Although the aesthetic appreciation of flowers is a well-known aspect of human behaviour, theories explaining its origin are missing. The only exception is the evolutionary theory of Heerwagen and Orians. Surprisingly, it has not yet been empirically tested. The authors suggest that humans aesthetically respond to flowers because they signal food availability. The logic of the theory implies that fruits are more reliable and direct food availability signals than flowers. Therefore, fruits should elicit stronger aesthetic responses than flowers. To test this assumption, we performed two online studies in the Czech Republic. The participants (n = 2792 and 744, respectively) indicated on a six-point scale their aesthetic response to photographs of 14 edible Czech plant species (study A) and 20 edible plant species from the African savannas (study B), varying in growth stage (flowering, fruiting). We found no difference between the Czech fruiting and flowering plants and a stronger aesthetic response to African flowering plants. A third study (n = 817) confirmed that flowers were preferred to fruits, using a forced-choice paradigm. Our results suggest that the theory cannot fully explain human aesthetic responses to flowers. We discuss alternative explanations. This topic deserves renewed attention from researchers working in related fields.

Charles University Faculty of Science Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009). Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 124–132. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.005 DOI

Appleton, J. (1996). The experience of landscape. Wiley.

Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14(1), 5–28. 10.1177/0013916582141001 DOI

Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17(8), 645–648. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x PubMed DOI

Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2007). Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2191–2200. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.008 PubMed DOI PMC

Berlyne, D., E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 265–289.

Camgöz, N., Yener, C., & Güvenç, D. (2002). Effects of hue, saturation, and brightness on preference. Color Research & Application, 27(3), 199–207.

Cauquelin, J. (1991). Le chamanisme chez les Puyuma de Taiwan et son évolution sous l'impact de l'occupation japonaise. Archipel, 41(1), 139–152. 10.3406/arch.1991.2716 DOI

Champely, S. (2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (1.2-2) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr

Crozier, W. R. (1999). The meanings of colour: Preferences among hues. Pigment & Resin Technology, 28(1), 6–14.

de Albuquerque, U. P., & Hanazaki, N. (2009). Five problems in current ethnobotanical research – And some suggestions for strengthening them. Human Ecology, 37(5), 653–661. 10.1007/s10745-009-9259-9 DOI

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. Aldine De Gruyter.

Elsner, C., & Wertz, A. E. (2019). The seeds of social learning: Infants exhibit more social looking for plants than other object types. Cognition, 183, 244–255. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.016 PubMed DOI

Enquist, M., & Johnstone, R. A. (1997). Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264(1386), 1345–1348.

Evans, I. H. N. (1913). The negritos of Malaya. Cambridge University Press.

Fouze, A. Q., & Amit, M. (2019). Ethnomathematics and geometrical shapes in Bedouin women's traditional dress. Creative Education, 10(07), 1539–1560. 10.4236/ce.2019.107112 DOI

Gaoue, O. G., Coe, M. A., Bond, M., Hart, G., Seyler, B. C., & McMillen, H. (2017). Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Economic Botany, 71(3), 269–287.

Goody, J. (1993). The culture of flowers. Cambridge University Press.

Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1995). Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In Kellert S. R. (Ed.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 138–172). Island Press.

Heymann, E. (2011). Florivory, nectarivory, and pollination – A review of primate–flower interactions. Ecotropica, 17, 41–52.

Hogan, J. D., Melin, A. D., Mosdossy, K. N., & Fedigan, L. M. (2016). Seasonal importance of flowers to Costa Rican capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator): Implications for plant and primate. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 161(4), 591–602. 10.1002/ajpa.23059 PubMed DOI

Hůla, M. (2020). ‘Habitat Selection and Human Aesthetic Responses to Flowers’ – Dataset (1557737 bytes). figshare. 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.11956632.V1 PubMed DOI PMC

Hůla, M., & Flegr, J. (2016). What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty. PeerJ, 4, e2106. PubMed PMC

Hůla, M, Šámalová, P, & Flegr, J. (2018). Symmetry, prototypicality, complexity, color and human aesthetic perception of flowers and their photographs [Conference presentation]. Toronto, ON, Canada: IAEA 2018 Congress. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19315.58400. DOI

Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17(16), R623–R625. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022 PubMed DOI

Jones, A. L., & Jaeger, B. (2019). Biological bases of beauty revisited: The effect of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism on female facial attractiveness. Symmetry, 11(2), 279. 10.3390/sym11020279 DOI

Kellert, S. R. (Ed.). (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press/Shearwater Books.

