Our research aims to support decision-making regarding the financing of healthcare projects by structural funds with policies targeting reduction of the development gap among different regions and countries of the European Union as well as the achievement of economic and social cohesion. A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects should rank the project applications for the selected region, accounting for the investor's wishes in the form of a regional coefficient in order to reduce the development gap between regions. On the one hand, our proposed model evaluates project applications based on selected criteria, which may be structured, weakly structured, or unstructured. On the other hand, it also incorporates information on the level of healthcare development in the region. The obtained ranking increases the degree of validity of the decision regarding the selection of projects for financing by investors, considering the level of development of the region where the project will be implemented. At the expense of European Union (EU) structural funds, a village, city, region, or state can receive funds for modernization and development of the healthcare sector and all related processes. To minimize risks, it is necessary to implement adequate support systems for decision-making in the assessment of project applications, as well as regional policy in the region where the project will be implemented. The primary goal of this study was to develop a complex fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of projects in the field of healthcare with the aim of reducing the development gap between regions. Based on the above description, we formed the following scientific hypothesis for this research: if the project selected for financing can successfully achieve its stated goals and increase the level of development of its region, it should be evaluated positively. This evaluation can be obtained using a complex fuzzy model constructed to account for the region's level of development in terms of the availability and quality of healthcare services in the region where the project will be implemented.

Department of Addictology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General Teaching Hospital Prague Prague Czechia

Department of Flight Training Faculty of Aeronautics Technical University of Košice Košice Slovakia

Department of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine Uzhhorod National University Uzhhorod Ukraine

Department of Software Systems Faculty of Information Technology Uzhhorod National University Uzhhorod Ukraine

Technical University of Košice Faculty of Mining Ecology Process Control and Geotechnologies Košice Slovakia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Clark J, Horton R. A coming of age for gender in global health. Lancet. (2019) 393:2367–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30986-9 PubMed DOI

Petrovic D, de Mestral C, Bochud M, Bartley M, Kivimäki M, Vineis P, et al. . The contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health: a systematic review. Prev Med. (2018) 113:15–31. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003 PubMed DOI

Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, et al. . Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:2468–81. 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519 PubMed DOI

Helgesen MK, Fosse E, Hagen S. Capacity to reduce inequities in health in Norwegian municipalities. Scand J Public Health. (2017) 45(18_suppl.):77–82. 10.1177/1403494817709412 PubMed DOI

Luy M, Minagawa Y. Gender gaps-Life expectancy and proportion of life in poor health. Health reports. (2014) 25:12. 10.1093/eurpub/cku211 PubMed DOI

Williams DR. The health of men: structured inequalities and opportunities. Am J Public Health. (2008) 98(Suppl._1):S150–7. 10.2105/AJPH.98.Supplement_1.S150 PubMed DOI PMC

Storm I, den Hertog F, Van Oers H, Schuit AJ. How to improve collaboration between the public health sector and other policy sectors to reduce health inequalities?–A study in sixteen municipalities in the Netherlands. Int J Equity Health. (2016) 15:1–14. 10.1186/s12939-016-0384-y PubMed DOI PMC

Barsanti S, Salmi LR, Bourgueil Y, Daponte A, Pinzal E, Ménival S. Strategies and governance to reduce health inequalities: evidences from a cross-European survey. Global Health Res Policy. (2017) 2:1–11. 10.1186/s41256-017-0038-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Salmi LR, Barsanti S, Bourgueil Y, Daponte A, Piznal E, Ménival S, et al. . Interventions addressing health inequalities in European regions: the AIR project. Health Promot Int. (2017) 32:430–41. 10.1093/heapro/dav101 PubMed DOI

Morrison J, Pons-Vigués M, Díez E, Pasarin MI, Salas-Nicás S, Borrell C. Perceptions and beliefs of public policymakers in a Southern European city. Int J Equity Health. (2015) 14:1–10. 10.1186/s12939-015-0143-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Guldbrandsson K, Bremberg S. Cross-sectoral cooperation at the ministerial level in three Nordic countries-With a focus on health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. (2020) 256:112999. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112999 PubMed DOI

