translator’s introduction. In I. Semmelweis, The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever (K. Codell, and Carter, Trans. & Ed.) (pp. 3–58). Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

Fuller, Steve. 2003. Kuhn vs. Popper. Icon Books: Cambridge.

Gillies, Donald. 2005. Hempelian and Kuhnian approaches in the philosophy of medicine: the Semmelweis case. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 159–181. DOI

Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1982. [1970]. Logic of discovery or psychology of research? Criticism and the growth of knowledge, eds. Imre Lakatos, Musgrave Alan, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lesky, Erna. 1976. The Vienna medical school of the nineteenth century. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the best explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Loudon, Irwine. 2000. The tragedy of childbed fever. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI

Miller, David. 1994. Critical rationalism. A restatement and defence. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

Nuland, Sherwin B. 2003. The doctor’s plague.: germs, childbed fever and the strange story of Ignaz Semmelweis. New York: W.W. Norton Company.

Obenchain, Theodore G. 2016. Genius belabored. Childbed fever and the tragic life of Ignaz Semmelweis. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.

Parusniková, Zuzana. 2021. Karl Popper: his philosophy and science. In Karl Popper’s science and philosophy, eds. Zuzana Parusniková, Merritt, David, 1-14. Cham: Springer.

Popper, Karl R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row.

Popper, Karl R. 1979. [1972]. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Popper, Karl R. 1986. [1957]. The poverty of historicism. London and New York: Ark Paperbacks.

Popper, Karl R. 2003. [1999]. All life is problem solving. London and New York: Routledge.

Popper, Karl R. 1982[1970]. Normal science and its dangers. Criticism and the growth of knowledge, eds. Imre Lakatos, Musgrave Alan, 51–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scholl, Raphael. 2013. Causal inference, mechanisms, and the Semmelweis case. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 66–76. DOI

Semmelweis, Ignaz. 1983. The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever (Kay Codell Carter trans. and ed.). Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Tulodziecki, Dana. 2013. Shattering the myth of Semmelweis. Philosophy of Science 5: 1065–1075. DOI

Watkins, John. 1982. Against ‘Normal science’. Criticism and the growth of knowledge, eds. Imre Lakatos, Musgrave Alan, 25–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.