Association between age and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapies for mRCC: a meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
37694583
DOI
10.2217/imt-2023-0039
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ICI, age, immune checkpoint inhibitors, metastasis, renal cell carcinoma, tyrosine kinase inhibitors,
- MeSH
- imunoterapie MeSH
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk * terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * terapie MeSH
- sunitinib MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Názvy látek
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů MeSH
- sunitinib MeSH
Aim: To compare the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients stratified by chronological age. Methods: According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) from randomized controlled trials were synthesized. Results: Five RCTs were eligible for meta-analyses. ICI-based combinations significantly improved OS compared with sunitinib alone, both in younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, whereas the OS benefit was significantly better in younger patients (p = 0.007). ICI-based combinations did not improve OS in patients aged ≥75 years. Treatment rankings showed age-related differential recommendations regarding improved OS. Conclusion: OS benefit from first-line ICI-based combinations was significantly greater in younger patients. Age-related differences could help enrich shared decision-making.
Scientists have found a special way to treat a type of cancer called metastatic renal cell carcinoma. They use a combination of medicines that help the body's immune system fight cancer. These treatments are very effective and recommended as the first choice for patients with this type cancer. However, as people get older, their immune systems may not work as well. Studies looking at how these treatments work in different age groups, and it was discovered that these treatments improved the chances of survival for all patients, no matter their age. However, they also noticed that younger patients got even more benefits from the treatments. Because of these discoveries, doctors can now make better decisions about which treatment to use for patients with this type of cancer, depending on patient age.
Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology Jagiellonian University Krakow 30 688 Poland
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague 15006 Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna 1090 Austria
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam 32253 Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives 31130 France
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze 41 800 Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo 105 8461 Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg 20251 Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX 75390 USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College NY 10021 USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman 19328 Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow 119435 Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna 1090 Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org