Pons-Vigués M, Diez È, Morrison J, Salas-Nicás S, Hoffmann R, Burstrom B, et al. . Social and health policies or interventions to tackle health inequalities in European cities: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. (2014) 14:1–12. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-198 PubMed DOI PMC

Diez E, Morrison J, Pons-Vigués M, Borrell C, Corman D, Burström B, et al. . Municipal interventions against inequalities in health: The view of their managers. Scand J Public Health. (2014) 42:476–87. 10.1177/1403494814529850 PubMed DOI

Mardani A, Hooker RE, Ozkul S, Yifan S, Nilashi M, Sabzi HZ, et al. . Application of decision making and fuzzy sets theory to evaluate the healthcare and medical problems: a review of three decades of research with recent developments. Expert Syst Appl. (2019) 137:202–31. 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.002 DOI

Gavurova B, Kelemen M, Polishchuk V. Expert model of risk assessment for the selected components of smart city concept: From safe time to pandemics as COVID-19. Socioecon Plann Sci. (2022) 82:101253. 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101253 PubMed DOI PMC

Stefko R, Gavurova B, Korony S. Efficiency measurement in healthcare work management using Malmquist indices. Polish J Manag Stud. (2016) 13:168–80. 10.17512/pjms.2016.13.1.16 DOI

Bhatti MA, Alyahya M. Role of leadership style in enhancing health workers job performance. Polish J Manag Stud. (2021) 24:55–66. 10.17512/pjms.2021.24.2.04 DOI

Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE. Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. (1997) 44:757–71. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00073-1 PubMed DOI

Shpak N, Sorochak O, Gvozd M, Horbal N, Mykhalyuno Y, Sroka W. Mechanism of competitiveness management in the public healthcare: a practical aspect. Administr Manag Public. (2022) 39:40–62. 10.24818/amp/2022.39-03 DOI

Kočvarová L, Barták M. Analysis of the media image and presentation of direct and hidden advertising of alcohol in selected Czech mass communication media. Study Protoc. Adiktol. (2022) 22:264–71. 10.35198/01-2022-004-0006 DOI

Papadaki Š. The amount of excise tax and its effect on the consumption of alcohol and cigarettes in European countries. Adiktologie. (2022) 22:234–43. 10.35198/01-2022-004-0005 DOI

Muneer A, Abdemaqsoud SH, Foad W, Zidan M. Epidemiological study of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour among patients with substance use disorders in a rehabilitation and treatment centre for addiction in Dubai. Adiktologie. (2022) 22:172–83. 10.35198/01-2022-003-0002 DOI

Cerešník M, Cerešníková M. Risk behaviour of adolescents aged 10–15 in Slovakia. Relation to sex, age, and body mass index. Adiktologie. (2022) 22:162–70. 10.35198/01-2022-003-0001 DOI

Štrangfeldová J, Mališová D. Application of actuarial modeling to determine the rate of health insurance in solidary health care systems: a case of Slovakia. Administr Manag Public. (2021) 37:90–102. 10.24818/amp/2021.37-06 DOI

Pisár P, Priščáková S, Špaček D, Nemec J. Digitization as a tool of e-government in selected public services of the state: international comparison of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Administr Manag Public. (2022) 39:111–32. 10.24818/amp/2022.39-07 DOI

Stefko R, Gavurova B, Rigelsky M, Ivankova V. Evaluation of selected indicators of patient satisfaction and economic indices in OECD country. Econ Sociol. (2019) 12:149–65. 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/9 PubMed DOI

Liu H, Li Y, Tisdell CA, Wang F. How does childcare by grandparents affect the health of children in China? Econ Sociol. (2021) 14:11–30. 10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-4/1 DOI