Komárek, S. (2009). Nature and culture: The world of phenomena and the world of interpretation. LINCOM Europa.

Koubaa, Y., & Eleuch, A. (2020). Multimodal perceptual processing of cues in food ads: Do you smell what you see?: Visual-induced olfactory imagery and its effects on taste perception and food consumption. Journal of Advertising Research, JAR-2020-006. 10.2501/JAR-2020-006 DOI

KulturIT. (2020, November). DigitaltMuseum. https://digitaltmuseum.no/search/?q=gahpir&aq=descname%3F%3A%22Gahpir%22&o=0&n=128

Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457–470. 10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3 PubMed DOI

Leder, H., Tinio, P. P. L., & Bar, M. (2011). Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects. Perception, 40(6), 649–655. 10.1068/p6845 PubMed DOI

Linton, R. (1926). Ethnology of Polynesia and Micronesia. Guide (Field Museum of Natural History), 6, 1–191. JSTOR.

Lwin, M. O., Morrin, M., & Krishna, A. (2010). Exploring the superadditive effects of scent and pictures on verbal recall: An extension of dual coding theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 317–326. 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.04.001 DOI

Mamias, S. (2018, August 2). The floriculture supply-chain: Characteristics & prospects. Supply-chains in the Agri-food Sector as the UK Leaves the EU, Amsterdam. https://unionfleurs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/UF_Characteristics-of-the-Flower-Supply-chain-_FEB-2018.pdf

Marlowe, F. W., & Berbesque, J. C. (2009). Tubers as fallback foods and their impact on Hadza hunter–gatherers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(4), 751–758. 10.1002/ajpa.21040 PubMed DOI

Muderrisoglu, H., Aydin, S., Yerli, O., & Kutay, E. (2009). Effects of colours and forms of trees on visual perceptions. Pak. J. Bot, 41(6), 2697–2710.

Nadel, D., Danin, A., Power, R. C., Rosen, A. M., Bocquentin, F., Tsatskin, A., … Boaretto, E. (2013). Earliest floral grave lining from 13,700-11,700-y-old Natufian burials at Raqefet Cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 11774–11778. 10.1073/pnas.1302277110 PubMed DOI PMC

Newton-Fisher, N. E. (1999). The diet of chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda: Diet of Budongo chimpanzees. African Journal of Ecology, 37(3), 344–354. 10.1046/j.1365-2028.1999.00186.x DOI

Norton, C. H. (2019). Inuit ethnobotany in the North American Subarctic and Arctic: Celebrating a rich history and expanding research into new areas using biocultural diversity. (Master's thesis, Universtié de Montréal, Montréal, Canada). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/22249

Oberzaucher, E. (2017). Biophilie, oder wie Pflanzen Leben retten. In Oberzaucher E., Homo urbanus (pp. 69–82). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-662-53838-8_11 DOI

Orians, G. H., & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscape. In Barkow J. H., Cosmides L., & Tooby J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). Oxford University Press.

Osorio, D., & Vorobyev, M. (1996). Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 263(1370), 593–599. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0089 PubMed DOI

Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(19), 8877–8882. PubMed PMC

Park, J., Shimojo, E., & Shimojo, S. (2010). Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(33), 14552–14555. 10.1073/pnas.1004374107 PubMed DOI PMC

Párraga, C. A., Troscianko, T., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2002). Spatiochromatic properties of natural images and human vision. Current Biology, 12(6), 483–487. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00718-2 PubMed DOI

Patil, I. (2018). ggstatsplot: ‘ggplot2’ based plots with statistical details. [CRAN]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggstatsplot

Pedersen, D. M. (1978). Relationship between environmental familiarity and environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(3), 739–743.

Peters, C. R., O'Brien, E. M., Boaz, N. T., Conroy, G. C., Godfrey, L. R., Kawanaka, K., & Smith, E. O. (1981).). The early hominid plant-food niche: Insights from an analysis of plant exploitation by Homo, Pan, and Papio in eastern and southern Africa [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 22(2), 127–140.

Peters, C. R., O'Brien, E. M., & Box, E. O. (1984). Plant types and seasonality of wild-plant foods, Tanzania to southwestern Africa: Resources for models of the natural environment. Journal of Human Evolution, 13(5), 397–414.

Primack, R. B. (1985). Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16(1), 15–37.

Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2012). Beautiful fruits taste good: The aesthetic influences of fruit preferences in humans. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 69(1), 71–83. 10.1127/0003-5548/2011/0120 PubMed DOI

Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2014). Seeing coloured fruits: Utilisation of the theory of adaptive memory in teaching botany. Journal of Biological Education, 48(3), 127–132. 10.1080/00219266.2013.837407 DOI

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. PubMed

Redies, C. (2015). Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 09. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00218 PubMed DOI PMC

Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Viénot, F., Charles-Dominique, P., & Mollon, J. D. (2001). Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1407), 229–283. 10.1098/rstb.2000.0773 PubMed DOI PMC

Renoult, J. P. (2016). The evolution of aesthetics: A review of models. In Kapoula Z. & Vernet M. (Eds.), Aesthetics and Neuroscience (pp. 271–299). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-46233-2_17 DOI

Renoult, J. P., & Mendelson, T. C. (2019). Processing bias: Extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1900), 20190165. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0165 PubMed DOI PMC

RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/

Ruso, B., Renninger, L., & Atzwanger, K. (2003). Human habitat preferences: A generative territory for evolutionary aesthetics research. In Grammer K. & Voland E. (Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 279–294). Springer.

Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter–gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 261–268. 10.1007/s10508-006-9168-6 PubMed DOI

Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In Barkow J. H., Cosmides L., & Tooby J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 531–549). Oxford University Press.

Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 25–42.

Solecki, R., S. (1975). Shanidar IV, a Neanderthal flower burial in northern Iraq. Science, 190(4217), 880–881.

Sommer, J. D. (1999). The Shanidar IV ‘flower burial’: A re-evaluation of Neanderthal burial ritual. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), 127–129. 10.1017/S0959774300015249 DOI

Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., & Witzel, C. (2014). Sex differences in color preferences transcend extreme differences in culture and ecology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1195–1201. 10.3758/s13423-014-0591-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Sumner, P., & Mollon, J. D. (2000). Catarrhine photopigments are optimized for detecting targets against a foliage background. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203(13), 1963. PubMed

Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics informs traditional aesthetics. In Grammer K. & Voland E. (Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 9–35). Springer.

Tinio, P. P., & Leder, H. (2009). Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica, 130(3), 241–250. PubMed

Ulrich, R. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman I. & Wohlwill J. F. (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 DOI

Ulrich, R. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29–44.

Voland, E., & Grammer, K. (2003). Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer.

Wertz, A. E., & Wynn, K. (2014a). Thyme to touch: Infants possess strategies that protect them from dangers posed by plants. Cognition, 130(1), 44–49. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Wertz, A. E., & Wynn, K. (2014b). Selective social learning of plant edibility in 6- and 18-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 25(4), 874–882. 10.1177/0956797613516145 PubMed DOI PMC

Westerman, S. J., Gardner, P. H., Sutherland, E. J., White, T., Jordan, K., Watts, D., & Wells, S. (2012). Product design: Preference for rounded versus angular design elements: Rounded versus angular design. Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), 595–605. 10.1002/mar.20546 DOI

Whitfield, T. A., & Slatter, P. E. (1979). The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 65–75.

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press.

Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806. PubMed

Włodarczyk, A., Elsner, C., Schmitterer, A., & Wertz, A. E. (2018). Every rose has its thorn: Infants’ responses to pointed shapes in naturalistic contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 583–593. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.001 DOI

Yue, C., & Behe, B. K. (2010). Consumer color preferences for single-stem cut flowers on calendar holidays and noncalendar occasions. HortScience, 45(1), 78–82.

Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G., & Anderson, T. W. (1975). Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the Northeast. In Zube E. H., Brush R. O., & Fabos J. G. (Eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions, & resources (pp. 151–167). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

Habitat selection and human aesthetic responses to flowers

See more in PubMed

figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.11956632.v1