Riklikiene O, Didenko O, Ciutiene R, Daunoriene A, Ciarniene R. Balancing nurses' workload: a case study with nurse anaesthetists and intensive care nurses. Econ Sociol. (2020) 13:11–25. 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/1 DOI

Mackenbach JP. Can we reduce health inequalities? An analysis of the English strategy (1997–2010). J Epidemiol Commun Health. (2011) 65:568–75. 10.1136/jech.2010.128280 PubMed DOI

Hagen S, Torp S, Helgesen M, Fosse E. Promoting health by addressing living conditions in Norwegian municipalities. Health Promot Int. (2017) 32:977–87. 10.1093/heapro/daw052 PubMed DOI

Borrell LN, Vaughan R. An AJPH supplement toward a unified research approach for minority health and health disparities. Am J Public Health. (2019) 109:S6–7. 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304963 PubMed DOI PMC

Szymborski J, Zatoński W. The activities of the Government Population Council aimed at limiting health care inequalities. J Health Inequal. (2017) 3:30–40. 10.5114/jhi.2017.69163 DOI

Javakhishvili JD, Kirtadze I, Otiashvili D. ‘Ten years later' – Developing institutional mechanisms for drug demand reduction and addictology education in Georgia – A case study. Adiktologie. (2022) 22:35–46. 10.35198/01-2022-001-0005 DOI

Orte C, Amer J, Gomila AM, Pascual B. Combining the European Prevention Curriculum (EUPC) and Universal Treatment Curriculum (UTC) in a Master's Degree in Addictions. Adiktologie. (2022) 22:7–12. 10.35198/01-2022-001-0006 DOI

Rolová G. Health literacy in residential addiction treatment programs: study protocol of a cross-sectional study in people with substance use disorders. Adiktologie. (2020) 20:145–50. 10.35198/01-2020-002-0009 DOI

Gul M. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Human Ecol Risk Assess. (2018) 24:1723–60. 10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531 DOI

Shaygan A, Testik ÖM. A fuzzy AHP-based methodology for project prioritization and selection. Soft Comput. (2019) 23:1309–19. 10.1007/s00500-017-2851-9 DOI

Chatterjee K, Hossain SA. Kar S. Prioritization of project proposals in portfolio management using fuzzy AHP. OPSEARCH. (2018) 55:478–501. 10.1007/s12597-018-0331-3 DOI

Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Zavadskas EK, Yakhchali SH, Ghasempourabadi MH. Project portfolio selection using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR techniques. Transf Bus Econ. (2012) 11.

Bolat B, Çebi F, Tekin Temur G, Otay I. A fuzzy integrated approach for project selection. J Enterpr Inf Manag. (2014) 27:247–60. 10.1108/JEIM-12-2013-0091 DOI

Rȩbiasz B, Gaweł B, Skalna I. Fuzzy multi-attribute evaluation of investments. Adv ICT Bus Ind Public Sector. (2015) 141–56. 10.1007/978-3-319-11328-9_9 PubMed DOI

Enea M, Piazza T. Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optimiz Decis Making. (2004) 3:39–62. 10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3d DOI

Tulasi CL, Rao AR. Resource allocation in project scheduling application of fuzzy AHP. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Technol. Business Manage. (2015). p. 512–21.

Mahmoodzadeh S, Shahrabi J, Pariazar M, Zaeri MS. Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. Int J Ind Manuf Eng. (2007) 1:270–5.

Mohammed HJ, Al-Jubori IAM, Kasim MM. Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC (2019). 040018 p.

Tüysüz F, Kahraman C. Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: an application to information technology projects. Int J Intell Syst. (2006) 21:559–84. 10.1002/int.20148 DOI

Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM. A new framework for high-technology project evaluation and project portfolio selection based on Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS, MOORA and mathematical modeling. Iran J Fuzzy Syst. (2019) 16:89–106. 10.22111/IJFS.2019.5022 DOI

Oh J, Yang J, Lee S. Managing uncertainty to improve decision-making in NPD portfolio management with a fuzzy expert system. Exp Syst Appl. (2012) 39:9868–85. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.164 DOI

Jafarzadeh H, Akbari P, Abedin B. A methodology for project portfolio selection under criteria prioritisation, uncertainty and projects interdependency–combination of fuzzy QFD and DEA. Expert Syst Appl. (2018) 110:237–49. 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.028 DOI

Mohanty RP, Agarwal R, Choudhury AK, Tiwari MK. A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int J Prod Res. (2005) 43:5199–216. 10.1080/00207540500219031 DOI

Bellahcene M, Benamar FZ, Mekidiche M. Ahp and wafgp hybrid model for information system project selection. Int J Anal Hierar Process. (2020) 12:228–253. 10.13033/ijahp.v12i2.761 PubMed DOI

Riddell S, Wallace WA. The use of fuzzy logic and expert judgment in the R&D project portfolio selection process. Int J Technol Manag. (2011) 53:238–56. 10.1504/IJTM.2011.038592 DOI

Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Antuchevičiene J, Mojtahed M. Project portfolio selection problems: a review of models, uncertainty approaches, solution techniques, and case studies. Technol Econ Dev Econ. (2019) 25:1380–412. 10.3846/tede.2019.11410 DOI

Wu LH, Wu L, Shi J, Chou Y-T. Project portfolio selection considering uncertainty: stochastic dominance-based fuzzy ranking. Int J Fuzzy Syst. (2021) 23:2048–66. 10.1007/s40815-021-01069-y DOI

Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas EK. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst Appl. (2015) 42:4126–48. 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 DOI

Mardani A, Saraji MK, Mishra AR, Rani P. A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak. Appl Soft Comput. (2020) 96:106613. 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106613 PubMed DOI PMC

Zare H, Tavana M, Mardani A, Masoudian S, Kamali Saraji M. A hybrid data envelopment analysis and game theory model for performance measurement in healthcare. Health Care Manag Sci. (2019) 22:475–88. 10.1007/s10729-018-9456-4 PubMed DOI

Grondys K, Slusarczyk O, Androniceanu A. Risk assessment of the sme sector operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:4183. 10.3390/ijerph18084183 PubMed DOI PMC

Androniceanu A, Sabie OM, Pegulescu A. An integrated approach of the human resources motivation and the quality of health services. Theor Empir Res Urban Manag. (2020) 15:42–53.

Gavurova B, Kubák M. The importance of evaluating inpatients' satisfaction with emphasis on the aspect of confidence. Oecon Copern. (2021) 12:821–48. 10.24136/oc.2021.027 DOI

Jakubowska D, Radzymińska M. Health and environmental attitudes and values in food choices: a comparative study for Poland and Czech Republic. Oecon Copern. (2019) 10:433–52. 10.24136/oc.2019.021 DOI

Liu N, Xu Z, Skare M. The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: Analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics. Oecon Copern. (2021) 12:217–68. 10.24136/oc.2021.009 DOI

Bekken W, Dahl E, Van Der Wel K. Tackling health inequality at the local level: Some critical reflections on the future of Norwegian policies. Scand J Public Health. (2027) 45(18_suppl):56–61. 10.1177/1403494817701012 PubMed DOI

Kelemen M, Gavurova B, Polishchuk V. A complex hybrid model for evaluating projects to improve the sustainability and health of regions and cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:8217. 10.3390/ijerph19138217 PubMed DOI PMC

Simionescu M, Strielkowski W, Gavurova B. Could quality of governance influence pollution? Evidence from the revised Environmental Kuznets Curve in Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Rep. (2022) 8:809–19. 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.031 DOI

Androniceanu A. The social sustainability of smart cities: urban technological innovation, big data management, and the cognitive internet of things. Geopolit Hist Int Relat. (2019) 11:110–5. 10.22381/GHIR112201910 DOI

Saja P, Wozny A, Bednarova L. Risk management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in an enterprise–Ishikawa cause-and-effect diagram. Syst Safety. (2021) 3:253–9. 10.2478/czoto-2021-0026 DOI